"socialist" when describing Hillary Clinton

"Matt W. Barrow" wrote:
in message ...

"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...
"Matt W. Barrow" wrote:


Gullibility doesn't suit someone your age.

Haw!

That's rich, coming from someone who fell for crackpot Prof. Van Zandt's
"proof" that humanity can't possibly be causing the CO2 level to go up.

Did you think no one would remember?

Oh...as "refuted" by realclimate?

No; by me and Logajan.

You remember him, don't you?

The guy you lied about kill-filing.

And got caught.

I remember your "refutation".

Your memory is either failing or selective, Matt.

The math was wrong. The Professor mixed up carbon and carbon dioxide. This
was pointed out to you. You ran away.



And he never said humanity was causing it to go up...he said it was not
even a spit in the ocean.

I guess you meant to write "humanity *wasn't* causing it to go up."

Bull****.

That's exactly what he said.

And you fell for it because you'll fall for any crackpot denier BS you come
across.

Here's what the ol' perfesser concluded:

8. Human activity, carried out at the present rate indefinately (more than
12 years) cannot possibly account for more than 6 per cent of the observed
change in CO2 levels.

Why don't you trying learning to comprehend rather than just barf back?

Haw-haw! Yer killin' me, Matt.

You want to give *me* advice about not barfing back?

After you regurgitated the ol' perfesser's BS in multiple places on usenet
without ever noticing it was based on an elementary error?

Tee-hee. You're a riot.


I remember, too, that your were quite taken by Michael Mann's glaring
fraud.

Get a clue.

Still clinging to the ol' hockey stick straw, aren't you, Matt?

You haven't been paying attention, have you?

Here's a clue or two for *you*:

In 2006 Congress mandated an investigation of Mann, et al.'s work by the
NRC. With a few reservations, the NRC's report endorsed the findings of
Mann et al, 1998 and Mann et al, 1999.

http://www.desmogblog.com/nrc-exoner...adian-skeptics

They certainly didn't find any fraud. Your calling Mann one is a lie.

And that was a long time ago. All subsequent proxy reconstructions
published by other scientists have produced graphs shaped like --guess
what?-- hockey sticks:

http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki...Comparison_png

Try to keep up.

Or don't; I don't care.

But don't think you can post your usual crap in here and not get called on
it.


--
Dan
T-182T at BFM