![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:22:23 -0900, Pete Brown wrote in
: If a conventional aircraft is in stable level flight and the stick is pulled back, all of the texts I have read indicate that the aircraft pitches up, rotating through the CG. Is this exactly correct or is it a very useful approximation good for all practical purposes? Most aircraft have the CG located slightly forward of the center of pressure ( CP or center of lift) for positive pitch stability. I was wondering if the actual point of rotation is displaced somewhat aft of the CG, someplace close to the CG but in fact some small distance towards the CP. When the aircraft is subject only to the force of gravity, any displacement will cause it to rotate around the cg but in flight its subject to gravity as well as the aerodynamic forces which act through the CP, suggesting to me that the point of rotation is not quite on the CG. That's an interesting question. I hadn't thought about it before. First let me say, that I'm not an aeronautical engineer, but intuitively I figure it this way. In stable, level flight lift (acting through the center of pressure) = weight (acting through the center of gravity), so it would seem that a downward force on the tail would cause the aircraft to rotate on its lateral axis through a point midway between the center of lift/pressure and center of gravity. But that's a guess, and it doesn't consider the displacement of the center of pressure forward with the increase in angle of attack. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you to all who responded and especially to Larry, Phil J, Jim L,
and Gerry. I am still not sure what the answer is but each response shed some light on the issue. Larry Dighera: This is what I originally thought but I didn't consider that in stable flight, the CG and Cp may be at the same point. That's an interesting question. I hadn't thought about it before. First let me say, that I'm not an aeronautical engineer, but intuitively I figure it this way. In stable, level flight lift (acting through the center of pressure) = weight (acting through the center of gravity), so it would seem that a downward force on the tail would cause the aircraft to rotate on its lateral axis through a point midway between the center of lift/pressure and center of gravity. But that's a guess, and it doesn't consider the displacement of the center of pressure forward with the increase in angle of attack. Phil J: Great thought experiment. Posed like Einstein used to. I am not an engineer, so I am going add to your question. Imagine that you had a couple of tall jack stands that you could place under the wings to elevate the airplane a foot or so off the ground. Let's say you place the stands under the wings just back from the CG such that you have to press down on the tail to keep the nosewheel off the ground. This is similar to the condition of flight since the center of lift is aft of the center of gravity. Now if you push down on the tail, the airplane will rotate about the center of lift. Wouldn't it work the same way in the air? Jim L: Key insight is in a regime of stabile flight, in which case, the cl and cg are at the same point. This makes the books correct (they all say the aircraft rotates through the CG and this would explain why its true in stable flight. As I understand it, the force of the tail plane's elevators typically moves the center of lift forward and backward along the airplane's axis as the elevators are moved up and down (as well as changing the lift magnitude a little - though that is secondary). One presumably enters stable flight when the center of lift is moved to coincide with the center of gravity. Thank you all again. -- Peter D. Brown http://home.gci.net/~pdb/ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/akmtnsoaring/ Going home after a long day http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1415/...22928754_b.jpg The fleet at Summit. Mt. McKinley is about 45nm away at 20,320 msl. http://farm1.static.flickr.com/187/4...cb8d2482_b.jpg The 170B at Bold near Eklutna Glacier http://farm1.static.flickr.com/168/4...a216d7bb75.jpg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
a question for the aeronautical engineers among us | Tina | Piloting | 10 | November 4th 07 12:56 PM |
Are flight engineers qualified to fly? | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 14 | January 23rd 07 07:39 PM |
Aerodynamic Drag | Kyle Boatright | Home Built | 7 | September 26th 05 03:34 AM |
Aerodynamic Simulation of Standard Cirrus Glider | Jim Hendrix | Soaring | 13 | November 9th 04 11:38 PM |
Airfoil aerodynamic simulator... | Thomas J. Paladino Jr. | Piloting | 4 | May 17th 04 02:41 PM |