All I wanted to do is try to fly on a 747!!!

Benjamin Dover wrote:
Judah wrote in
:

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Because it's nicer than flying in a smaller aircraft.
You on drugs, boy?


Even drugs can't explain MXSmoron's cretenous stupidity.


747 fuel will be very expensive soon
Oil too much. Must kiss Arab ass
George

This indirect taxation through inflated oil prices paid to
Saudi Arabia is having two extremely damaging effects on the
U.S.:

1) it is rapidly transferring control of our economy to
Saudi Arabia, one of the most totalitarian and economically
manipulative societies in the world.

2) it is preventing the desperately needed appropriate use
of a gas tax. We need for gas to be even more expensive than
it already is, in order to foster alternatives and we need
this sooner rater than later. It is only the uses to which
it is currently being put that is so bad. (Iraq war, the
creation of various powerful and unaccountable (to the
public) tools of repression (Blackwater, etc.), the
enrichment of various anti-democracy groups, etc.)

“The Arabs have taken billions of dollars out of this
country, and now they must put it back. … It is ebb and
flow, tidal gravity…. There are no nations, there are no
peoples. There is only one vast and immense, interwoven,
multi-national dominion of petro-dollars. … There is no
America. There is no ‘democracy.’ The world is a business,
one vast and ecumenical holding company, for whom all men
will work.”

Slug writes:

747 fuel will be very expensive soon

It uses the same fuel that other jet airliners use. And a single 747 with 500
pax is more efficient than five 737s with 100 pax.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Slug writes:

747 fuel will be very expensive soon

It uses the same fuel that other jet airliners use.

Nope, it runs on bug farts.

Bertie

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Slug writes:

747 fuel will be very expensive soon

It uses the same fuel that other jet airliners use. And a single 747
with 500 pax is more efficient than five 737s with 100 pax.

Only if all 500 seats are full.

Judah writes:

Only if all 500 seats are full.

They are just as likely to be full as the seats of a 737.

Mxsmanic wrote:
Judah writes:

Only if all 500 seats are full.

They are just as likely to be full as the seats of a 737.

What an idiot.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Judah writes:

Only if all 500 seats are full.

They are just as likely to be full as the seats of a 737.


So what fjukkwit?

Wlaking would be even cheaper?

Or would it?



Bertie

Hi,

In article ,
Bertie the wrote:
Wlaking would be even cheaper?

Or would it?

You're forgetting. It's almost impossible to walk anywhere without spending
money.

(c) Mx - 2008

Andy

Andy Hawkins wrote in
:

Hi,

In article ,
Bertie the wrote:
Wlaking would be even cheaper?

Or would it?

You're forgetting. It's almost impossible to walk anywhere without
spending money.

(c) Mx - 2008


Good excuse to sit in front of the TV.

Oh wait! Do they have a licence for that in France?



Bertie

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Judah writes:

Only if all 500 seats are full.

They are just as likely to be full as the seats of a 737.

If 160 people want to go from JFK to ORD on a Thursday morning at 8am, they
will fill a 737, but they will consume less than 1/3 of the seats on a 747.