![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Ron Wanttaja says...
Well, the local courts haven't been any friendlier to him. Campbell or his business entities (US AVIATOR, Airedale, Aero-Media, ANN, etc.) have been involved in at least 27 lawsuits. Of the 27 I found records of, he's never won a suit he's filed, and, of those filed against him, he's lost seven and had the judge rule in his favor only once. 27!!! that's more then I thought he had and he has the nerve to berate me because I threatened to sue G Conn LOL!!! Campbell was the plaintiff in ten. He outright lost two, SnF #1 and the Pulsar case. Of the remainder, three were apparently settled out-of-court, "settled out of court" I guess by jaun the toadies reasoning zoom has "successfully sued" 3 times which by the same jaun logic means... he lost.... Campbell's record as defendant is worse. Of the 17, he lost seven outright ("Lost" as in the judge ruling that he owed the plaintiff money). One even included a garnishment action against Campbell. Two were settled out-of-court (in one, the Airedale bankruptcy, Campbell agreed to pay $50,000). Others were dropped for various reasons. Hmmm wonder what "logic" jaun would produce for those :-) zoom didn't lose ....Chuck lied. LOL!!! would seem jauns hero has feet of clay and is sue happy. All this and zoom has the nerve to try and judge other people what a phoney . I hope his advertizers start reading RAH so they can see the kind of person they are enabling with their ad money. Wonder how they'll feel going to SnF knowing the guy they are supporting with their ad money is sueing SnF.I for one won't support any of his advertizers and I will tell them why if they ask. His one victory was when a suit by an apparent vendor was dismissed with prejudice: STAR PRESS & SPALDING PUBLISHERS vs. CAMPBELL, JAMES KINDRED SPIRIT PRESS, Polk County case 2000SC-002167-0000-00. That's the one he'll toot all over the place . Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret "evil didn't prosper because good men spoke and evil is still nuts" anon |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
..
His one victory was when a suit by an apparent vendor was dismissed with prejudice: STAR PRESS & SPALDING PUBLISHERS vs. CAMPBELL, JAMES KINDRED SPIRIT PRESS, Polk County case 2000SC-002167-0000-00. That's the one he'll toot all over the place . Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= Hey Chuck; I know one case that he lost,the defendant didn't even have a lawyer.He filed twice and went through five attorneys.HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! If you run into El Pollo Loco say hello for me. Frank M.Hitlaw Jakarta,Indonesia |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Frank Hitlaw
says... Hi Frank (my partner in the Great Chicken Heist) Do you still have a copy of the lawsuit that zoom filed against you? I'd like to have a copy for for a project I'm working on. I wonder if your suit was included in the 27 that Ron W posted. Maybe there's more out there that we don't know about. If he filed twice I wonder if that counts for 2 ? LOL!!! Did he ever write about sueing SnF on ANN or is he keeping it a secret? See ya Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret aka "el Pollo Loco " "evil didn't prosper because good men spoke and evil was still nuts" anon Hey Chuck; I know one case that he lost,the defendant didn't even have a lawyer.He filed twice and went through five attorneys.HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! If you run into El Pollo Loco say hello for me. Frank M.Hitlaw Jakarta,Indonesia |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3 Oct 2003 03:13:52 -0700, ChuckSlusarczyk
wrote: Do you still have a copy of the lawsuit that zoom filed against you? I'd like to have a copy for for a project I'm working on. I wonder if your suit was included in the 27 that Ron W posted. Maybe there's more out there that we don't know about. If he filed twice I wonder if that counts for 2 ? LOL!!! No, I didn't count Frank's because I have found no data on it. His name doesn't come up when I search the Polk County Clerk of Court's online database (which only goes back nominally ten years). That was the source of most of my information: http://www.polk-county.net/clerk/clerk.html This provides a basic summary of the papers filed in each listed case, with, in some instances, a final listing of disposition. A more interesting search engine is the Polk County public record site: http://ori2.polk-county.net/wb_or1/or_sch_1.asp Like the Clerk site, you have to search for business names ("Airedale", etc.) as well. Or you can search for known defendants, such as "Pulsar". This site has actual digital copies of the papers filed in many of these cases, and a lot more, like tax liens. Sometimes, cases from other counties get mentioned in papers filed in Polk... that's how I found data on the lawsuit against Don Jones/Jim Campbell/AVIATOR INTERNATIONAL and Transcontinental Printing vs. Airedale Press. This site is also handy to determine if a lawsuit against "James Campbell" is indeed against Zoom. Happy surfing. :-) Ron Wanttaja |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ron Wanttaja" wrote
Polk County Clerk of Court's online database (which only goes back nominally ten years). So that means 27 suits in 10 years.... or 2-3 per year? That's disgusting. Someone so litigous has clearly lost their rights to sue. Eric |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 18:41:56 GMT, "Eric Miller" wrote:
"Ron Wanttaja" wrote Polk County Clerk of Court's online database (which only goes back nominally ten years). So that means 27 suits in 10 years.... or 2-3 per year? That's disgusting. Someone so litigous has clearly lost their rights to sue. Well, that's 27 suits involving him, but he was the plaintiff in "only" a bit more than a third of them. However, when you add up the total number of people and companies who have been sued by him or his companies, you do end up with about that many. Not including the RAH-15 case, the list includes two managing editors of US AVIATOR, at least five companies (or owners of companies) who were former advertisers, several individuals or companies I don't recognize (Kropp Enterprises, Bottom Line Sales, Steven Mann, Aircraft Refinishing Systems, Harry Smiley). And Sun-N-Fun twice, of course. Now, you add the RAH-15 case to that, and the totals come to: Two managing editors (Ken Cooke and Laurel Ramey) One other employee (Alan Staats, RAH-15) Two associate editors (the position is merely a title, no salary or employment is involved...RAH-15 defendants Vern Barr and myself fall in this category. But as I've mentioned in the past, I was never *asked* if I wanted to be an associate editor) Eight former advertisers (Three RAH-15, counting Richard Riley/Berkut) Nine other RAH-15 co-defendants. Five individuals or companies I don't know well enough to classify. One non-profit organization (Sun-N-Fun...twice!) That's 28 people or companies that have had to defend themselves against a lawsuit by Jim Campbell or his controlled companies. Most were dismissed for lack of service, or lack of prosecution (e.g., Campbell filed the suit and just walked away). Three settled out of court. Ron Wanttaja |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A minor correction...
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 05:56:17 GMT, Ron Wanttaja wrote: :Not including the RAH-15 case, the list includes two managing editors of US :AVIATOR, at least five companies (or owners of companies) who were former :advertisers, several individuals or companies I don't recognize (Kropp :Enterprises, Bottom Line Sales, Steven Mann, Aircraft Refinishing Systems, :Harry Smiley). And Sun-N-Fun twice, of course. : :Now, you add the RAH-15 case to that, and the totals come to: : :Two managing editors (Ken Cooke and Laurel Ramey) Didn't Judy Wood ever sue? :One other employee (Alan Staats, RAH-15) :Two associate editors (the position is merely a title, no salary or : employment is involved...RAH-15 defendants Vern Barr and myself : fall in this category. But as I've mentioned in the past, : I was never *asked* if I wanted to be an associate editor) :Eight former advertisers (Three RAH-15, counting Richard Riley/Berkut) We never advertised. Probably would have, but we were the subject of a pre-emptive zooming. :Nine other RAH-15 co-defendants. :Five individuals or companies I don't know well enough to classify. :One non-profit organization (Sun-N-Fun...twice!) And, of course, he was sued by the Boy's and Girl's club. That had to hurt. :That's 28 people or companies that have had to defend themselves against a :lawsuit by Jim Campbell or his controlled companies. Most were dismissed :for lack of service, or lack of prosecution (e.g., Campbell filed the suit :and just walked away). Three settled out of court. Too bad it's not enough to get him classified as a vexatious litigant. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Ron Wanttaja
writes: This site is also handy to determine if a lawsuit against "James Campbell" is indeed against Zoom. Happy surfing. :-) Ron Wanttaja A couple of interesting points about his suit against Pulsar. Campbell used Sun-N-Fun as his personal serving ground even though he was banned from the location. He still managed to have Pulsar served with his lawsuit against them at the 2002 Sun-N-Fun event. The intent of course was to force them to pay up since it would be cheaper than having to take the time and fly all the way from California to Florida for the trial. I don't think he believed the owner of Pulsar would fight it and would just pay up. Surprise, he was wrong and the owner of Pulsar was not going to be intimadated by Campbell's stupid suit. This was also one of the reasons that Sun-N-Fun had barred him, he had done this before. Bob Reed www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site) KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress.... "Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice, pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!" (M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ChuckSlusarczyk wrote in message ...
In article , Frank Hitlaw says... Hi Frank (my partner in the Great Chicken Heist) Do you still have a copy of the lawsuit that zoom filed against you? I'd like to have a copy for for a project I'm working on. I wonder if your suit was included in the 27 that Ron W posted. Maybe there's more out there that we don't know about. If he filed twice I wonder if that counts for 2 ? LOL!!! Did he ever write about sueing SnF on ANN or is he keeping it a secret? See ya Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret aka "el Pollo Loco " "evil didn't prosper because good men spoke and evil was still nuts" anon Hey Chuck; I know one case that he lost,the defendant didn't even have a lawyer.He filed twice and went through five attorneys.HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! If you run into El Pollo Loco say hello for me. Frank M.Hitlaw Jakarta,Indonesia ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chuck; His lawsuit against me was filed in Highlands County, Florida Sebring is the County seat. He refiled with a second attorney I don't remember the exact date but the original was filed in April 1993.I have the originals and will send them to you when I get back to the States toward the end of the month. In 1991 he filed assault and battery charges against me in criminal court in Polk County,As with civil suit he lost. The only reason that there was no assault was that the cowardly SOB ran from me and I couldn't catch him.He even said that he beat feet away from me in his rag.Or you might say as juan does he picked up his skirt and ran away!!To quote a great chicken thief "what a phoney". Frank M.Hitlaw, Executive Assistant to El Pollo Loco (Far East Division) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank M.Hitlaw
Jakarta,Indonesia Frank, Why is Indonesia the "hot bed" of credit card fraud in the world. My company almost got stung for $5,000 because we were ignorant of the problem in general and Indonesia specifically. Fortunately we stopped delivery JIT due to some red flags which made me suspicious, then I did some checking. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|