![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Alan Minyard
writes On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 17:49:35 GMT, lid (Goran Larsson) wrote: There is no relation between these two statements. No one, not even you, have a clue to what the US GDP would have been today if the US had gone through with the decision to go metric. What I am saying is that, if the countries that use the metric (misnomer) system were so superior, they would be the leading economies, they are not. If the US had "gone metric" there would have been significant economic damage for a long period of time. Why? It's hardly catastrophic. British industry had far worse problems than "changing units", for an example. Having been trained in both, it really is a lot easier to do serious work in SI than to try to work out whether a reference to "pounds" means pounds, poundals or slugs... On the other hand, we still buy beer in pints (even if it's officially ..568 litre measures) and measure distance in miles. One of the more interesting summer work placements I had was rigging up a gas-turbine engine to run on a novel fuel. One challenge was simply trying to cope with the multiple screw threads used for the holes already drilled and tapped: some US, some Whitworth, some ISO. If the US wants its measurement system to prosper, you need to make it a _lot_ easier to find the relevant taps, dies and fasteners. Muttering that the rest of the world ought to do it your way is useless: make your standard easy to use or see how young engineers drill and tap new holes for threads they _can_ get easily. At one time gasoline stations sold fuel by the liter and speed limits were posted in KPH. The citizens of the US did not like, and refused to tolerate, such usages. At what point does this stop being a noble defence of fine units, and start being King Canute ordering the rising tide to retreat? -- When you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite. W S Churchill Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() At what point does this stop being a noble defence of fine units, and start being King Canute ordering the rising tide to retreat? Well that depends on whether it is rising in feet or meters :-))) OK, end of thread. Al Minyard |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bush's guard record | JDKAHN | Home Built | 13 | October 3rd 04 09:38 PM |
Space Elevator | Big John | Home Built | 111 | July 21st 04 04:31 PM |
U.S. Troops, Aircraft a Hit at Moscow Air Show | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | August 28th 03 10:04 PM |