A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Manufacturers estimates for maintenance



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 20th 08, 08:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Peter Clark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 538
Default Manufacturers estimates for maintenance

On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:47:08 -0800 (PST), John
wrote:

On Feb 11, 2:39*pm, SabbaSolo wrote:
Do Piper or Cessna publish estimates for maintenance work, that repair
shops use for charging or estimating?

In Europe, many car manufacturers use estimates like this for car
repairs and maintenance work. *Say the manufacturer specifies 45 min
for an oil change. *That is what you are charged for, whether the
change takes them 20 min because they work fast, or 1.5hrs because the
filter broke off when they were removing it.

If this doesn't exist, how does one estimate aircraft routine
maintenance (like 100hr inspections) or repair (like replacing a
vacuum pump)?



Piper and Cessna et al do have standard times for routine maintenance
but they do not publish them. You have to be a licensed maintenance
provider to get the information. The manufacturer's also publish
times for various service bulletin work as well. Most maintenance
providers end up wondering just how they arrive at their estimates.


We already know. They tech writer who types up the SB gets data from
a team of factory people who work these things day in/day out in
mostly unassembled form and they say "It should only take blah to
get at that part", completey ignoring that it takes 9 times longer in
the real world when the aircraft is fully put together.

What's even more fun is when the procedures they put out on the
maintenance manuals are physically impossible. For example, replacing
the CO detector in a G1000 Cessna. They call in the MM for you to
pull the MFD and unscrew the 3 screws holding the detector in place.
They don't mention that this is physically impssible because behind
the MFD is a large rack and cage assembly where they put the GEA, GDL,
and some other rackmounted componants I can't recall offhand making
access to the bracket outside of the cage that they mounted the CO
detector unit to impossible through that route.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aircraft manufacturers and their reputations Mxsmanic Piloting 42 October 28th 06 05:31 PM
Bigger Battery holders from glider manufacturers Gary Emerson Soaring 5 May 31st 06 07:53 AM
final glide estimates bagmaker Soaring 44 March 16th 06 11:57 PM
RAND report raps Raptor program estimates Mike Naval Aviation 1 October 19th 05 08:37 PM
Small aircraft exhaust silencer manufacturers? Seppo Sipilä General Aviation 14 September 27th 04 10:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.