![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 Mar, 17:36, Thomas Borchert wrote:
Orval, Where in hell was ATC's head when they directed the plane to a runway with that severe a crosswind in the first place? The options are 23 and 33 (this is my home drome). With the wind between 280 and 290, you figure out the difference in crosswind component. It's not that much. But 23 has a CAT IIIb (I think) ILS, while 33 is localizer only. Also, why did the pilot accept that runway? See above. Is it the German acceptance of authority? No. Probably just the lack of a sense of humor. Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Yesterdays storm in Hamburg | Ron | Aviation Photos | 11 | March 10th 08 01:37 AM |
Crosswind landing control.. | Dan | Piloting | 53 | December 31st 06 04:48 AM |
Crosswind Landing Videos | Danny Deger | Piloting | 0 | December 30th 06 04:58 PM |
Crosswind landing | Ron Webb | Home Built | 23 | June 10th 06 03:43 AM |
Tailwheel Crosswind Landing | Piloting | 32 | December 6th 04 02:42 AM |