![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And if you look at the markings it is indeed F for Freddie, as mentioned in
the last clip I posted. Sorry for not posting the things about the reunion by they way, i should have but did not have time when i made the original post. So on one hand we have the recording, the photograph and the 207 squadron association all of which seem to add up and support each other. On the other we have the lack of engine noise but without any proof that the BBC were in fact unable to deal with it, just a hunch. If you still think its a fake then we'll have to agree to disagree, but there is a weight of evidence to prove otherwise. "Stolly" wrote in message ... As you correctly point out the Manchester did have that row of windows. As i am sure you also know the Lanc is a very close relative of the Manchester and early Lancasters were uncompleted Manchesters with new wings etc. So many early Lancasters started life as Manchesters and did indeed have the windows. Since this is 1943 it is entirely correct that early Lancasters were still in service. "Gord Beaman" wrote in message ... "Stolly" wrote: It was recorded on a disk not tape. If you are convinced it is not real then you are also convinced that A. The picture of them stood outside the aircraft is faked. Hardly now...why does it follow?..don't be silly sir... Incidentally, although it certainly isn't any kind of proof but our Lancs didn't have that row of small windows all down along the stbd side of the a/c, but if you Google for the 'Manchester Bomber' it does, exactly like these. Are you sure that these two guys aren't standing beside a Manchester?. There's not enough of the a/c showing for me to tell. B. They faked it in less than 12 hours since it was broadcast later the same day. And that sounds impossible for the BBC??...as I said, don't be silly sir... C The BBC and Imperial War Museum, to this day, are in on the conspiracy. D. 207 Squadron Association are also in on the conspiracy since the had a renunion in 1983 and invited the BBC reporter there as reported here http://www.207squadron.rafinfo.org.uk/default.htm . They got together 40 years later for the express purpose of remembering the recording and broadcasting of this recording. Are you REALLY suggesting that they got together 40 years later to remember something that never happened ? Seriously you are ignoring all the above in favour of not believing that the BBC knew how to filter noise. They were a world class broadcasting service. You would certainly imagine they had sound engineers that knew what they were doing. I have the whole 40 minute recording from the IWM sound archive. I payed £20 for it. Are you saying that I should report the Imperial War Museum for commiting fraud in that they are knowingly selling faked recordings ? Or perhaps a museum with a international reputation has been duped themselves and that you know better based on a hunch that the engines are not loud enough ? I know that this looks bad for me...but I find it very difficult to believe that the announcer is sitting in a Lanc as he talks about "...moving down the runway and just now we lift off and climb away..." etc. If you ever actually sat in a Lancaster during takeoff you'd know...the noise is deafeningly loud...deafening... Literally. The Canadian government pays me a 35% hearing disability pension for listening to that deafening sound (for about 575 hours) along with the exposure that I suffered on other less loud a/c since. You have to take some of the responsibility for this too Stolly, you made the barefaced claim that it was authentic with no cite at all. This time you supplied a cite but didn't point out any connection to this recording in that article. I searched all through your article and found this somewhere in there (I believe it was in 'A brief history') quote: The famous BBC recording of a raid on Berlin, commentary by Wynford Vaughan-Thomas, was made on 3rd September 1943 with Flt Lt Ken Letford's crew in EM-F for Freddie. unquote So there you are...do I think that it's authentic?...well, I have no doubt that it was made during the war, and probably for PR reasons so it certainly has value (had?)...do I think that it used the talents of the flight crew?...sure. Do I believe that there's some conspiricy?...nah. Do I think that it was RECORDED IN FLIGHT on a LANCASTER?...sorry, I just cannot believe that. As talented as the BBC techs might have been, the 'white noise' of four Merlins at full bellow is fearsome to behold yet there's almost no evidence of it here (I can occasionally hear what might be some faint engine sounds 'way in the background). The announcer sounds relatively calm and is speaking relatively quietly, certainly not the case if he were actually shouting to be heard above the unholy racket of 4 Merlins. It's human nature to shout when you cannot hear...notice hearing impaired people, they speak loudly because they can't hear themselves very well. -- -Gord. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stolly" wrote:
And if you look at the markings it is indeed F for Freddie, as mentioned in the last clip I posted. Yes indeed, I noticed that too, and yes it's true that the Lanc was 'sort of' derived from the Manchester...matter of fact I found a Lancaster with that row of small windows down it's 'port' side (in Google), but couldn't find a pic of the stbd side. I do know that 'ours' didn't have them on either side, mind you, this was in the 'fifties'. Sorry for not posting the things about the reunion by they way, i should have but did not have time when i made the original post. Not fault finding here, just a statement. So on one hand we have the recording, the photograph and the 207 squadron association all of which seem to add up and support each other. On the other we have the lack of engine noise but without any proof that the BBC were in fact unable to deal with it, just a hunch. If you still think its a fake then we'll have to agree to disagree, but there is a weight of evidence to prove otherwise. Well, I realize that it's not 'proof' at all, but I really remember a lot about the Lanc Stolly, it was my first aircraft (as a flight engineer) and it's quite remarkable how much I 'do' remember. Mind you, I don't remember what I had for breakfast today (or whether!) but I clearly remember the exact fuel tank quantities of all 8 tanks, the 'pretakeoff, posttakeoff, prelanding and postlanding checklists (they were 'memory items', we had no written checklists as now) and scads of other facts, one of which was the amount of noise. Mind you, I was only 21 then too!... In any event, it's been a pleasure to discuss something with someone who feels strongly about something without someone resorting to fisticuffs almost. Thanks for that sir. Cheers "Stolly" wrote in message ... As you correctly point out the Manchester did have that row of windows. As i am sure you also know the Lanc is a very close relative of the Manchester and early Lancasters were uncompleted Manchesters with new wings etc. So many early Lancasters started life as Manchesters and did indeed have the windows. Since this is 1943 it is entirely correct that early Lancasters were still in service. "Gord Beaman" wrote in message ... "Stolly" wrote: It was recorded on a disk not tape. If you are convinced it is not real then you are also convinced that A. The picture of them stood outside the aircraft is faked. Hardly now...why does it follow?..don't be silly sir... Incidentally, although it certainly isn't any kind of proof but our Lancs didn't have that row of small windows all down along the stbd side of the a/c, but if you Google for the 'Manchester Bomber' it does, exactly like these. Are you sure that these two guys aren't standing beside a Manchester?. There's not enough of the a/c showing for me to tell. B. They faked it in less than 12 hours since it was broadcast later the same day. And that sounds impossible for the BBC??...as I said, don't be silly sir... C The BBC and Imperial War Museum, to this day, are in on the conspiracy. D. 207 Squadron Association are also in on the conspiracy since the had a renunion in 1983 and invited the BBC reporter there as reported here http://www.207squadron.rafinfo.org.uk/default.htm . They got together 40 years later for the express purpose of remembering the recording and broadcasting of this recording. Are you REALLY suggesting that they got together 40 years later to remember something that never happened ? Seriously you are ignoring all the above in favour of not believing that the BBC knew how to filter noise. They were a world class broadcasting service. You would certainly imagine they had sound engineers that knew what they were doing. I have the whole 40 minute recording from the IWM sound archive. I payed £20 for it. Are you saying that I should report the Imperial War Museum for commiting fraud in that they are knowingly selling faked recordings ? Or perhaps a museum with a international reputation has been duped themselves and that you know better based on a hunch that the engines are not loud enough ? I know that this looks bad for me...but I find it very difficult to believe that the announcer is sitting in a Lanc as he talks about "...moving down the runway and just now we lift off and climb away..." etc. If you ever actually sat in a Lancaster during takeoff you'd know...the noise is deafeningly loud...deafening... Literally. The Canadian government pays me a 35% hearing disability pension for listening to that deafening sound (for about 575 hours) along with the exposure that I suffered on other less loud a/c since. You have to take some of the responsibility for this too Stolly, you made the barefaced claim that it was authentic with no cite at all. This time you supplied a cite but didn't point out any connection to this recording in that article. I searched all through your article and found this somewhere in there (I believe it was in 'A brief history') quote: The famous BBC recording of a raid on Berlin, commentary by Wynford Vaughan-Thomas, was made on 3rd September 1943 with Flt Lt Ken Letford's crew in EM-F for Freddie. unquote So there you are...do I think that it's authentic?...well, I have no doubt that it was made during the war, and probably for PR reasons so it certainly has value (had?)...do I think that it used the talents of the flight crew?...sure. Do I believe that there's some conspiricy?...nah. Do I think that it was RECORDED IN FLIGHT on a LANCASTER?...sorry, I just cannot believe that. As talented as the BBC techs might have been, the 'white noise' of four Merlins at full bellow is fearsome to behold yet there's almost no evidence of it here (I can occasionally hear what might be some faint engine sounds 'way in the background). The announcer sounds relatively calm and is speaking relatively quietly, certainly not the case if he were actually shouting to be heard above the unholy racket of 4 Merlins. It's human nature to shout when you cannot hear...notice hearing impaired people, they speak loudly because they can't hear themselves very well. -- -Gord. -- -Gord. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Likewise a pleasure to talk to someone who knows the subject well, first
hand no less ![]() Cheers ! "Gord Beaman" wrote in message ... "Stolly" wrote: And if you look at the markings it is indeed F for Freddie, as mentioned in the last clip I posted. Yes indeed, I noticed that too, and yes it's true that the Lanc was 'sort of' derived from the Manchester...matter of fact I found a Lancaster with that row of small windows down it's 'port' side (in Google), but couldn't find a pic of the stbd side. I do know that 'ours' didn't have them on either side, mind you, this was in the 'fifties'. Sorry for not posting the things about the reunion by they way, i should have but did not have time when i made the original post. Not fault finding here, just a statement. So on one hand we have the recording, the photograph and the 207 squadron association all of which seem to add up and support each other. On the other we have the lack of engine noise but without any proof that the BBC were in fact unable to deal with it, just a hunch. If you still think its a fake then we'll have to agree to disagree, but there is a weight of evidence to prove otherwise. Well, I realize that it's not 'proof' at all, but I really remember a lot about the Lanc Stolly, it was my first aircraft (as a flight engineer) and it's quite remarkable how much I 'do' remember. Mind you, I don't remember what I had for breakfast today (or whether!) but I clearly remember the exact fuel tank quantities of all 8 tanks, the 'pretakeoff, posttakeoff, prelanding and postlanding checklists (they were 'memory items', we had no written checklists as now) and scads of other facts, one of which was the amount of noise. Mind you, I was only 21 then too!... In any event, it's been a pleasure to discuss something with someone who feels strongly about something without someone resorting to fisticuffs almost. Thanks for that sir. Cheers "Stolly" wrote in message ... As you correctly point out the Manchester did have that row of windows. As i am sure you also know the Lanc is a very close relative of the Manchester and early Lancasters were uncompleted Manchesters with new wings etc. So many early Lancasters started life as Manchesters and did indeed have the windows. Since this is 1943 it is entirely correct that early Lancasters were still in service. "Gord Beaman" wrote in message ... "Stolly" wrote: It was recorded on a disk not tape. If you are convinced it is not real then you are also convinced that A. The picture of them stood outside the aircraft is faked. Hardly now...why does it follow?..don't be silly sir... Incidentally, although it certainly isn't any kind of proof but our Lancs didn't have that row of small windows all down along the stbd side of the a/c, but if you Google for the 'Manchester Bomber' it does, exactly like these. Are you sure that these two guys aren't standing beside a Manchester?. There's not enough of the a/c showing for me to tell. B. They faked it in less than 12 hours since it was broadcast later the same day. And that sounds impossible for the BBC??...as I said, don't be silly sir... C The BBC and Imperial War Museum, to this day, are in on the conspiracy. D. 207 Squadron Association are also in on the conspiracy since the had a renunion in 1983 and invited the BBC reporter there as reported here http://www.207squadron.rafinfo.org.uk/default.htm . They got together 40 years later for the express purpose of remembering the recording and broadcasting of this recording. Are you REALLY suggesting that they got together 40 years later to remember something that never happened ? Seriously you are ignoring all the above in favour of not believing that the BBC knew how to filter noise. They were a world class broadcasting service. You would certainly imagine they had sound engineers that knew what they were doing. I have the whole 40 minute recording from the IWM sound archive. I payed £20 for it. Are you saying that I should report the Imperial War Museum for commiting fraud in that they are knowingly selling faked recordings ? Or perhaps a museum with a international reputation has been duped themselves and that you know better based on a hunch that the engines are not loud enough ? I know that this looks bad for me...but I find it very difficult to believe that the announcer is sitting in a Lanc as he talks about "...moving down the runway and just now we lift off and climb away..." etc. If you ever actually sat in a Lancaster during takeoff you'd know...the noise is deafeningly loud...deafening... Literally. The Canadian government pays me a 35% hearing disability pension for listening to that deafening sound (for about 575 hours) along with the exposure that I suffered on other less loud a/c since. You have to take some of the responsibility for this too Stolly, you made the barefaced claim that it was authentic with no cite at all. This time you supplied a cite but didn't point out any connection to this recording in that article. I searched all through your article and found this somewhere in there (I believe it was in 'A brief history') quote: The famous BBC recording of a raid on Berlin, commentary by Wynford Vaughan-Thomas, was made on 3rd September 1943 with Flt Lt Ken Letford's crew in EM-F for Freddie. unquote So there you are...do I think that it's authentic?...well, I have no doubt that it was made during the war, and probably for PR reasons so it certainly has value (had?)...do I think that it used the talents of the flight crew?...sure. Do I believe that there's some conspiricy?...nah. Do I think that it was RECORDED IN FLIGHT on a LANCASTER?...sorry, I just cannot believe that. As talented as the BBC techs might have been, the 'white noise' of four Merlins at full bellow is fearsome to behold yet there's almost no evidence of it here (I can occasionally hear what might be some faint engine sounds 'way in the background). The announcer sounds relatively calm and is speaking relatively quietly, certainly not the case if he were actually shouting to be heard above the unholy racket of 4 Merlins. It's human nature to shout when you cannot hear...notice hearing impaired people, they speak loudly because they can't hear themselves very well. -- -Gord. -- -Gord. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
King KMA 20 TSO Audio Input | tony roberts | Home Built | 10 | November 20th 04 06:06 AM |
Audio recording of RAF Lancaster under nightfighter attack | Stolly | Military Aviation | 65 | October 8th 03 01:54 AM |
Bu$h Jr's Iran-Contra -- The Pentagone's Reign of Terror | PirateJohn | Military Aviation | 1 | September 6th 03 10:05 AM |
Lancaster returns to AWM | Graeme Hogan | Military Aviation | 2 | July 24th 03 01:08 PM |
Letter from USS Liberty Survivor | Grantland | Military Aviation | 1 | July 17th 03 03:44 PM |