F22 air dams/strakes: the definitive answer.

On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 08:55:16 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:

So what I wrote in the first place is correct.

"You men like the 8 inchers added to the F-22 wings? "

Uh that would be N-O. Thanks for playing P-O-S-E-R.




Of course I would not necessarily believe lockmart that the titanium "is
working" as the program has a history of hiding deficiencies. Those
deficiencies covered up include these same tail cracks, which wa a story
broken by Reuters 6 months after the delamination was discovered.

\

Yeah and we didn't land on the moon and we have aliens locked up in
hangar 18 right next to the
do-take-photos-of-them-or-you'll-go-to-jail F-22s with the strakes.




The only way to know if the third attempt to fix the F-22's tail is to fly
the airplane 500 hours.


Sans strakes. Just like every other solution they've implemented.

"Scott Ferrin" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 08:55:16 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:

So what I wrote in the first place is correct.

"You men like the 8 inchers added to the F-22 wings? "

That is what Lockmart said publicly about their airplane.

Now we have Lockmart are claiming the titanium will not be strike three on
the F-22's tail issues, but the history of the program indicates there is no
reason to believe them.

Tarver Engineering wrote:

"Scott Ferrin" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 08:55:16 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:

So what I wrote in the first place is correct.

"You men like the 8 inchers added to the F-22 wings? "

That is what Lockmart said publicly about their airplane.

cite please.

redc1c4,
you lack the credibility to make unsupported statements of fact.
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."

Army Officer's Guide

"redc1c4" wrote in message
...
Tarver Engineering wrote:

"Scott Ferrin" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 08:55:16 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:

So what I wrote in the first place is correct.

"You men like the 8 inchers added to the F-22 wings? "

That is what Lockmart said publicly about their airplane.

cite please.

No.

I don't have any need, or desire, to convence clueless socks of anything.
Although your quote from lockmart is interesting, it is very far from being
anything difinitive, as lockmart has already been caught lying several times
WRT the F-22.

On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:29:07 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


"redc1c4" wrote in message
. ..
Tarver Engineering wrote:

"Scott Ferrin" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 08:55:16 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:

So what I wrote in the first place is correct.

"You men like the 8 inchers added to the F-22 wings? "

That is what Lockmart said publicly about their airplane.

cite please.

No.

I don't have any need, or desire, to convence clueless socks of anything.
Although your quote from lockmart is interesting, it is very far from being
anything difinitive, as lockmart has already been caught lying several times
WRT the F-22.

Yeah we already knew you couldn't prove anything you've said about
this. I'd have thought you'd at least have had the balls to admit it
since it's obvious you don't know your head from your ass on this one
but no, typically Tarver: a no nads, know nothing, poser.

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"redc1c4" wrote in message
...
Tarver Engineering wrote:

"Scott Ferrin" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 08:55:16 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:

So what I wrote in the first place is correct.

"You men like the 8 inchers added to the F-22 wings? "

That is what Lockmart said publicly about their airplane.

cite please.

No.

I don't have any need, or desire, to convence clueless socks of anything.
Although your quote from lockmart is interesting, it is very far from being
anything difinitive, as lockmart has already been caught lying several times
WRT the F-22.

For those unfamiliar with the more esoteric meanings of Tarverese,
this translates as, "I got caught in a lie again, but I'll be damned
if I'll ever admit it." It is located in the Tarverise-English
Translation dictionary, along with "optical nuke", "splaps",
"recoiless guns in AC-130's", etc.

Brooks