|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
November 17th 03, 04:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"John R Weiss" wrote in message news:B7Ztb.171248$9E1.880881@attbi_s52... "Tarver Engineering" wrote... At least on single-engine birds; some twins may have had counter-rotating props, but I don't think they operated from carrier decks all that much. What, like a P-3? Not single-engine, not a twin, no counter-rotating props, and never operated from a carrier... Never? LOL 
|
|
#2
November 17th 03, 08:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Tarver Engineering" wrote...
What, like a P-3? Not single-engine, not a twin, no counter-rotating props, and never operated from a carrier... Never? LOL The P-3 Orion? Never.
|
|
#3
November 17th 03, 08:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"John R Weiss" wrote in message news:l7aub.170253$mZ5.1193885@attbi_s54... "Tarver Engineering" wrote... What, like a P-3? Not single-engine, not a twin, no counter-rotating props, and never operated from a carrier... Never? LOL The P-3 Orion? Never. OK then.
|
|
#4
November 17th 03, 09:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in
: "John R Weiss" wrote in message news:B7Ztb.171248$9E1.880881@attbi_s52... "Tarver Engineering" wrote... At least on single-engine birds; some twins may have had counter-rotating props, but I don't think they operated from carrier decks all that much. What, like a P-3? Not single-engine, not a twin, no counter-rotating props, and never operated from a carrier... Never? LOL I assume you have some sort of evidence that a 140,000lb airplane that needs 4,000+ft of runway was somehow able to operate off of a carrier, right?
|
|
#5
November 17th 03, 10:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Seraphim" wrote...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote: What, like a P-3? Not single-engine, not a twin, no counter-rotating props, and never operated from a carrier... Never? LOL I assume you have some sort of evidence that a 140,000lb airplane that needs 4,000+ft of runway was somehow able to operate off of a carrier, right? Lack of evidence never stopped Tarver from posting drivel...
|
|
#6
November 17th 03, 10:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"John R Weiss" wrote in message news:bSbub.175559$ao4.582418@attbi_s51... "Seraphim" wrote... "Tarver Engineering" wrote: What, like a P-3? Not single-engine, not a twin, no counter-rotating props, and never operated from a carrier... Never? LOL I assume you have some sort of evidence that a 140,000lb airplane that needs 4,000+ft of runway was somehow able to operate off of a carrier, right? Lack of evidence never stopped Tarver from posting drivel... Weiss once again misses a subtle reference and craps himself.
|
|
#7
November 18th 03, 07:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "John R Weiss" wrote in message news:bSbub.175559$ao4.582418@attbi_s51... "Seraphim" wrote... "Tarver Engineering" wrote: What, like a P-3? Not single-engine, not a twin, no counter-rotating props, and never operated from a carrier... Never? LOL I assume you have some sort of evidence that a 140,000lb airplane that needs 4,000+ft of runway was somehow able to operate off of a carrier, right? Lack of evidence never stopped Tarver from posting drivel... Weiss once again misses a subtle reference and craps himself. Well, you obviously are thinking of a P-3 other than the Lockheed Orion. As far as I know the USAAC Curtiss P-3 never found its way on board, nor would that been its designation in the Navy system of old. Even ignoring the inappropriateness of the "-", looks like none of the P3(whatever) planes from the US Navy did either. Am I missing some other than American type? Or are you by chance thing of the P-2 Neptune which was a twin and did operate in a limited sense from flattops?
|
|
#8
November 18th 03, 04:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"John Keeney" wrote...
Or are you by chance thing of the P-2 Neptune which was a twin and did operate in a limited sense from flattops? No counter-rotating props there, either...
|
|
#9
November 18th 03, 07:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"John R Weiss" wrote:
"John Keeney" wrote... Or are you by chance thing of the P-2 Neptune which was a twin and did operate in a limited sense from flattops? No counter-rotating props there, either... Plus there's very few twin P-2's too, most have are four engines. -- -Gord.
|
|
#10
November 19th 03, 07:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"John Keeney" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "John R Weiss" wrote in message news:bSbub.175559$ao4.582418@attbi_s51... "Seraphim" wrote... "Tarver Engineering" wrote: What, like a P-3? Not single-engine, not a twin, no counter-rotating props, and never operated from a carrier... Never? LOL I assume you have some sort of evidence that a 140,000lb airplane that needs 4,000+ft of runway was somehow able to operate off of a carrier, right? Lack of evidence never stopped Tarver from posting drivel... Weiss once again misses a subtle reference and craps himself. Well, you obviously are thinking of a P-3 other than the Lockheed Orion. No, I was teasing Gord.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| B-29s & P-51s Strike Japan plus "Carrier Franklin" at Zeno's Drive-In | zeno | Home Built | 1 | October 4th 04 11:19 PM |
| B-29s & P-51s Strike Japan plus "Carrier Franklin" at Zeno's Drive-In | zeno | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | October 4th 04 05:32 PM |
| Can the F-14 carry six AIM-54s and land on carrier? | Matthew G. Saroff | Military Aviation | 1 | October 29th 03 08:14 PM |
| C-130 Hercules on a carrier - possible ?? | Jan Gelbrich | Military Aviation | 10 | September 21st 03 04:47 PM |
| launching V-1s from an aircraft carrier | Gordon | Military Aviation | 34 | July 29th 03 11:14 PM |
Hybrid Mode
