![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Denny wrote:
Dudley, I am an ugly american that thinks the so called Royal Family is a bunch rich hawgs feeding at the public trough over there... We put them out of this country and I would put them off the dole in England in a heartbeat had I the discretion... For what it's worth, maintaining the entire extended royal family costs 61p per British taxpayer per year. That's about $1.20 US. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some Other Guy wrote:
Denny wrote: Dudley, I am an ugly american that thinks the so called Royal Family is a bunch rich hawgs feeding at the public trough over there... We put them out of this country and I would put them off the dole in England in a heartbeat had I the discretion... For what it's worth, maintaining the entire extended royal family costs 61p per British taxpayer per year. That's about $1.20 US. The last time I looked, that was their perogitive. If they don't feel like supporting a manarchy any longer then they can just have a revolution like we did. In the meanshile, it's their country and they can do as they please. The whole world doesn't have to be just like us, do they? -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some Other Guy wrote:
Denny wrote: Dudley, I am an ugly american that thinks the so called Royal Family is a bunch rich hawgs feeding at the public trough over there... We put them out of this country and I would put them off the dole in England in a heartbeat had I the discretion... For what it's worth, maintaining the entire extended royal family costs 61p per British taxpayer per year. That's about $1.20 US. And for that they British get??? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Whiting wrote:
Some Other Guy wrote: Denny wrote: Dudley, I am an ugly american that thinks the so called Royal Family is a bunch rich hawgs feeding at the public trough over there... We put them out of this country and I would put them off the dole in England in a heartbeat had I the discretion... For what it's worth, maintaining the entire extended royal family costs 61p per British taxpayer per year. That's about $1.20 US. And for that they British get??? The same thing Americans get out of preserving Gettysburg; history. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Denny" wrote in message ... I would put them off the dole in England in a heartbeat had I the discretion... Yes, but that is for the Brits to decide, and they seem to rather like their royal family; so who the hell are we to say they shouldn't have one? For my part, I would LOVE to score a 13-week paid flying vacation with the RAF. Vaughn |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And for that they British get???
Really cool ceremonial weddings... -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dudley Henriques writes:
I for one will share my sky with a man of Prince William's obvious character. So if someone has "character," he doesn't need flying ability or training to get a pilot's license? It's bad enough when people depend too much on credentials; it's even worse when the credentials have absolutely nothing to do with the activity at hand. Be a royal, get a license--no competence or training required. Your sycophants will still share the skies with you, no matter how dangerous you are. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Dudley Henriques writes: I for one will share my sky with a man of Prince William's obvious character. So if someone has "character," he doesn't need flying ability or training to get a pilot's license? It's bad enough when people depend too much on credentials; it's even worse when the credentials have absolutely nothing to do with the activity at hand. Be a royal, get a license--no competence or training required. Your sycophants will still share the skies with you, no matter how dangerous you are. Your comment I believe is in need of some correction if I may :-) Prince William has no solo flying privileges he hasn't earned, and any flying he might do now or in the future I'm quite certain will be conducted totally within the confines of his level of demonstrated competence. Prince William's "character" as you put it, although at a very high level, will in no way open doors for him to fly anything, or in fact do anything, in an aircraft he hasn't been authorized by competent RAF authority to fly. The RAF has no interest whatsoever in losing either Prince William or one of their aircraft and are quite competent to keep each in one piece. -- Dudley Henriques |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Prince William has no solo flying privileges he hasn't earned, and any
flying he might do now or in the future I'm quite certain will be conducted totally within the confines of his level of demonstrated competence. Prince William's "character" as you put it, although at a very high level, will in no way open doors for him to fly anything, or in fact do anything, in an aircraft he hasn't been authorized by competent RAF authority to fly. The RAF has no interest whatsoever in losing either Prince William or one of their aircraft and are quite competent to keep each in one piece. Oh no, no, no. No one would ever allow them to do anything stupid just because of who they are, now would they? Er, well ... see http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m..._/ai_n13995635 E |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
me wrote:
Prince William has no solo flying privileges he hasn't earned, and any flying he might do now or in the future I'm quite certain will be conducted totally within the confines of his level of demonstrated competence. Prince William's "character" as you put it, although at a very high level, will in no way open doors for him to fly anything, or in fact do anything, in an aircraft he hasn't been authorized by competent RAF authority to fly. The RAF has no interest whatsoever in losing either Prince William or one of their aircraft and are quite competent to keep each in one piece. Oh no, no, no. No one would ever allow them to do anything stupid just because of who they are, now would they? Er, well ... see http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m..._/ai_n13995635 E This accident was a dual flight, not solo, and as such is outside the confines of our discussion. It also was not authorized. The argument to make this incident unique to the Prince of Wales is a stretch, as this type of thing has happened many many times before to plain ordinary people. The instructor involved in the incident was faulted which from what I am reading, was duly justified. This type of accident is not unique at all to the Prince of Wales and has occurred unfortunately since time immemorial both involving flight instructors AND pilots generally, when newbies are allowed to fly the airplane and allowed so deeply into errors that the PIC of the aircraft can't recover same. The bottom line here is that although the accident was unfortunate, what happened wasn't unique at all as applies to the Prince of Wales. -- Dudley Henriques |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Cessna Wings for the World by William D. Thompson | [email protected] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | March 16th 05 09:42 PM |
Prince propellors | Mike Borgelt | Home Built | 6 | December 12th 03 06:41 AM |
Prince propeller | Philippe Vessaire | Home Built | 3 | October 27th 03 08:04 PM |