![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.aviation.student tman inv@lid wrote:
Here's why I wonder about that. Let's suppose 65 KAS before and after a 180 turn from a 10 KT headwind. OK, before the turn, your groundspeed is 55KTS and after the turn your groundspeed is 75KTS. Your intertial frame of reference is tied to the g/speed, not the a/speed. So -- the kinetic energy of the aircraft and contents is about 33% higher (75/55)^2. That energy is only going to come from one place with no power -- trading in altitude (potential energy) for kinetic energy. This simply does not make any sense. Kinetic energy, like velocity, is a relative quantity. You cannot look at an object and say, "it has X joules of KE". You can only talk about KE relative to some frame of reference. Just like velocity. So forget about KE. It's in the same boat as velocity, so look at velocity. You make a turn and suddenly you gain a bunch of groundspeed. Where does the extra speed come from? It comes because you're maneuvering relative to a medium, the air, which is itself moving. Your KE relative to that medium is exactly the same as it was, so no energy has to come from anywhere. -- Michael Ash Rogue Amoeba Software |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
lancair crash scapoose, OR | gatt | Piloting | 10 | October 26th 06 03:34 PM |
Lancair IV | Dico Reyers | Owning | 6 | October 19th 04 11:47 PM |
Lancair 320 ram air? | ROBIN FLY | Home Built | 17 | January 7th 04 11:54 PM |
Lancair 320/360 kit wanted!!! | Erik W | Owning | 0 | October 3rd 03 10:17 PM |
Lancair IVP | Peter Gottlieb | Home Built | 2 | August 22nd 03 03:51 AM |