![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sisu1a wrote in
: On Apr 27, 3:45 pm, Larry Dighera wrote: On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:03:33 -0700 (PDT), WingFlaps wrote in : On Apr 28, 9:32 am, Larry Dighera wrote: On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:34:55 -0700 (PDT), WingFlaps wrote in 68afa9fb-b4d2-4620-91e6-f0a85a75d... @x19g2000prg.googlegroups.com : A radar reflector like they use on weather balloon ought be sufficient. It is just a piece of foil with a large cross section. That's a constructive suggestion. How large must such a radar reflector be? It's a retroreflector, I have one in the form of a tube about 3 inches in diameter and 2 feet long. The corner cubes are inside that. I have no idea how effective it is compared to a classic reflector which occupies a cube about 1 foot across and retroreflects the radar equally in all directions. ... Interesting. Thanks for the information. How do you think it might affect a sailplane's L/D? Well, if the sailplane skin is transparent to radar a big reflector could be mounted inside, they don't weigh much. On the other hand a cylinder type reflector could be made quite aerodynamic and even incorporated into (say) the wing tips? Cheers That sounds like a very simple, inexpensive and effective solution to the issue. Best of all, the pilot can't turn it off. :-) Unfortunately too simple. The problem is NOT ATC's equipment having trouble painting a glider. The problem is the threshold of sensitivity on their radars is set far too high to display us since they intentionally filter out things as slow as a glider, particularly if it's thermalling. We are simply filtered out as clutter (according to the rep Reno sent to address PASCO last winter). That said, I'm sure we don't all read the same on radar, but gliders are not the stealth aircraft they are being made out to be. I believe cockpit alone has a rather large signature, unless of course you paid the extra $1,000,000 for the one molecule thick layer of electrically deposited gold on your canopy. There's more to a stealth aircraft then it being made of fiberglass, or even carbon. You fly Sisu? Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Feds Want to Equipe Gliders With Transponders and Radios | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 155 | May 10th 08 02:45 PM |
Feds Want to Equipe Gliders With Transponders and Radios | Larry Dighera | Soaring | 12 | May 1st 08 03:42 PM |
Gliders, transponders, and MOAs | Greg Arnold | Soaring | 2 | May 26th 06 05:13 PM |
Transponders and Radios - USA | Ray Lovinggood | Soaring | 1 | February 27th 04 06:10 PM |
Transponders, Radios and other avionics procurement questions | Corky Scott | Home Built | 5 | July 2nd 03 11:27 PM |