![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Question: Can a conventional powered airplane take off from a conveyor belt which is moving at the same speed but in an opposite direction? I was surprised at people's range and passion of answers when I asked this of my glider club. * People were absolutely sure it wouldn't work or it would work. *I guess that goes to show that performing this as a thought experiment is not easy even for pilots. Please make your own guess before you watch these Youtube videos (in order) for the final answer. http://youtube.com/watch?v=KSBFQOfas60* Start http://youtube.com/watch?v=S377HwOthjo http://youtube.com/watch?v=0ul_5DtMLhc Finish What I am really surprise about is that the "test" pilot in this video of the airplane had the wrong answer before his attempt and was very surprised afterwards. *Well, maybe not surprised, he was a light sport pilot after all. *Personally, I knew the correct answer from the get- go. *Hint: The answer is in the wheels. - John Relativity!! The misunderstanding probably derives from the fact that the question is inadequate in not specifying whether the plane is to be regarded as moving as the same speed (but opposite direction) as the conveyor relative to the belt or relative to the ground/nil wind airmass. The motor vehicles in the videos are moving oppositely at the same speed relative to the belt - i.e. stationary relative to the ground/ airmass. The propeller aeroplane is moving oppositely relative to the ground/airmass and so obviously should have no great difficulty in taking off - it is, however, at take off, moving at about twice the speed relative to the belt as the belt is relative to the ground. The fact that the freewheel/propeller derived thrust characteristics of an aeroplane allow it to achieve take does not negate the fact that at a lower power setting it could be set up such that it remained stationary relative to the ground (like the cars) in which case it would not take off - and this is what many people would probably assume was meant by the question. The question not logically valid as it implies two possible but different hypotheses. John Galloway |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MythBusters airplane on a conveyor belt | Peter Clark | Piloting | 56 | February 3rd 08 10:05 PM |
Mythbusters | Rich S.[_1_] | Home Built | 7 | February 1st 08 12:03 PM |
Two conveyor belt scenarios | [email protected] | Piloting | 24 | September 27th 06 05:32 AM |
MythBusters | Hilton | Piloting | 7 | February 4th 04 03:30 AM |