![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
The classic turkey: The Fisher XP-75 Eagle -- supposed to become an escort fighter, built from parts of several production aircraft. One of the first real proofs that you can make all sorts of things fly with a big enough engine. Mc Donnell F3H-1 Demon -- like the "gutless Cutlass," underpowered, designed to be supersonic. ....and the corresponding "with a poor engine, any plane can be a piece of crap." Martin P5M Seamaster ("Seamonster") jet Medium bomber seaplane. P6M. The P5M was the Marlin. (Although the P6M was based off of the P5M). And let's not forget the corresponding fighter, the cool-looking but problematic Sea Dart - I would have loved to see one of these in the air. Convair XFY-1 VTOL fighter, along with the Lockheed XFV-1 -- both tailsitters. Pilots found the transition from flight to tail-first vertical landing too hard to do. Oddly enough, the tailsitter designs are coming back... without the pilots. Some of the more promising UAVs look much like the pogo planes, since the computers running them have much less trouble dealing with that transition than people do. For some reason, many pilots don't like trying to land an aircraft while lying on their backs. There are so many wonderful example of planes that sucked... The XA2D Skyshark, which showed that early turboprops often weren't ready for prime time, and reminded us that contrarotating props had their own issues. Then there's the slow but loud XF-84H, with a turboprop engine and a big fat prop up front. Which shows that you can screw up anything if you try hard enough. -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sukhoi's SU-2. However, its engine (actuallu, its derivatives) proved itself
when mached to LaGG-3 airframe, resultig in La-5/7/9 -- Nele NULLA ROSA SINE SPINA Chad Irby wrote in message ... In article The classic turkey: The Fisher XP-75 Eagle -- supposed to become an escort fighter, built from parts of several production aircraft. One of the first real proofs that you can make all sorts of things fly with a big enough engine. Mc Donnell F3H-1 Demon -- like the "gutless Cutlass," underpowered, designed to be supersonic. ...and the corresponding "with a poor engine, any plane can be a piece of crap." Martin P5M Seamaster ("Seamonster") jet Medium bomber seaplane. P6M. The P5M was the Marlin. (Although the P6M was based off of the P5M). And let's not forget the corresponding fighter, the cool-looking but problematic Sea Dart - I would have loved to see one of these in the air. Convair XFY-1 VTOL fighter, along with the Lockheed XFV-1 -- both tailsitters. Pilots found the transition from flight to tail-first vertical landing too hard to do. Oddly enough, the tailsitter designs are coming back... without the pilots. Some of the more promising UAVs look much like the pogo planes, since the computers running them have much less trouble dealing with that transition than people do. For some reason, many pilots don't like trying to land an aircraft while lying on their backs. There are so many wonderful example of planes that sucked... The XA2D Skyshark, which showed that early turboprops often weren't ready for prime time, and reminded us that contrarotating props had their own issues. Then there's the slow but loud XF-84H, with a turboprop engine and a big fat prop up front. Which shows that you can screw up anything if you try hard enough. -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 40 | October 3rd 08 03:13 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 1st 04 02:31 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | September 2nd 04 05:15 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | April 5th 04 03:04 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |