A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Air Carriers and Biz-jets Target GA Recreational Fliers



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 23rd 08, 12:27 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Andrew Sarangan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 382
Default Air Carriers and Biz-jets Target GA Recreational Fliers

On May 22, 6:00 pm, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:
"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message

...



No argument here. ATC was created primarily to increase the safety of
airline travel, after some spectacular mid-airs in the early years.


Such as? I can think of only one rather non-spectacular mid-air collision
of airliners prior to the creation of ATC.


Perhaps I should have said "ATC was expanded primarily to increase the
safety of airline travel". Notable accidents that created public
outcry to empower ATC we
DC7 and Constellation in 1956 over Grand Canyon
DC8 and Constellation in 1960 over New York

I don't think it is a coincidence that every class B or C airspace is
located at airports that primarily serve airline traffic. Class D
tower is the highest I've seen at GA airports, and even there it
appears to be mostly due to historic reasons (ie it used to be a
military field or used to have airline traffic some time in the past).
Some airports operate their class D tower only when scheduled airlines
are expected to arrive and depart.


  #2  
Old May 23rd 08, 03:12 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 721
Default Air Carriers and Biz-jets Target GA Recreational Fliers

"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message

No argument here. ATC was created primarily to increase the safety
of airline travel, after some spectacular mid-airs in the early
years.


Such as? I can think of only one rather non-spectacular mid-air
collision of airliners prior to the creation of ATC.


Perhaps I should have said "ATC was expanded primarily to increase the
safety of airline travel". Notable accidents that created public
outcry to empower ATC we
DC7 and Constellation in 1956 over Grand Canyon
DC8 and Constellation in 1960 over New York


ATC was created primarily to increase the safety of airline travel, but it
was created some twenty years before the Grand Canyon midair.



I don't think it is a coincidence that every class B or C airspace is
located at airports that primarily serve airline traffic.


There is Class C airspace at fields that serve exclusively military traffic.


  #3  
Old May 23rd 08, 05:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
F. Baum
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 244
Default Air Carriers and Biz-jets Target GA Recreational Fliers

On May 22, 5:27*pm, Andrew Sarangan wrote:

Class D
tower is the highest I've seen at GA airports, and even there it
appears to be mostly due to historic reasons (ie it used to be a
military field or used to have airline traffic some time in the past).
Some airports operate their class D tower only when scheduled airlines
are expected to arrive and depart.


The need for a tower is based on the number or volume of A/C
movements. Also, keep in mind that it takes special authorization for
a 121 carrier to operate IFR in uncontroller airspace.

  #4  
Old May 23rd 08, 10:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Andrew Sarangan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 382
Default Air Carriers and Biz-jets Target GA Recreational Fliers

On May 23, 12:32 pm, "F. Baum" wrote:
On May 22, 5:27 pm, Andrew Sarangan wrote:



Class D
tower is the highest I've seen at GA airports, and even there it
appears to be mostly due to historic reasons (ie it used to be a
military field or used to have airline traffic some time in the past).
Some airports operate their class D tower only when scheduled airlines
are expected to arrive and depart.


The need for a tower is based on the number or volume of A/C
movements. Also, keep in mind that it takes special authorization for
a 121 carrier to operate IFR in uncontroller airspace.


I would be interested to know how many ATC towers have been built for
reasons other than serving 121 carriers or military. Oshkosh is one
example, but are there more?


  #5  
Old May 23rd 08, 11:28 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 721
Default Air Carriers and Biz-jets Target GA Recreational Fliers

Andrew Sarangan wrote:

I would be interested to know how many ATC towers have been built for
reasons other than serving 121 carriers or military. Oshkosh is one
example, but are there more?


Oshkosh is NOT one of them. Oshkosh tower was established about eight years
before the EAA moved it's convention from Rockford, North Central Airlines
was providing scheduled service.


  #6  
Old May 27th 08, 02:54 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jay Honeck[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 943
Default Air Carriers and Biz-jets Target GA Recreational Fliers

Oshkosh is NOT one of them. Oshkosh tower was established about eight
years before the EAA moved it's convention from Rockford, North Central
Airlines was providing scheduled service.


True, but it would certainly have been decommissioned by now, were it not
for Airventure.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

  #7  
Old May 27th 08, 02:56 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,969
Default Air Carriers and Biz-jets Target GA Recreational Fliers

"Jay Honeck" wrote in
news:iRJ_j.127265$TT4.587@attbi_s22:

Oshkosh is NOT one of them. Oshkosh tower was established about
eight years before the EAA moved it's convention from Rockford, North
Central Airlines was providing scheduled service.


True, but it would certainly have been decommissioned by now, were it
not for Airventure.


Idiot


Bertie
  #8  
Old May 23rd 08, 11:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
F. Baum
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 244
Default Air Carriers and Biz-jets Target GA Recreational Fliers

On May 23, 3:36*pm, Andrew Sarangan wrote:

I would be interested to know how many ATC towers have been built for
reasons other than serving 121 carriers or military. *Oshkosh is one
example, but are there more?



There is a whole bunch of them out west at busy GA airports.
  #9  
Old June 15th 08, 04:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 721
Default Air Carriers and Biz-jets Target GA Recreational Fliers

F. Baum wrote:

There is a whole bunch of them out west at busy GA airports.


How many is a whole bunch?


  #10  
Old May 24th 08, 04:27 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Orval Fairbairn[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 530
Default Air Carriers and Biz-jets Target GA Recreational Fliers

In article
,
Andrew Sarangan wrote:

On May 23, 12:32 pm, "F. Baum" wrote:
On May 22, 5:27 pm, Andrew Sarangan wrote:



Class D
tower is the highest I've seen at GA airports, and even there it
appears to be mostly due to historic reasons (ie it used to be a
military field or used to have airline traffic some time in the past).
Some airports operate their class D tower only when scheduled airlines
are expected to arrive and depart.


The need for a tower is based on the number or volume of A/C
movements. Also, keep in mind that it takes special authorization for
a 121 carrier to operate IFR in uncontroller airspace.


I would be interested to know how many ATC towers have been built for
reasons other than serving 121 carriers or military. Oshkosh is one
example, but are there more?


New Smyrna Beach (EVB), Ormond Beach (ORM) to serve Embry-Riddle
University. Also talk abour one at DeLand (DED), too.

--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FA: One-Day-Left: 3 Books - JETS JETS and JETS - AIRPORT - 30 Seconds Over Tokyo Alan Aviation Marketplace 0 August 14th 05 01:11 PM
Remains of fliers returned to U.S. Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 August 19th 04 11:32 PM
Any fliers? Garamondextended Military Aviation 200 June 8th 04 08:45 PM
For Fliers Only ArtKramr Military Aviation 37 December 4th 03 09:33 PM
'They want to ban recreational flying...' Thomas J. Paladino Jr. Piloting 28 July 22nd 03 07:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.