![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 22, 7:19*pm, Sliker wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2008 15:02:03 -0700 (PDT), BobR wrote: I looked at the Velocity and the Cozy a long time ago before I started on my project. *I loved the look of the planes but after getting an opportunity to flying in a Velocity once, I am glad I decided on a more traditional tractor design. *Nothing concrete to say against the canards other than my personal preference. *I just didn't like the ground handling and the transition to and from flight mode of the canards. True, most of the flight reports I read about the canards leave me not so excited about the way they fly and handle. Nice flying qualities sometimes seem to get forgotten. Several pilots that have flown the Lancairs (2 seat versions) say they have a dead feel and not much fun to fly. I've been building a Glasair for many years, and just a couple of years ago I finally got to fly one. The ailerons were nice, but the elevator felt kind of dead. Makes me want to keep the plane I have and sell it when it's finished. *No one will talk about that subject much, probably out of fear of making their planes hard to sell. But it's not such *a great system to spend years on end building a plane, only to find out it flies bad. I have flown two versions of the Kis Cruiser which I am building and found it to be a very predictable but not the most exciting plane to fly. On the other hand, I wasn't really looking for an exciting plane so much as a good cross country plane. Even at that, the performance figures are good and it is not so large that it flys like a big boat either. With homebuilts though, you may find measurable differences in flying qualities between copies of the same aircraft. An example can be found with different builders of the KIS. Some have determined that they wanted more elevator control and added a couple of inches to the trailing edge of their elevators. I agree with you that spending years building only to find out the plane you built is not the plane you expected is a very bad deal. I know at least one RV-6 builder who spent years building a very beautiful airplane. He put on about a dozen hours of the initial flight testing and immediately put the plane up for sale. The aircraft was everthing it was supposed to be but it scared the s__t out of him and he went back to his Cub. Seemed that what he really enjoyed flying was low and slow. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Questions about homebuilding, and the Sportman 2+2 in particular | Paul Tomblin | Home Built | 7 | April 29th 06 06:57 PM |
New Aircraft Homebuilding Forum | VP2Flyer | Owning | 0 | January 11th 05 04:22 AM |
New Aircraft Homebuilding Forum | VP2Flyer | Home Built | 0 | January 11th 05 03:57 AM |
Homebuilding Killed John Denver | never_moore352 | Home Built | 36 | September 4th 04 03:38 AM |
Problems with homebuilding: bad manual | MINIWI | General Aviation | 3 | January 27th 04 10:53 PM |