Kennedy gets his own TFR

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in
m:

More_Flaps wrote:
On May 24, 9:57 pm, "Steve Foley" wrote:

He gets the cape to himself for the holiday weekend.

Is he really that important?


No.




Can you be sure?

Bertie

I do not like the man, but would say his privacy should be respected.
If good taste won't keep people away, this minor inconvenience to
pilots is fine. Although, given the tastelessness of many who would
get close, the zone should be defined as anything within range of say
a 50 caliber round.


shoOn May 24, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote innews:Xv6dndHFYIQAp6XVnZ2dnUVZ_sHinZ2d@earthlink. com:

More_Flaps wrote:
On May 24, 9:57 pm, "Steve Foley" wrote:

He gets the cape to himself for the holiday weekend.

Is he really that important?

No.

Can you be sure?

Bertie

shoOn May 24, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

Can you be sure?

Bertie


Absolutely.

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in
m:

shoOn May 24, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

Can you be sure?

Bertie


Absolutely.




How#'s that? Can you be absolutely sure beyond any shadow of doubt that he
isn't the second coming?


Bertie

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...

How#'s that? Can you be absolutely sure beyond any shadow of doubt that he
isn't the second coming?


Bertie

What a dumb ass.

"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in
:


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...

How#'s that? Can you be absolutely sure beyond any shadow of doubt
that he isn't the second coming?


Bertie

What a dumb ass.



You got proof he ain't, fjukktard?

You come from jesusland, you wil believe anything!





Bertie

Tina wrote:
I do not like the man, but would say his privacy should be respected.
If good taste won't keep people away, this minor inconvenience to
pilots is fine. Although, given the tastelessness of many who would
get close, the zone should be defined as anything within range of say
a 50 caliber round.


shoOn May 24, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote innews:Xv6dndHFYIQAp6XVnZ2dnUVZ_sHinZ2d@earthlink. com:

More_Flaps wrote:
On May 24, 9:57 pm, "Steve Foley" wrote:
He gets the cape to himself for the holiday weekend.
Is he really that important?
No.
Can you be sure?

Bertie

I agree. Like him or not, (and I can't stand the guy believe me ) his
"position" in the government warrants protection. It's a sad testimony
to aviation if some of those who fly can't make this simple distinction.
We live in difficult times. When and if we reach the point where both
sides of a political equation start wishing each other harm and deride a
Senator's (ANY Senator's) right to personal protection, we have reached
a point fraught with danger for the country.

--
Dudley Henriques

On May 25, 5:49*am, Dudley Henriques wrote:
Tina wrote:
I do not like the man, but would say his privacy should be respected.
If good taste won't keep people away, this minor inconvenience to
pilots is fine. Although, given the tastelessness of many who would
get close, the zone should be defined as anything within range of say
a 50 caliber round.

*shoOn May 24, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote innews:Xv6dndHFYIQAp6XVnZ2dnUVZ_sHinZ2d@earthlink. com:

More_Flaps wrote:
On May 24, 9:57 pm, "Steve Foley" wrote:
He gets the cape to himself for the holiday weekend.
Is he really that important?
No.
Can you be sure?

Bertie

I agree. Like him or not, (and I can't stand the guy believe me ) his
"position" in the government warrants protection. It's a sad testimony
to aviation if some of those who fly can't make this simple distinction.
We live in difficult times. When and if we reach the point where both
sides of a political equation start wishing each other harm and deride a
Senator's (ANY Senator's) right to personal protection, we have reached
a point fraught with danger for the country.


What I don't see is why some people think he merits airspace
restictions. Is it at likely that a threat to him will be made from
the air? Is he going to have a coastguard escort too? What about other
senators then? To be honest, I think its self promoting
grandstanding..

Cheers

You are assuming it is a TSR he requested. It's possible the FAA,
knowing how stupid some people are, did it on their own. If he wanted
printer's ink he would not have requested the restriction.

More_Flaps wrote:
On May 25, 5:49 am, Dudley Henriques wrote:
Tina wrote:
I do not like the man, but would say his privacy should be respected.
If good taste won't keep people away, this minor inconvenience to
pilots is fine. Although, given the tastelessness of many who would
get close, the zone should be defined as anything within range of say
a 50 caliber round.
shoOn May 24, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote innews:Xv6dndHFYIQAp6XVnZ2dnUVZ_sHinZ2d@earthlink. com:
More_Flaps wrote:
On May 24, 9:57 pm, "Steve Foley" wrote:
He gets the cape to himself for the holiday weekend.
Is he really that important?
No.
Can you be sure?
Bertie
I agree. Like him or not, (and I can't stand the guy believe me ) his
"position" in the government warrants protection. It's a sad testimony
to aviation if some of those who fly can't make this simple distinction.
We live in difficult times. When and if we reach the point where both
sides of a political equation start wishing each other harm and deride a
Senator's (ANY Senator's) right to personal protection, we have reached
a point fraught with danger for the country.


What I don't see is why some people think he merits airspace
restictions. Is it at likely that a threat to him will be made from
the air? Is he going to have a coastguard escort too? What about other
senators then? To be honest, I think its self promoting
grandstanding..

Cheers

Difference of opinion is what makes Usenet interesting isn't it :-) ?

--
Dudley Henriques