A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sky High Av gas **** you off?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 2nd 08, 09:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gig 601Xl Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 683
Default Sky High Av gas **** you off?

Larry Dighera wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 14:50:55 -0400, "Birdog" wrote in
:

Being stupid is a good alternative if you don't want to bother to actually
learn the facts. As is being an environmentalist.


Catering to environmentalists may be more financially rewarding than
it is political. I look for photo voltaics to be the next dot-com
investment vogue.



It is only financially rewarding because it was made politically correct
to be an environmentalist.

"next dot-com investment vogue" you may be right but a lot of folks lost
a lot of money when that bubble burst.
  #2  
Old June 2nd 08, 09:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default Sky High Av gas **** you off?

On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:09:25 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder
wrote in
:

Larry Dighera wrote:

Catering to environmentalists may be more financially rewarding than
it is political. I look for photo voltaics to be the next dot-com
investment vogue.



It is only financially rewarding because it was made politically correct
to be an environmentalist.


Perhaps. But with the current record market prices for crude oil, you
can bet photo voltaics will become a lot more popular and attractive
to the general public as solar electricity becomes more competitive
with coal/natural gas/oil. While that won't directly relieve the
financial burden on pilots, in the long run it could reduce our
nation's dependency on petroleum based energy. That's got to be a
good thing for US independence from the whims of foreign nations as
well as being more environmentally friendly.


"next dot-com investment vogue" you may be right but a lot of folks lost
a lot of money when that bubble burst.


Doesn't that usually occur at the end of most of these popular
investment cycles?

Personally, I don't see the demand for energy slacking any time soon,
so I foresee a much longer investment cycle in the solar and wind
power marketplace.
  #3  
Old June 3rd 08, 12:25 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default Sky High Av gas **** you off?

Larry Dighera wrote:

Perhaps. But with the current record market prices for crude oil, you
can bet photo voltaics will become a lot more popular and attractive
to the general public as solar electricity becomes more competitive
with coal/natural gas/oil. While that won't directly relieve the
financial burden on pilots, in the long run it could reduce our
nation's dependency on petroleum based energy. That's got to be a
good thing for US independence from the whims of foreign nations as
well as being more environmentally friendly.


Non sequitur.

Electricity doesn't compete with oil and one has nothing to do with
the other in the existing, real world.

Coal is not oil and US coal comes from the US.

Natural gas is not oil and US natural gas comes from the US and Canada.

Personally, I don't see the demand for energy slacking any time soon,
so I foresee a much longer investment cycle in the solar and wind
power marketplace.


Until the subsidies run out like last time.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #4  
Old June 3rd 08, 12:49 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steve Foley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 563
Default Sky High Av gas **** you off?

wrote in message
...
Larry Dighera wrote:


Electricity doesn't compete with oil and one has nothing to do with
the other in the existing, real world.

Coal is not oil and US coal comes from the US.

Natural gas is not oil and US natural gas comes from the US and Canada.


I can use all of the above to heat my house. In the last 12 months, I spent
$2200 on natural gas. My sister-in-law heats with electricity.

For this purpose, they're interchangable.

I forget - Kalifornia isn't the real world.


  #5  
Old June 3rd 08, 02:45 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default Sky High Av gas **** you off?

Steve Foley wrote:
wrote in message
...
Larry Dighera wrote:


Electricity doesn't compete with oil and one has nothing to do with
the other in the existing, real world.

Coal is not oil and US coal comes from the US.

Natural gas is not oil and US natural gas comes from the US and Canada.


I can use all of the above to heat my house. In the last 12 months, I spent
$2200 on natural gas. My sister-in-law heats with electricity.


For this purpose, they're interchangable.


Yeah, so what?

Most building heat on the West side of the US is natural gas and has
been for about a half century.

You will be hard pressed to find any new construction (or within the
past couple of decades) that uses anything other than gas for building
heat in an area with a gas distribution system.

Using electricity for heat is a dumb idea unless you are getting
your power from the TVA for essentially nothing.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #6  
Old June 2nd 08, 10:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
gatt[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 156
Default Sky High Av gas **** you off?

Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:

It is only financially rewarding because it was made politically correct
to be an environmentalist.


Depends on where you live and the specific issues. There are more types
and degrees of environmentalists out here as there are states in the
union.

-c
  #7  
Old June 3rd 08, 02:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gig 601Xl Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 683
Default Sky High Av gas **** you off?

gatt wrote:
Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:

It is only financially rewarding because it was made politically
correct to be an environmentalist.


Depends on where you live and the specific issues. There are more types
and degrees of environmentalists out here as there are states in the union.

-c


I have to disagree with you here. Pretty much everywhere in the US,
including the oil producing and processing states it is politically
correct to be an environmentalist right now.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fix the high cost [Was:] High Cost of Sportplanes Evan Carew Home Built 40 October 8th 05 04:05 AM
High Oil Pressure (was: Low oil pressure, high oil temp?) Thomas Ploch Owning 4 October 5th 04 04:34 AM
1972 piss test . . . so where was dubya ?? Transition Zone Military Aviation 8 September 23rd 04 04:48 AM
High And Low SelwayKid Piloting 5 July 18th 04 04:09 AM
IVO pireps wanted.. high performance/high speed... Dave S Home Built 8 June 2nd 04 04:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.