![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() This got me thinking about something. I recall when I was a teenager I got a hold of my father's ratchet set and started using it on various bolts around the house. I quickly learned why torque wrenches were invented as I sheared the heads off of many of them. Since then I've been respectful of how much force you can exert with a lever, even one only a foot long. So I occurs to me that there may be a downside to repetitive PCCs if they are not done properly. If the person applying the force on the stick (a lever) applied a great amount of force and the individual opposing that force on the control surface (also a lever) did likewise it might be possible to repetitively stress and weaken the bellcrank and bolt since that's where the forces would converge in opposite directions. I'm not an engineer, but it seems to me that some care must be taken here so that the forces do not exceed those that the system would be designed for, i.e., those that would be encountered in flight. The forces required to assure a stable connection are far less than what might be accidentally applied by individuals who are not aware of how to do this properly. There was another Grob SB this summer about the shearing of the removable rear control stick just below the attachement point. The picture in the SB looked to me more like metal fatigue rather than corrosion. Whether this is from PCCs or fighting students is not clear, but the force mechanisms might be the same. " wrote in message ... Our club's Twin III had a major problem that was found in a Positive Control Check, the bolt holding the belcranks for the airbrakes and the elevator (located behind the rear seat in the control hookup area) had sheared. Grob will probably be doing an AD for instpection soon, our plane is at Grob right now being inspected (they are only a 20 minute drive from the club!). Please inspect your Twin III before you fly in again. And for those of you who don't feel the need to do a PCC .... This wouldn't have shown up with a visual inspection nor probably on a "hands on" inspection. Bob |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stephanie and Ed" wrote:
Ed or Stephanie ;` The initial thoughts from our "Guru's" is that this problem came about as a result of "heavy handed" PCC checks. Maybe we need someone to develope an adjustable strain guage that can be used for PCC's. Set the guage to the proper load and test away! Bob |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looking for hand controls (rudder) for Grob Twin II | YFCpilots | Soaring | 3 | April 7th 08 01:08 AM |
ID Twin w/ twin vert stabs--RPV? Unk_Twin.jpg (01/01) | No Name | Aviation Photos | 5 | October 12th 07 05:55 AM |
Grob Twin Astir Tailshaking | Peter | Soaring | 11 | January 14th 07 11:54 PM |
Need Grob 103 Twin II left front rudder pedal | Mike McCarron | Soaring | 1 | May 15th 06 02:16 PM |
Grob Twin Astir 1 Manual / Flughandbuch | Sebastian Schroeter | Soaring | 2 | June 14th 04 11:41 AM |