UNITED AIR LINES TO LAY OFF 950 PILOTS

writes:

Pretty well, which is why it is a goal for most companies, not just
airlines.

Fewer flights increases utilization of assets? Examples?

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

Pretty well, which is why it is a goal for most companies, not just
airlines.

Fewer flights increases utilization of assets? Examples?

I take back everything I ever said about you being intelligent but
a social incompetent.

You are dumb and socially incompetent.

Here's an example so simple even you should be able to understand it:

Instead of making 2 flights at 50% capacity, you make 1 at 100%.

Of course it would have probably helped if you knew what "utilization
of assets" means.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

writes:

Here's an example so simple even you should be able to understand it:

Instead of making 2 flights at 50% capacity, you make 1 at 100%.

When did capacity enter the picture?

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

Here's an example so simple even you should be able to understand it:

Instead of making 2 flights at 50% capacity, you make 1 at 100%.

When did capacity enter the picture?

Like I said, it would help if you knew what "utilization of assets" means.

Maybe you could beg up a book on basic business on Amazon.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

writes:

Like I said, it would help if you knew what "utilization of assets" means.

Does it include sales of mineral water?

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

Like I said, it would help if you knew what "utilization of assets" means.

Does it include sales of mineral water?

If you have a mineral water well, pumps, and a bottling plant.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

writes:

Here's an example so simple even you should be able to understand it:

Instead of making 2 flights at 50% capacity, you make 1 at 100%.

When did capacity enter the picture?

Anthony, you get dumber with every post you make.

Mxsmanic wrote:

writes:


Here's an example so simple even you should be able to understand it:

Instead of making 2 flights at 50% capacity, you make 1 at 100%.


When did capacity enter the picture?

In a business where allocation of assets and capacity utilization are
fundamental to the success of that business, it should be assumed. In
my experience, only extraordinarly stupid people don't understand such
business fundamentals, and only extremely stupid people would even ask
a question like "when did capacity enter the picture?" when discussing
such matters.

yeedyeegiiss wrote in
:

Mxsmanic wrote:

writes:


Here's an example so simple even you should be able to understand it:

Instead of making 2 flights at 50% capacity, you make 1 at 100%.


When did capacity enter the picture?

In a business where allocation of assets and capacity utilization are
fundamental to the success of that business, it should be assumed. In
my experience, only extraordinarly stupid people don't understand such
business fundamentals, and only extremely stupid people would even ask
a question like "when did capacity enter the picture?" when discussing
such matters.

It will be fun to see how Anthony tries to slither away from this one!

wrote in :

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

Pretty well, which is why it is a goal for most companies, not just
airlines.

Fewer flights increases utilization of assets? Examples?

I take back everything I ever said about you being intelligent but
a social incompetent.

You are dumb and socially incompetent.

Here's an example so simple even you should be able to understand it:

Instead of making 2 flights at 50% capacity, you make 1 at 100%.

Of course it would have probably helped if you knew what "utilization
of assets" means.



Anthony has no idea of what an asset is, as he doesn't have any. Thus, he
has no way of knowing what "utilization of assets" means.