Aircraft Carrier and airspace?

Mxsmanic wrote:
Gig 601Xl Builder writes:

Here's the problem you are looking at from a legal standpoint and
wanting to add a legal tag to it. They aren't. They would be looking at
you as a threat.

CARRIER DESTROYS DEADLY CESSNA IN MILITARY-FAMILY CONFLICT

Babbling, inane nonsense.

And just how many weapons do you think were tracking that Bear the whole
time?

Tracking is routine, shooting is not.

How would you have any clue what goes on in the military from down deep
in your bunker?

You haven't a clue how real military engagements work, or to put it more
concisely, you don't know **** from shinola about the military or
anything else in the real world.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

writes:

How would you have any clue what goes on in the military from down deep
in your bunker?

I know that some fighter pilots with ego and judgement problems try to
terrorize civilian aircraft.

You haven't a clue how real military engagements work ...

This wasn't a military engagement, despite the pilot's fantasies to the
contrary.

In a long history of ignorant remarks, you've reached a new level when
you wrote

On Jul 19, 7:23*am, Mxsmanic wrote:


I know that some fighter pilots with ego and judgement problems try to
terrorize civilian aircraft.


They may play those games on a simulator, but most military pilots so
value the privilege of flying they do their best not to put it at risk
by displaying that kind of judgment. You 'know' nothing!

How does a carrier operate in home waters?
Does it always sail with escort vessels?

On the open water, a carrier task force sails with picket vessels
operating at a standoff distance to intercept potential threats before
they can strike the carrier (in theory).

If you are operating over open water, is it not standard procedure to
monitor 121.5 MHz?

writes:

They may play those games on a simulator, but most military pilots so
value the privilege of flying they do their best not to put it at risk
by displaying that kind of judgment.

Obviously, one military pilot decided to put his privilege at risk. And I
suspect the military didn't bother to revoke that privilege, which is why it
kept its actions (if any) secret. It wouldn't do to publicly announce that
the pilot got off scott-free.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
writes:

They may play those games on a simulator, but most military pilots so
value the privilege of flying they do their best not to put it at risk
by displaying that kind of judgment.

Obviously, one military pilot decided to put his privilege at risk. And I
suspect the military didn't bother to revoke that privilege, which is why
it
kept its actions (if any) secret. It wouldn't do to publicly announce
that
the pilot got off scott-free.


No different than a non-pilot continually trolling a pilots NG.

On Jul 19, 11:00 am, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:
They may play those games on a simulator, but most military pilots so
value the privilege of flying they do their best not to put it at risk
by displaying that kind of judgment.

Obviously, one military pilot decided to put his privilege at risk. And I
suspect the military didn't bother to revoke that privilege, which is why it
kept its actions (if any) secret. It wouldn't do to publicly announce that
the pilot got off scott-free.

You may wish to investigate further before you make those kinds of
statements

wrote in
:

On Jul 19, 11:00 am, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:
They may play those games on a simulator, but most military pilots
so value the privilege of flying they do their best not to put it
at risk by displaying that kind of judgment.

Obviously, one military pilot decided to put his privilege at risk.
And I suspect the military didn't bother to revoke that privilege,
which is why it kept its actions (if any) secret. It wouldn't do to
publicly announce that the pilot got off scott-free.

You may wish to investigate further before you make those kinds of
statements


Then again , he may not.


Bertie

On Jul 19, 11:17 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote :

On Jul 19, 11:00 am, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:
They may play those games on a simulator, but most military pilots
so value the privilege of flying they do their best not to put it
at risk by displaying that kind of judgment.

Obviously, one military pilot decided to put his privilege at risk.
And I suspect the military didn't bother to revoke that privilege,
which is why it kept its actions (if any) secret. It wouldn't do to
publicly announce that the pilot got off scott-free.

You may wish to investigate further before you make those kinds of
statements

Then again , he may not.

Bertie

When one's information is limited to google, one's information is
pretty limited.

writes:

You may wish to investigate further before you make those kinds of
statements

As soon as the Air Force explains what really happened, I will. Since it
hasn't done so, it obviously has something to hide, and I doubt that it is
flattering to the service or to the pilot.