![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 3, 1:42*pm, JJ Sinclair wrote:
Padded aluminum cusp that slips over trailing edge with web strap that goes over leading edge then down to cable or stake with hooks and ratchet for tightning. Can be easily carried in ship. E-mail me for picture.........see Williams Soaring, set of two for $125 + shipping. JJ I bought 2 back belts with velcro closing (but without the shoulder straps) and a couple of textile motorcycle tiedown loops (not the ratchet straps, but what you put on the bike to protect it from the metal hooks) and had 2 excellent tiedown cuffs for less than $25 lot. For the nervous, they can be stitched. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 5, 7:29*pm, raulb wrote:
I bought 2 back belts with velcro closing (but without the shoulder straps) and a couple of textile motorcycle tiedown loops (not the ratchet straps, but what you put on the bike to protect it from the metal hooks) and had *2 excellent tiedown cuffs for less than $25 lot. *For the nervous, they can be stitched. In the 35 years I have been in this sport I have seen 3 ships upside down on the ramp................so when I leave the ship tied out I make sure its adequately secured. The trailing edge cusp distributes the load and prevents cauging flaps or ailerons. The force is all forward and then down over the leading edge and ratchet'd down against wing stands. I also chock both wheels. JJ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am sorry JJ. I mis-read the posts. I didn't realize you were
selling these things until after I posted. I thought I was thumbing my nose at someone else. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 6, 10:25*am, raulb wrote:
I am sorryJJ. *I mis-read the posts. *I didn't realize you were selling these things until after I posted. *I thought I was thumbing my nose at someone else. I've been using JJ's tie-down kit with my ASW27 successfully. The ASW27 does not have otherwise any acceptable method for tie down which I know off. JJ's tie downs can go over the aileron or flaps without damaging them since the force is mostly all forward. I use them over the aileron/flap juncture. They are small enough to be carried easily in most gliders. I also carry JJ's wing tip detachable wheel, another great JJ product, for aeroretrieves from dirt strips without wing runner. Both kits can be carried easily in my 27 compartment. I recently landed at Minden and used the tie downs without wing stands. The wind was calm when I landed but started blowing at dawn and was gusting over 30 when I arrived at the airport. It even blew the wind sock away, but the tie downs held nicely with no harm to the wings. JJ's tie down kit passed the test :-) Both products are available from Williams Soaring Center: http://store.williamssoaring.com/Mer...tegory_Code=SP Ramy |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 12, 2:13*pm, Ramy wrote:
On Aug 6, 10:25*am, raulb wrote: I am sorryJJ. *I mis-read the posts. *I didn't realize you were selling these things until after I posted. *I thought I was thumbing my nose at someone else. I've been using JJ's tie-down kit with my ASW27 successfully. The ASW27 does not have otherwise any acceptable method for tie down which I know off. JJ's tie downs can go over the aileron or flaps without damaging them since the force is mostly all forward. Ramy I thread nylon webbing around the divebrake pivot on the -27 (the steel tube that runs between the foreward and aft walls of the box about 1.5 inches down inside the divebrake box itself - not the tube that sticks up and holds the panels) then back down over the leading edge of the wing to whatever I'm tying to - no fabrication required. The same principle applies as for JJ's rig only more so since the webbing comes straight up out of the box, makes a 90-degree turn to follow the top surface of the wing to the leading edge and then straight down to the ground. The force on the divebrake pivot would be straight up if the tiedown comes under tension, but I think most of the force would be tranmitted to the top surface of the wing from surface fricton leaving the residual loads on the pivot relatively low. I also put wingstands under both wings so I am not sinching the dihedral out of my wings. I'm told the factory doesn't recommend tying to the divebrakes, but I suspect they were thinking about wrapping rope around the tubes that stick up when the brakes are deployed - pulling on those would put a lot of torque on the pivot. JJ's design looks good (thanks JJ!) as long as they are ensured of pulling the trailing edge forward along the chord - on a control surface I'd worry that it might deflect upward under tension and hurt something. 9B |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The ideal location for the trailing edge cuff is over the trailing
edge of the wing at a location where no control surface is located, as in a standard class ship. On a 15 meter bird like the 27, the whole trailing edge is either flap or aileron. I have used the trailing edge cuff where the flap and aileron meet for years on my Nimbus-3 and LS-6 without causing any control surface damage. Any slight upward pressure is restrained in the flap and aileron push-rods which are loaded in tension as upward forces are trying to raise both control surfaces together. I would however, reconsider pulling upward on the spoiler push-rod which is quite strong in tension, but quite weak when bending loads are applied. JJ I'm told the factory doesn't recommend tying to the divebrakes, but I suspect they were thinking about wrapping rope around the tubes that stick up when the brakes are deployed - pulling on those would put a lot of torque on the pivot. JJ's design looks good (thanks JJ!) as long as they are ensured of pulling the trailing edge forward along the chord - on a control surface I'd worry that it might deflect upward under tension and hurt something. 9B |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 14, 8:05*am, JJ Sinclair wrote:
The ideal location for the trailing edge cuff is over the trailing edge of the wing at a location where no control surface is located, as in a standard class ship. On a 15 meter bird like the 27, the whole trailing edge is either flap or aileron. I have used the trailing edge cuff where the flap and aileron meet for years on my Nimbus-3 and LS-6 without causing any control surface damage. Any slight upward pressure is restrained in the flap and aileron push-rods which are loaded in tension as upward forces are trying to raise both control surfaces together. *I would however, reconsider pulling upward on the spoiler push-rod which is quite strong in tension, but quite weak when bending loads are applied. JJ Hey JJ, I don't tie to the pushrod. I agree, it is is too long and not likely stong in bending load. Instead I thread the webbing around the 1.5- inch long T that is the bottom of the whole pivot for the divebrake. There is one inboard and one outboard on each divebrake - I tend to tie to the outboard one. They are essentially the bottom corners of the whole parallelogram that allows each divebrake to swing up out of the box. Since they run chordwise inside the box and are anchored fore and aft by 3/4" steel bearings set in carbon fiber next to the spar it would seem to me to be one of the more stout parts on the whole wing structure - certainly at least as strong as control surface hinges. But since I have not cut into my wing to see how it's really put together I can't be absolutely sure which is why I was asking around from people who maybe have seen inside a -27 wing. If it's still not totally clear which part I'm talking about I'll take a picture when I get home. I've never had a problem with doing it this way. On the other hand, I've never seen any tiedown actually rip off of the airplane even though I've seen some pretty sketchy methods - so lack of a catastrophe doesn't prove much. I guess you can get away with putting the JJ rig at the flap/divebrake intersection as long as there isn't a lot of play in the control circuit so everything stays snug and aligned. But here's a thought experiment - I cup the cuff over the trailing edge and lay the web across the top surface of the wing, then I squat in front of my glider and yank on the strap from a low angle as hard as I can to simulate a big wind gust trying to lift my glider up. Those -27 control surfaces seem so thin and delicate - it makes me nervous to think about it. But I don't glue gliders back together for a living so maybe I'm being too squeamish. 9B |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Low wing landing, high wing taking off...oops | [email protected] | Piloting | 1 | May 16th 08 09:41 PM |
Soft field landings - low wing vs high wing aircraft | Justin Gombos | Piloting | 19 | May 23rd 07 05:21 AM |
Books on Military Rotary Wing to Civilian Fixed Wing Transition? | Greg Copeland | Piloting | 5 | May 2nd 07 03:23 AM |
High wing to low wing converts...or, visa versa? | Jack Allison | Owning | 99 | January 27th 05 11:10 AM |
Mylar tape wing seals - effect on wing performance | Simon Waddell | Soaring | 8 | January 1st 04 03:46 PM |