A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Heathrow crash



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2  
Old September 5th 08, 01:19 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,969
Default Heathrow crash

Andy Hawkins wrote in
:

Hi,

See the report into the Heathrow crash has concluded it was 'probably'
fuel line icing? Seems a bit vague to me, slightly worrying a definite
cause couldn't be found.



Well, the evidence would have melted away.

Interested in what the big iron drivers on here thought?


I've heard a lot of talk about this accident. this isn't the only 777
that has had thrust issues on approach after a long flight, but it's the
only one who had both wind down at the same time.
I've heard today that the report came out but I can't find it on the
net. I'd be able to comment more fully if I had it to read.

It isn't exactly fuel icing, but what's called waxing. The fuel gets
very gooey near it's freezing point and doesn't flow so good when it
gets into this state. A typical freezing point for fuel is around -39C
and we have a temp gauge to tell us what the temp is in at least one of
the wing tanks.
Long flights in temps of as low as -70C can get the fuel that cold.
Actually, the total temp including skin friction would be about 25
degrees higher than that.
The main lines of defence, mechanically, at least, are that the
hydraulic system radiators are in the fuel tanks. This keeps the
hydraulics form cooking and also warms up the fuel a bit, and the engine
oil is cooled by fuel through a heat exchanger.
Older airplanes, like the older 737s and 727s, had fuel heat. This used
bleed air for short periods of time, usually 30 seconds, and heated up
the fuel in a big way. It had a failing in that if it got stuck on you
had to shut down the engine. That happened to me twice in 727s, but it's
no big deal and the shutdown is precautionary.
For some reason they don't install the bleed air fuel heat on modern
airplanes. I have no idea why, but it would definitely have saved that
BA airplane. I wouldn't be surprised to find they're considering putting
it back in.
The BA flight was polar and very long, so the temps would have been very
low. The crew would have certainly been monitoring the temps. they have
**** all else to do on a long flight like that anyway, and if the temps
were getting low, they would have probably requested a lower altitude,
and/or increased the cruise speed to increase the TAT (total air temp)




Bertie
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BA 777 crash at Heathrow Blueskies Piloting 123 March 18th 08 08:44 PM
Ice accumulation blamed for Heathrow Boeing 777 crash landing? Grumps Piloting 7 January 27th 08 10:55 PM
[Fwd: Concord at Heathrow?] Markus Baur Aviation Photos 3 December 26th 07 11:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.