Flyboys?

"Dudley Henriques" wrote:


"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
.. .
"Dudley Henriques" wrote:

DUDLEY HENRIQUES SAID ;

"Bull ****! This is a constant speed prop. RPM is a
set value. The RPM can be set at 3000 and the
manifold pressure can be anywhere between 15 inches
and 61 inches, and it's the manifold pressure
combined with the set RPM that will determine the
power.....NOT the RPM!!! Are you trying to tell
me that the rotational (energy) of a propeller is
the same at 15 inches as it is at 61?".
-D Henriques

How's that Gordo?

sigh I believe that I'm done with you henry...enough is enough.
Good night.
--

-Gord.

You're done all right!

snort Of course I have... beating you isn't any great shakes
after all...
--

-Gord.

"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
...
"Dudley Henriques" wrote:


"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
.. .
"Dudley Henriques" wrote:

DUDLEY HENRIQUES SAID ;

"Bull ****! This is a constant speed prop. RPM is a
set value. The RPM can be set at 3000 and the
manifold pressure can be anywhere between 15 inches
and 61 inches, and it's the manifold pressure
combined with the set RPM that will determine the
power.....NOT the RPM!!! Are you trying to tell
me that the rotational (energy) of a propeller is
the same at 15 inches as it is at 61?".
-D Henriques

How's that Gordo?

sigh I believe that I'm done with you henry...enough is enough.
Good night.
--

-Gord.

You're done all right!

snort Of course I have... beating you isn't any great shakes
after all...
--

-Gord.

You just never learn do you? It's not about "beating" anyone Gordo. It's
about dialog and discourse. Try it sometime :-)
:-)
DH

"Dudley Henriques" wrote:


"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
.. .
"Dudley Henriques" wrote:


"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
.. .
"Dudley Henriques" wrote:

DUDLEY HENRIQUES SAID ;

"Bull ****! This is a constant speed prop. RPM is a
set value. The RPM can be set at 3000 and the
manifold pressure can be anywhere between 15 inches
and 61 inches, and it's the manifold pressure
combined with the set RPM that will determine the
power.....NOT the RPM!!! Are you trying to tell
me that the rotational (energy) of a propeller is
the same at 15 inches as it is at 61?".
-D Henriques

How's that Gordo?

sigh I believe that I'm done with you henry...enough is enough.
Good night.
--

-Gord.

You're done all right!

snort Of course I have... beating you isn't any great shakes
after all...
--

-Gord.

You just never learn do you? It's not about "beating" anyone Gordo. It's
about dialog and discourse. Try it sometime :-)
:-)
DH


Whatever you say dude...
--

-Gord.

"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
...
"Dudley Henriques" wrote:


"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
.. .
"Dudley Henriques" wrote:


"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
.. .
"Dudley Henriques" wrote:

DUDLEY HENRIQUES SAID ;

"Bull ****! This is a constant speed prop. RPM is a
set value. The RPM can be set at 3000 and the
manifold pressure can be anywhere between 15 inches
and 61 inches, and it's the manifold pressure
combined with the set RPM that will determine the
power.....NOT the RPM!!! Are you trying to tell
me that the rotational (energy) of a propeller is
the same at 15 inches as it is at 61?".
-D Henriques

How's that Gordo?

sigh I believe that I'm done with you henry...enough is enough.
Good night.
--

-Gord.

You're done all right!

snort Of course I have... beating you isn't any great shakes
after all...
--

-Gord.

You just never learn do you? It's not about "beating" anyone Gordo. It's
about dialog and discourse. Try it sometime :-)
:-)
DH


Whatever you say dude...
--

-Gord.

I say props Gordo.......let's talk PROPS!!! :-)
DH

"Dudley Henriques" wrote:



Whatever you say dude...
--

-Gord.

I say props Gordo.......let's talk PROPS!!! :-)
DH

I would if you knew enough to be a challenge for me dude...
--

-Gord.

"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
...
"Dudley Henriques" wrote:



Whatever you say dude...
--

-Gord.

I say props Gordo.......let's talk PROPS!!! :-)
DH

I would if you knew enough to be a challenge for me dude...
--

-Gord.

Well, I can challenge you with this much anyway ole buddy. With this answer,
you now have a total of thirteen straight posts where I have asked you in a
very friendly manner to engage me on the issue that you swear I don't know
anything about with nothing but a personal attack one liner or a personally
insulting remark or both that avoids that engaging discussion. Do you really
think this is doing anything to help you ? I don't think so. And every time
you do it you add one more post to the ever growing list, and don't forget,
these posts are a permanent record.
No Gordo; I'm afraid my initial opinion of you as being an intelligent
person who just made a goof was a bit off. In fact, this whole thing from
beginning to end looks to anyone reading it as exactly what it is; me
bending over backwards to be nice to you; accommodate you in every
conceivable way possible, and you just rambling on and on with one long
continuing series of posts refusing to deal with the issue and filled with
nothing but personal attacks and nonsense. I honestly think you're afraid to
engage on the issue and won't do so for this reason. This leaves you with
nothing but the type of post you've made here again. You're all mouth my
friend, and as you continue posting the way you are with me to any one
person on Usenet, it becomes more and more obvious to anyone reading these
continuous refusals to engage that you are in fact simply avoiding the issue
at hand by posting nothing but personal harassment of a single individual
for reasons of your own.

Are you going to make it fourteen refusals ? :-)
DH

Chris Mark: The entry says, in part, "An aviator, esp. a glamorous,
heroic or daring aviator".

Correct term nowadays is "flyperson" therefore the entry should
read; "glamorous, heroic or daring aviator from a BYGONE ERA
(see: 21st century smart bombs, unmanned combat air vehicles,
Lieutenant Sallys in their maternity uniforms, etc.)

Art Kramer:
Aw shucks. Tweren't nuthin'. (shy grin)

Exactly right. Compared to pilots (esp. fighter pilots) "tweren't
nuthin" glamorous, heroic or daring about navigators and
bombardiers. If anything, sitting out there totally exposed like
a goldfish in a bowl in the plexiglas nosecone of a lumbering
old bomber without being allowed to touch the controls is an
*uneviable* position.

Dudley Henriques:
I say props Gordo.......let's talk PROPS!!! :-)

Gord Beaman:
I would if you knew enough to be a challenge for me dude...

Pardon me for interupting in this incredibly childish ****ing contest
between you two, but valley girl slang went out in the early 80's and
the subject is "flyboys," not props. :-)

"Dudley Henriques" wrote:


"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
.. .
"Dudley Henriques" wrote:



Whatever you say dude...
--

-Gord.

I say props Gordo.......let's talk PROPS!!! :-)
DH

I would if you knew enough to be a challenge for me dude...
--

-Gord.

Well, I can challenge you with this much anyway ole buddy. With this answer,
you now have a total of thirteen straight posts where I have asked you in a
very friendly manner to engage me on the issue that you swear I don't know
anything about with nothing but a personal attack one liner or a personally
insulting remark or both that avoids that engaging discussion. Do you really
think this is doing anything to help you ? I don't think so. And every time
you do it you add one more post to the ever growing list, and don't forget,
these posts are a permanent record.
No Gordo; I'm afraid my initial opinion of you as being an intelligent
person who just made a goof was a bit off. In fact, this whole thing from
beginning to end looks to anyone reading it as exactly what it is; me
bending over backwards to be nice to you; accommodate you in every
conceivable way possible, and you just rambling on and on with one long
continuing series of posts refusing to deal with the issue and filled with
nothing but personal attacks and nonsense. I honestly think you're afraid to
engage on the issue and won't do so for this reason. This leaves you with
nothing but the type of post you've made here again. You're all mouth my
friend, and as you continue posting the way you are with me to any one
person on Usenet, it becomes more and more obvious to anyone reading these
continuous refusals to engage that you are in fact simply avoiding the issue
at hand by posting nothing but personal harassment of a single individual
for reasons of your own.

Are you going to make it fourteen refusals ? :-)
DH

Why not?...it seems to **** you off...sounds like a plan to me...



-Gord.

"You are completely focused on RPM as the
single factor producing rotational velocity"
-Guess who?

Subject: Flyboys?
From: "Dudley Henriques"
Date: 12/17/03 9:17 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: et


"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
.. .
"Dudley Henriques" wrote:


"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
.. .
"Dudley Henriques" wrote:

DUDLEY HENRIQUES SAID ;

"Bull ****! This is a constant speed prop. RPM is a
set value. The RPM can be set at 3000 and the
manifold pressure can be anywhere between 15 inches
and 61 inches, and it's the manifold pressure
combined with the set RPM that will determine the
power.....NOT the RPM!!! Are you trying to tell
me that the rotational (energy) of a propeller is
the same at 15 inches as it is at 61?".
-D Henriques

How's that Gordo?

sigh I believe that I'm done with you henry...enough is enough.
Good night.
--

-Gord.

You're done all right!

snort Of course I have... beating you isn't any great shakes
after all...
--

-Gord.

You just never learn do you? It's not about "beating" anyone Gordo. It's
about dialog and discourse. Try it sometime :-)
:-)
DH




I think he may be discussing an engine pulling 61" of mercury at a constant
speed of zero RPM. (guffaw)



Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Flyboys?
From: "Dudley Henriques"
Date: 12/17/03 9:17 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: et


"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
.. .
"Dudley Henriques" wrote:


"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
.. .
"Dudley Henriques" wrote:

DUDLEY HENRIQUES SAID ;

"Bull ****! This is a constant speed prop. RPM is a
set value. The RPM can be set at 3000 and the
manifold pressure can be anywhere between 15 inches
and 61 inches, and it's the manifold pressure
combined with the set RPM that will determine the
power.....NOT the RPM!!! Are you trying to tell
me that the rotational (energy) of a propeller is
the same at 15 inches as it is at 61?".
-D Henriques

How's that Gordo?

sigh I believe that I'm done with you henry...enough is enough.
Good night.
--

-Gord.

You're done all right!

snort Of course I have... beating you isn't any great shakes
after all...
--

-Gord.

You just never learn do you? It's not about "beating" anyone Gordo. It's
about dialog and discourse. Try it sometime :-)
:-)
DH




I think he may be discussing an engine pulling 61" of mercury at a
constant
speed of zero RPM. (guffaw)

It's a shame really. I don't want to fight with this guy. I've tried
ignoring him. I've tried friendly engagement. I've tried every way I know to
either make friends with him or get rid of him. He just keeps coming
on...again and again. I never post to him. It's always him posting under me,
changing the subject into some personal attack thing. I wish I knew what his
problem is but I don't.
This kind of thing happens all the time on Usenet. You somehow pick up one
of these people who think it's about keeping score. He goes one down and
becomes a heated enemy for the next thousand years or so.
Oh well, perhaps he'll get tired of doing it. Ford tried reassigning the
thread. Maybe that will work. I'll try my best not to respond to him any
more than I have to. Maybe that will help a bit as well.
We'll see!! :-)
Dudley Henriques
International Fighter Pilots Fellowship
Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired
For personal email, please replace
the z's with e's.
dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt