A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Transponder vs. Portable Transponder Detectors



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 15th 08, 03:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Andy[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,565
Default Transponder vs. Portable Transponder Detectors

On Dec 14, 9:59*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote:
Personally I wish they were mandatory in areas around Reno (I don't
want to lose access to those areas because *non-transponder equipped
glider is involved in a collision with a passenger jet). We were very
lucky the ASG-29 and Hawker collision involved no fatalities.


But the ASG-29 was transponder equipped was it not?

If transponder use becomes mandatory it still does not mean they will
all be turned on, all be squawking mode C, and all reporting the
correct altitude.

I'm quite sensitive to this at the moment as my airplane has developed
a problem that causes the mode C report to sometimes be thousands of
feet in error until the transponder or encoder warm up.

I take my Zaon MRX with me any time I fly including in other people's
aircraft. Once you own one of these you won't want to leave home
without it.

Still don't have a transponder in the glider so I guess I'll stay away
from Reno.

Andy
  #2  
Old December 15th 08, 04:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Darryl Ramm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,403
Default Transponder vs. Portable Transponder Detectors

On Dec 15, 7:46*am, Andy wrote:
On Dec 14, 9:59*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote:

Personally I wish they were mandatory in areas around Reno (I don't
want to lose access to those areas because *non-transponder equipped
glider is involved in a collision with a passenger jet). We were very
lucky the ASG-29 and Hawker collision involved no fatalities.


But the ASG-29 was transponder equipped was it not?

If transponder use becomes mandatory it still does not mean they will
all be turned on, all be squawking mode C, and all reporting the
correct altitude.

I'm quite sensitive to this at the moment as my airplane has developed
a problem that causes the mode C report to sometimes be thousands of
feet in error until the transponder or encoder warm up.

I take my Zaon MRX with me any time I fly including in other people's
aircraft. *Once you own one of these you won't want to leave home
without it.

Still don't have a transponder in the glider so I guess I'll stay away
from Reno.

Andy


Well your transponder is a safety item so get it fixed. Worse case
replace the encoder, they are not that expensive.

I think everybody who flies with an MRX is greatly impressed with
them. However if you do not have a transponder you really are not
participating in the ATC system. So to the original question,
(especially for Reno) get a transponder first, MRX second if you can't
afford both.

By mandatory I mean mandatory to be turned on and used. The ASG-29 had
the transponder turned off, for what can at best can be described as a
confused set of reasons. Procedures for contacting approach determine
pretty quickly if the transponder is working or not and squawking the
correct altitude. Most new transponders will also display the pressure
altitude so working out if the encoder is working or not is bit of a
non-issue. So what other excuse is left... worries about powering
transponders seem a little strained given modern encoder and
transponder power power consumption, and alternative battery and solar
panel options, especially given the risks involved to the sport (it's
the risk to passenger carrying jets the impact on out sport that I
care about, not the individual glider pilot).

Crossing extremely high traffic corridors near place like Reno, has
nothing to do with flying around the boondocks so who cares if you
have a transponder at many glider sites. If we have another mid-air,
especially with passenger fatalities, I suspect we'll have lots more
restrictions than just requiring transponders in high-traffic areas.

Darryl

  #3  
Old December 16th 08, 07:32 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Ian[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 89
Default Transponder vs. Portable Transponder Detectors

On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:46:04 -0800, Andy wrote:

I'm quite sensitive to this at the moment as my airplane has developed a
problem that causes the mode C report to sometimes be thousands of feet
in error until the transponder or encoder warm up.


Try a new battery. I had the same symptoms with a Becker + Ameriking
encoder. A new battery made them go away.

Ian
  #4  
Old December 16th 08, 07:44 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Andy[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,565
Default Transponder vs. Portable Transponder Detectors

On Dec 16, 12:32*am, Ian wrote:

Try a new battery. I had the same symptoms with a Becker + Ameriking
encoder. A new battery made them go away.


Thanks for the tip but this is a PA28-180 with an alternator. Problem
was intermittent last winter, gone in the summer, and back again now
winter is here. I'm in the middle of some cold soak testing but
results so far point to the encoder (ACK A-30).

Andy
  #5  
Old December 20th 08, 07:25 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Ian[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 89
Default Transponder vs. Portable Transponder Detectors

On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:44:19 -0800, Andy wrote:

Thanks for the tip but this is a PA28-180 with an alternator. Problem
was intermittent last winter, gone in the summer, and back again now
winter is here. I'm in the middle of some cold soak testing but results
so far point to the encoder (ACK A-30).


I have no experience with aircraft with engines. But it seems these
encoders can put out nonsense flight level data. Your experience -
Winter, mine - dying battery, seem to indicate that it does this when it
is not warm enough.

Whatever the fix, it is worth knowing that this can happen. Does yours
come right once it has been running a while?

Ian
  #6  
Old December 16th 08, 08:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bob Kuykendall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,345
Default Transponder vs. Portable Transponder Detectors

On Dec 15, 7:46*am, Andy wrote:

...I'm quite sensitive to this at the moment as my airplane has developed
a problem that causes the mode C report to sometimes be thousands of
feet in error until the transponder or encoder warm up.


Check the encoder manual to see if the encoder has a built-in heating
coil (many do). If so, also check that it is getting power.

Thanks, Bob K.
  #7  
Old December 16th 08, 09:49 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Darryl Ramm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,403
Default Transponder vs. Portable Transponder Detectors

On Dec 16, 12:53*pm, Bob Kuykendall wrote:
On Dec 15, 7:46*am, Andy wrote:

...I'm quite sensitive to this at the moment as my airplane has developed
a problem that causes the mode C report to sometimes be thousands of
feet in error until the transponder or encoder warm up.


Check the encoder manual to see if the encoder has a built-in heating
coil (many do). If so, also check that it is getting power.

Thanks, Bob K.


The ACK-30 around room temperature should draw around 9mA/12V once in
steady state. Throw it in your freezer in a plastic bag and get it
really cold, with the heater warming up it should draw about 400mA/12V
(for ~minute or so).

Darryl
  #8  
Old December 17th 08, 02:46 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,096
Default Transponder vs. Portable Transponder Detectors

Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Dec 16, 12:53 pm, Bob Kuykendall wrote:
On Dec 15, 7:46 am, Andy wrote:

...I'm quite sensitive to this at the moment as my airplane has developed
a problem that causes the mode C report to sometimes be thousands of
feet in error until the transponder or encoder warm up.

Check the encoder manual to see if the encoder has a built-in heating
coil (many do). If so, also check that it is getting power.

Thanks, Bob K.


The ACK-30 around room temperature should draw around 9mA/12V once in
steady state. Throw it in your freezer in a plastic bag and get it
really cold, with the heater warming up it should draw about 400mA/12V
(for ~minute or so).


It's not quite that good, unfortunately: according to the manual,
operating current is 60 ma; the time to warm up from 0 F is 210 seconds.
I can't find the source of the numbers, but the heater will continue to
draw heater current at 0 deg F, with a total draw around 90-100 milliamps.

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA
* Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

* Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4
* New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more

* "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org
  #9  
Old December 17th 08, 04:10 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Darryl Ramm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,403
Default Transponder vs. Portable Transponder Detectors

On Dec 16, 6:46*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote:
Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Dec 16, 12:53 pm, Bob Kuykendall wrote:
On Dec 15, 7:46 am, Andy wrote:


...I'm quite sensitive to this at the moment as my airplane has developed
a problem that causes the mode C report to sometimes be thousands of
feet in error until the transponder or encoder warm up.
Check the encoder manual to see if the encoder has a built-in heating
coil (many do). If so, also check that it is getting power.


Thanks, Bob K.


The ACK-30 around room temperature should draw around 9mA/12V once in
steady state. Throw it in your freezer in a plastic bag and get it
really cold, with the heater warming up it should draw about 400mA/12V
(for ~minute or so).


It's not quite that good, unfortunately: according to the manual,
operating current is 60 ma; the time to warm up from 0 F is 210 seconds.
I can't find the source of the numbers, but the heater will continue to
draw heater current at 0 deg F, with a total draw around 90-100 milliamps..

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA
* Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

* Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes"http://tinyurl.com/y739x4
* * * New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more

* "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" atwww.motorglider.org


Oh doh, that as a typo. Should have been the 90mA no 9mA, which is
what I think I had measured but the manual says 60mA. May just depend
on ambient temp of how power consumption is averaged.

Darryl
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
transponder LJ Blodgett Home Built 4 March 19th 07 05:22 PM
wtb transponder LJ Aviation Marketplace 0 September 7th 06 05:05 PM
Which Transponder? Danl Johnson Soaring 10 October 29th 04 05:54 PM
WTB Transponder Roy Bourgeois Soaring 0 July 2nd 04 06:44 PM
Portable Carbon Monoxide Detectors Cecil E. Chapman Piloting 9 November 18th 03 10:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.