A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

175 or 250 watt transponder?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 8th 09, 08:20 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
John Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 256
Default 175 or 250 watt transponder?

Bottom line: If you want to fly above 15k in airspace where a
transponder is mandatory, then 250W is required or you will not fly
there. Otherwise install whatever you want. As there is little
difference in price as well as in power consumtion, I don't see why you
would want to go for the weaker unit, though.

A side note: If you want to stick with a mode C transponder, then there
are a lot of used ones available in Europe pretty cheaply, as Europe is
mandating mode S now and everybody must switch. If on the other hand you
want to buy a new unit, then go for mode S. It doesn't cost much more,
it draws less current and it will have a much better resell value.
  #2  
Old January 8th 09, 10:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,096
Default 175 or 250 watt transponder?

John Smith wrote:
Bottom line: If you want to fly above 15k in airspace where a
transponder is mandatory, then 250W is required or you will not fly
there.


Do you have a reference to the regulation concerning power requirement?
I haven't been able to find it, and people just seem to rely on the
product descriptions when I ask about it.

hough.

A side note: If you want to stick with a mode C transponder, then there
are a lot of used ones available in Europe pretty cheaply, as Europe is
mandating mode S now and everybody must switch. If on the other hand you
want to buy a new unit, then go for mode S. It doesn't cost much more,
it draws less current and it will have a much better resell value.


Can you tell me which Mode S transponder you are talking about? The ones
that I see for sale in the USA are much more expensive ($600 comparing
the 175W and 150W models of Becker; $1100 comparing the 250W models of
Becker).

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA
* Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

* Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4
* New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more

* "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org
  #3  
Old January 9th 09, 09:12 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
John Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 256
Default 175 or 250 watt transponder?

Eric Greenwell wrote:

Do you have a reference to the regulation concerning power requirement?
I haven't been able to find it, and people just seem to rely on the
product descriptions when I ask about it.


Actually, I do, too. I see no reason not to believe the manufactorers.
According to Funkwerk, output requirements are higher for tansponders
which are operated in aircraft flying at altitudes above 15,000ft or
speeds above 175kt. Unfortuately (of fortunately), gliders often operate
higher than 15,000ft.

I write this with the European situation in mind where Mode S is already
mandatory. As air traffic is typically an international thing, I would
assume that the FAA and EASA have been reasonable enough to discuss this
and to agree to the same requirements.

BTW, problably not the cheapest but one of the more popular mode S
transponders in Europe is the TRT800H by Funkwerk.
http://www.funkwerk-avionics.com/cms...4&changelang=4
  #4  
Old January 9th 09, 06:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bob Kuykendall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,345
Default 175 or 250 watt transponder?

On Jan 9, 1:12*am, John Smith wrote:

Actually, I do, too. I see no reason not to believe the manufactorers...


I have this bridge for sale...
  #5  
Old January 9th 09, 06:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,096
Default 175 or 250 watt transponder?

John Smith wrote:
Eric Greenwell wrote:

Do you have a reference to the regulation concerning power
requirement? I haven't been able to find it, and people just seem to
rely on the product descriptions when I ask about it.


Actually, I do, too. I see no reason not to believe the manufactorers.
According to Funkwerk, output requirements are higher for tansponders
which are operated in aircraft flying at altitudes above 15,000ft or
speeds above 175kt. Unfortuately (of fortunately), gliders often operate
higher than 15,000ft.


My problem is the manufacturers do not specifically say their 250W
transponders are required by the FAA, in gliders, above 15,000'. They
often refer to EASA or other regulations that just hint at it, or make
non-specific remarks that may apply only to certified airplanes. It
looks like Darryl has found what I want, however.

I write this with the European situation in mind where Mode S is already
mandatory. As air traffic is typically an international thing, I would
assume that the FAA and EASA have been reasonable enough to discuss this
and to agree to the same requirements.


And they probably have, for international operations, but for gliders in
just the USA? Or in a wave window? We should not assume anything about
in-country requirements, because regulations do vary. Note that Europe
is going to Mode S and 8.33 radio channel spacing; the USA is not.

BTW, problably not the cheapest but one of the more popular mode S
transponders in Europe is the TRT800H by Funkwerk.
http://www.funkwerk-avionics.com/cms...4&changelang=4


I know there are many choices in Europe for Mode S, but I am aware of
only two brands sold in the USA that have units suitable for gliders:
Becker and Garrecht. The least costly is still $600 more than a Mode C unit.

If the Mode S units had a significantly lower power requirement, they
might be worth the extra money. Comparing the datasheets of the Becker
models, both the standby and operating drains seem similar. Perhaps I am
misinterpreting the figures.

The Garrecht unit seems to promise a worthwhile reduction in drain, in
part because it does not require an external encoder. It costs almost
$1000 more than a Becker + encoder, however.

Perhaps some enterprising soaring supply company should buy a lot of
those unusable Mode C transponders from Europe and offer them for sale
to USA customers at attractive prices.

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA
* Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

* Updated! "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4
* New Jan '08 - sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more

* "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Transponder vs. Portable Transponder Detectors John Murphy Soaring 16 December 20th 08 07:25 AM
Transponder for ASW-19 jcarlyle Soaring 0 June 26th 07 11:21 PM
Transponder Tom Cummings Instrument Flight Rules 46 October 23rd 05 10:34 PM
1 watt and 5 watt LED for Nav lights? Bill Home Built 21 May 10th 04 05:15 PM
FA: 10 Watt - Solid State Digital VHF- Transceiver Unicom OH Aviation Marketplace 0 March 30th 04 02:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.