![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Hobo" wrote in message ... I tried asking this question before and got zero responses;( This NG loves to talk about whether or not stealth aircraft can be detected. What about the issue of detecting SAM radar? If LPI, or Quiet Radar techniques are used on the ground radars guiding SAMs this will make it difficult to find and destroy the radars. Similarly, if the same pseudo-random noise techniques are used for the datalink the SAMs guidance will be harder to jam. If one cannot bomb SAM radar or jam the datalink than flying in enemy airspace becomes vastly more difficult. The basic ideas behind LPI radar seem to come from the same information theory behind much of the cell phone industry so the knowledge base is widespread. Most modern SAM guidance techniques are heading towards an active homing system. The French have a common active hommer on the AAM mica and the SAM aster. The SAM is launched preloaded with the co-ordinates and velocity of the target and the missile guides itself using an inertial guidance system to the vicinity of the target at which point the radar lights up. Usually a data link is also available for midcourse corrections. In the case of AMRAAM there is I believe only 1 midcourse update provided if at all. In this way: 1 The command link can be of low bandwidth and is easily given the characteristics of security and LPI. It is not neccesary to provide feedback to the missile since it has an inertial guidance system. 2 Little warning is given since there is no tracking and illuminating radar 'spiking' the target. 3 Jamming and stealth against the missile is less effective as the radar's illuminating power increases as the missile active radar approaches. 4 Multiple missiles can be launched. The next stage of radar appears to be impulse radar. This AFAIKS requires cryogenics. It consists of sequences of impulses of around 1 wavelength that contain broad spectrums of frequencies that can excite any resonance's within a stealth structure. It also is extremely capable of resolving chaff or terrain like ocean waves and ripples. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ham sandwich navigation and radar failure | David Brooks | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | December 31st 03 12:15 AM |
Vietnam era F-4s Q | Ed Rasimus | Military Aviation | 87 | September 27th 03 03:59 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
F15E Radar question. | Bill Silvey | Military Aviation | 5 | August 30th 03 06:17 PM |
Marine Radar in a plane? | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 31 | August 13th 03 06:56 PM |