![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "C Knowles" wrote in message om... That's a darn good question. The 767 is available now and has enormous political support. But the 7E7 is the same size and has what you'd want in an OTS tanker; range & efficiency. The 767 is more of an interim tanker until KC-X comes along, which is why leasing is a good idea. If the 7E7 were to come on line we could sell/give back the KC-767s. But getting in now seems the smart thing to do, as with the KC-135/707. Most avionics would be the same, as with the KC-10. Better yet - why not procure some of each? There have been statements that there is a risk in having all the tankers be of one design in case that design is grounded for some reason. Smoke. This is just to justify the 767 buy. This type of a/c is rarely grounded and even then it is as a precautionary measure, i.e., the military could still fly them in a crisis. It does not justify the huge added expense. You know that whatever the Air Force buys will be flying for 40+ years - why not get the latest, most efficient, and lowest maintenance aircraft? Exactly. There is talk of a purpose built tanker but that would be hard to justify the $. However, by leasing a small number of 767s the AF can delay the KC-X decision and wait for any new technology aircraft to take shape, such as X wing, blended wing, etc. But the currently approved plan is only for the lease of 20 aircraft, with purchase of the remaining 80. Time is apparently of the essence in this case, with the current schedule looking at delivery of the last 767 tankers in the 2014 timeframe--it would be hard to imagine any 7E7 tanker variant being available for delivery before maybe 2010 at the very earliest, and likely later, given that it is scheduled for first flight in 07 (a year after the first 767 mods are accepted under the current plan) and civil certification in 08. One advantage to the current 767 program is that we can take advantage of the boom/aircraft integration effort already underway on behalf of the Italian and Japanese purchases of the 767 tanker mods--depending on the 7E7 means you'd have to wait for the integration and associated testwork to be repeated all over again, making 2010 an optimistic availability date. Brooks Curt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
Airbus tankers for USAF? | noname | Military Aviation | 15 | December 6th 03 03:55 PM |
Tankers | WaltBJ | Military Aviation | 1 | November 19th 03 08:01 PM |
aging tankers to be replaced | James Anatidae | Military Aviation | 45 | September 2nd 03 12:44 PM |
Israel may lease Boeing 767 tankers. | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 0 | August 8th 03 12:33 AM |