![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Peter Holm wrote: As you concede yourself, when it comes to aerobatic airplanes there exists a source of financing which generallty doesnīt exist for private airplanes: Sponsoring. Therefore, the cost argument in itself can only explain the relative scarcity of turboprop engines in private aircraft, but not the near absence of turboprop engines in aerobatic aircraft. Airshow aerobatics have sponsorships. Competition aerobatics don't have as much in the way of sponsorships except at the highest levels. Even with sponsorships, there is a big difference between a $50K Lycoming and a $500K+ PT-6. The Turbo Raven was just a show plane, in the same category as the jet powered Waco. Fun to watch, but totally ridiculous. Well now, this jet powered Whacko is nothing but a piston biplane with a turbojet strapped to its belly. And this turbojet engine has a bent exhaust pipe - kind of like a turboprop. As long as I havenīt seen more data on this plane or seen it fly, I wonīt believe that this setup has much more than decorative value. I've seen it fly, and it does some pretty impressive vertical climbs. Some stats on the plane are available at: http://www.franklinairshow.com/jetstats.htm There is also video on that site, doesn't show much of the vertical though. John -- John Clear - http://www.panix.com/~jac |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RIAT and Video | Patrouilles du Monde | Aerobatics | 0 | July 10th 04 07:18 PM |