![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 8, 10:30*am, Jim White wrote:
I doubt it Noel. The heads do ride on air but for sterility reasons in a sealed air capsule which was sealed in a clean room. The most likely problem is that the air tight capsule which is sealed with a sticky label will be compromised. This will ultimately lead to contamination and disk failure. The smallest mite of dust etc will cause a head crash. Jim At 08:02 08 April 2009, noel.wade wrote: Just a quick FYI: Hard-drive based Camcorders are a bad idea, as most of them are not qualified for use above 10,000' MSL (thanks to Kempton Izuno for pointing this out and saving me some $$)... *The problem is the cushion of air that the hard drive read/write heads float on, above/ beside the platters... as air density goes down these things become more susceptible to striking the spinning hard drive platters - not a good thing! --Noel Nope. That is a common misunderstanding. Most hard drive units are not sealed and are vented via a very fine filter. The reduction in air density and head flight height is the reason those hard drives have an altitude limit. Some people with hard disk drive based iPods trying to use them in gliders found out the hard way. While you might get lucky for a long time I would worry about the vendor's max altitude specs. Some specialist drives are pressure sealed, not likely the ones you'll find in consumer equipment. Darryl |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not a problem in the cloudy little UK, where we dream of getting above
4000ft AMSL due to our generally low cloudbases! Thanks for pointing this issue out though. So I guess it's Mini DV, Mini DVD or SD card camcorders. Any known problems with these? One other issue we have found with exterior mounted cameras at high altitudes, or on cold days, is that the cold affects the battery performance. Make sure that the batteries are fully charged up before you start, and don't expect them to last for too long. Derek C At 08:02 08 April 2009, noel.wade wrote: Just a quick FYI: Hard-drive based Camcorders are a bad idea, as most of them are not qualified for use above 10,000' MSL (thanks to Kempton Izuno for pointing this out and saving me some $$)... The problem is the cushion of air that the hard drive read/write heads float on, above/ beside the platters... as air density goes down these things become more susceptible to striking the spinning hard drive platters - not a good thing! --Noel |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:42:28 -0700, NG wrote:
Anybody have a recommendation for a small thin digital camera with decent quality that might be suitable for taping to a winglet for inflight down-the-wing shots, with a connection for an rf remote? Have not been able to find a small camera with remote option. Thanks... It might be worth looking at the FlyCamOne, which was developed to take pictures from RC models. It is small, light (37g), records to an SD card and can be remotely tripped via an el-Cheapo RC set or configured to take a shot every few seconds. The resolution looks to be adequate and the cost is pretty reasonable. http://zoogz/reference/reference/misc_photo.html#fco -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 9, 8:34*am, Martin Gregorie
wrote: On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:42:28 -0700, NG wrote: Anybody have a recommendation for a small thin digital camera with decent quality that might be suitable for taping to a winglet for inflight down-the-wing shots, with a connection for an rf remote? Have not been able to find a small camera with remote option. Thanks... It might be worth looking at the FlyCamOne, which was developed to take pictures from RC models. It is small, light (37g), records to an SD card and can be remotely tripped via an el-Cheapo RC set or configured to take a shot every few seconds. *The resolution looks to be adequate and the cost is pretty reasonable. http://zoogz/reference/reference/misc_photo.html#fco -- martin@ * | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org * * * | http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showa...mentid=1377552 Not bad for what it is. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It might be worth looking at the FlyCamOne, which was developed to take
pictures from RC models. It is small, light (37g), records to an SD card and can be remotely tripped via an el-Cheapo RC set or configured to take a shot every few seconds. Â*The resolution looks to be adequate and the cost is pretty reasonable. http://zoogz/reference/reference/misc_photo.html#fco Sorry - that should have been: http://www.flycamone2.com/ or http://www.blip.com.au/item.aspx?itemid=49 which shows prices and another video. BTW, anybody fancy a small, light backup logger? http://www.blip.com.au/item.aspx?itemID=62 -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[10/13] - 11 Port Wingtip.JPG (1/1) Part 2 | Waldo.Pepper[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | September 10th 08 11:23 PM |
Camera mounts for small digital camera | kestrel254 | Soaring | 5 | August 19th 08 04:03 PM |
L-23 wingtip wheel modification | 5Z | Soaring | 0 | February 8th 06 05:50 PM |
Visible wingtip vortex! | Bill | Piloting | 23 | October 25th 05 10:37 PM |
Wingtip Vortex: Heavy, Clean, Slow - Why? | Eric Nospam | Piloting | 23 | January 21st 05 03:09 AM |