![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Cost overruns by Northrop on B-2 as well as some scandal on parts ordering on missile guidance systems for the Electronics Division certainly muddied the political waters and may have cost Northrop some points. Would that be on the Peasekeeper's guidance system? ISTR hearing about that back then. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" Smithsonian Institution Press ISBN #1-58834-103-8 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 19:21:38 GMT, Scott Ferrin
wrote: Cost overruns by Northrop on B-2 as well as some scandal on parts ordering on missile guidance systems for the Electronics Division certainly muddied the political waters and may have cost Northrop some points. Would that be on the Peasekeeper's guidance system? ISTR hearing about that back then. Yep. The supply system was incredibly convoluted. For example, I had one of two Mac II computers in the training section. I wanted some off-the-shelf software (arcane stuff like MS Word). It took a purchase order that required NINE signatures and more than six weeks. Over in Electronics Div. they were up against production deadlines. Some creative problem solver garnered petty cash and went open market to buy the necessary materials. Production deliveries on time. When the supply system deliveries came six weeks later, the excess material got back-doored to the dumpster. Result was an investigation for misuse of government....blah...blah...blah. Had to swear to always use the most inefficient methods under penalty of law for all future deliveries. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" Smithsonian Institution Press ISBN #1-58834-103-8 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Rasimus wrote:
Over in Electronics Div. they were up against production deadlines. Some creative problem solver garnered petty cash and went open market to buy the necessary materials. Production deliveries on time. When the supply system deliveries came six weeks later, the excess material got back-doored to the dumpster. Result was an investigation for misuse of government....blah...blah...blah. Had to swear to always use the most inefficient methods under penalty of law for all future deliveries. Ah, government supply chain... Back in the early 1980s, I was working the flight line on F-4Es. We had a nice little supply room, with all of the little hardware you'd normally need. One of the pieces was a small rivet. Little bitty aluminum rivets, less than 1/4" wide and maybe 3/8" long. I needed a few one day, and got the chance to open a new bag (they were about 1000 per bag). Those little rivets were about a buck each, according to the price listed on the inventory sheet on the bag. Just under $1000 per bag of 1000 rivets, delivered to the base through the USAF supply chain. That seemed like, well, a *lot*, so I checked up on it. In town, in a hardware store, you could buy the same rivets (same manufacturer, same serial number on the bag, same everything) for about $10 per bag of 1000. I called the manufacturer. The difference, I was told, was because the company had several full time employees who did nothing at all but monitor their military sales (they were a sole-source supplier for that bit, and didn't sell much else to the government). They were very unhappy about it, too, since they would rather have just sold the things for a decent price. Some months later, I noticed the price on the bags in the bin had gone down to only $50 or so per bag... I wonder who got the bonus for "cost cutting" on that one? -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chad Irby" wrote in message . com... Ed Rasimus wrote: Over in Electronics Div. they were up against production deadlines. Some creative problem solver garnered petty cash and went open market to buy the necessary materials. Production deliveries on time. When the supply system deliveries came six weeks later, the excess material got back-doored to the dumpster. Result was an investigation for misuse of government....blah...blah...blah. Had to swear to always use the most inefficient methods under penalty of law for all future deliveries. Ah, government supply chain... Nope, Northrop got caught delivering non-compliant guidance systems with falsified records. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Back in the early 1980s, I was working the flight line on F-4Es. We had
a nice little supply room, with all of the little hardware you'd normally need. One of the pieces was a small rivet. Little bitty aluminum rivets, less than 1/4" wide and maybe 3/8" long. I needed a few one day, and got the chance to open a new bag (they were about 1000 per bag). Those little rivets were about a buck each, according to the price listed on the inventory sheet on the bag. Just under $1000 per bag of 1000 rivets, delivered to the base through the USAF supply chain. That seemed like, well, a *lot*, so I checked up on it. In town, in a hardware store, you could buy the same rivets (same manufacturer, same serial number on the bag, same everything) for about $10 per bag of 1000. I called the manufacturer. The difference, I was told, was because the company had several full time employees who did nothing at all but monitor their military sales (they were a sole-source supplier for that bit, and didn't sell much else to the government). They were very unhappy about it, too, since they would rather have just sold the things for a decent price. Some months later, I noticed the price on the bags in the bin had gone down to only $50 or so per bag... I wonder who got the bonus for "cost cutting" on that one? Look at it as a form of a full employment program. Jobs = happy people = votes = happy politicians. Pay for a hokey job for someone or pay for their welfare checks. Actually, consider that fact the the "system"still supports a fleet of planes worldwide and has done so for years relatively effectively, so it can't be all bad. Usually it is the exceptions and special orders that seem to get screwed up the most. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fuel Lines & thread compound | Evan Carew | Home Built | 1 | September 30th 04 05:28 AM |
Contract Tower Program - Discussion Thread | running with scissors | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | April 22nd 04 04:04 AM |
ATC Privatization - Discussion Thread | running with scissors | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | April 17th 04 09:09 PM |
Fuel line thread sealant | Paul Lee | Home Built | 7 | February 26th 04 12:44 AM |
interesting thread today on rec.aviation.military | Chris Spierings | Military Aviation | 0 | November 12th 03 05:17 PM |