![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Starer wrote:
In many other European countries gliding is part of the fabric of everyday life and I would expect reporting there to be better informed and as a result, much more balanced and accurate. ![]() A member of my club recently made a perfectly normal, safe outlanding in a field in Lincolnshire near to a field where a cricket match was in progress. Unfortunately the local rag found out and reported it in the usual sensationalised "Glider Pilot in Shock Horror Death Plunge" kind of language. Unfortuately, this is the norm rather than the exception even in Germany. For the very least it's titled as an "emergency landing". |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "José Jiménez" nospam@please wrote in message ... David Starer wrote: In many other European countries gliding is part of the fabric of everyday life and I would expect reporting there to be better informed and as a result, much more balanced and accurate. ![]() A member of my club recently made a perfectly normal, safe outlanding in a field in Lincolnshire near to a field where a cricket match was in progress. Unfortunately the local rag found out and reported it in the usual sensationalised "Glider Pilot in Shock Horror Death Plunge" kind of language. Unfortuately, this is the norm rather than the exception even in Germany. For the very least it's titled as an "emergency landing". At least that's a "landing" of some sort; here it's usually reported as a "crash", even when it's blindingly obvious there wasn't one! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 17, 8:26*am, "David Starer" wrote:
"José Jiménez" nospam@please wrote in message ... David Starer wrote: In many other European countries gliding is part of the fabric of everyday life and I would expect reporting there to be better informed and as a result, much more balanced and accurate. ![]() A member of my club recently made a perfectly normal, safe outlanding in a field in Lincolnshire near to a field where a cricket match was in progress. Unfortunately the local rag found out and reported it in the usual sensationalised "Glider Pilot in Shock Horror Death Plunge" kind of language. Unfortuately, this is the norm rather than the exception even in Germany. For the very least it's titled as an "emergency landing". At least that's a "landing" of some sort; here it's usually reported as a "crash", even when it's blindingly obvious there wasn't one! The only bright spot is that these local rags are rapidly dying for lack of advertising revenue. The screaming headlines and lurid stories are a desperate attempt to hang on to readers for their advertisers as long as possible. Real "news" vanished from their pages long ago - pretty much everyone knows that. The Internet with it's unlimited choice has won. For newspapers, the 'light at the end of the tunnel' is the headlight on a train named Google. I still relish the look on the face of a newspaper marketing guy who knocked on my door with an unfortunate lad in tow trying to get me to take the local paper for "free" when I told him, "No, I don't want to pay the refuse collector to haul it away." If you can't sell "free", you're toast. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some years ago I made the front page of the Leicester Mercury when I made a
field landing during a Hus Bos Comp. Allegedly I was 'desperately seeking somewhere to land', 'swooped low over a farmhouse', and then 'crashed into a field where some local schoolchildren had been playing only the previous day'. Actually it was an out and return task, I had identified the field as being suitable when I got a bit low on the way out, some 30 minutes before I actually landed in it, and did a very copybook circuit and landing. It was a nice big field with no obstructions on the approach, stubble surface, and no animals or children! They also got my name and the make of my glider wrong. The only facts they got right were that I was unhurt and the glider was undamaged! They never spoke to me, only a couple of witnesses and the police who had checked that I was OK. What can you do? Derek Copeland At 15:01 17 June 2009, bildan wrote: On Jun 17, 8:26=A0am, "David Starer" wrote: "Jos=E9 Jim=E9nez" wrote in message ... David Starer wrote: In many other European countries gliding is part of the fabric of everyday life and I would expect reporting there to be better informed and as a result, much more balanced and accurate. A member of my club recently made a perfectly normal, safe outlanding = in a field in Lincolnshire near to a field where a cricket match was in progress. Unfortunately the local rag found out and reported it in the usual sensationalised "Glider Pilot in Shock Horror Death Plunge" kind= of language. Unfortuately, this is the norm rather than the exception even in German= y. For the very least it's titled as an "emergency landing". At least that's a "landing" of some sort; here it's usually reported as a "crash", even when it's blindingly obvious there wasn't one! The only bright spot is that these local rags are rapidly dying for lack of advertising revenue. The screaming headlines and lurid stories are a desperate attempt to hang on to readers for their advertisers as long as possible. Real "news" vanished from their pages long ago - pretty much everyone knows that. The Internet with it's unlimited choice has won. For newspapers, the 'light at the end of the tunnel' is the headlight on a train named Google. I still relish the look on the face of a newspaper marketing guy who knocked on my door with an unfortunate lad in tow trying to get me to take the local paper for "free" when I told him, "No, I don't want to pay the refuse collector to haul it away." If you can't sell "free", you're toast. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"brave pilot narrowly avoids school" etc. Well, of course s/he would,
school buildings are very hard and they will hurt. School playing fields are much more accommodating (with or without soft squishy schoolchildren). At 17:00 17 June 2009, Del C wrote: Some years ago I made the front page of the Leicester Mercury when I made a field landing during a Hus Bos Comp. Allegedly I was 'desperately seeking somewhere to land', 'swooped low over a farmhouse', and then 'crashed into a field where some local schoolchildren had been playing only the previous day'. Actually it was an out and return task, I had identified the field as being suitable when I got a bit low on the way out, some 30 minutes before I actually landed in it, and did a very copybook circuit and landing. It was a nice big field with no obstructions on the approach, stubble surface, and no animals or children! They also got my name and the make of my glider wrong. The only facts they got right were that I was unhurt and the glider was undamaged! They never spoke to me, only a couple of witnesses and the police who had checked that I was OK. What can you do? Derek Copeland At 15:01 17 June 2009, bildan wrote: On Jun 17, 8:26=A0am, "David Starer" wrote: "Jos=E9 Jim=E9nez" wrote in message ... David Starer wrote: In many other European countries gliding is part of the fabric of everyday life and I would expect reporting there to be better informed and as a result, much more balanced and accurate. A member of my club recently made a perfectly normal, safe outlanding = in a field in Lincolnshire near to a field where a cricket match was in progress. Unfortunately the local rag found out and reported it in the usual sensationalised "Glider Pilot in Shock Horror Death Plunge" kind= of language. Unfortuately, this is the norm rather than the exception even in German= y. For the very least it's titled as an "emergency landing". At least that's a "landing" of some sort; here it's usually reported as a "crash", even when it's blindingly obvious there wasn't one! The only bright spot is that these local rags are rapidly dying for lack of advertising revenue. The screaming headlines and lurid stories are a desperate attempt to hang on to readers for their advertisers as long as possible. Real "news" vanished from their pages long ago - pretty much everyone knows that. The Internet with it's unlimited choice has won. For newspapers, the 'light at the end of the tunnel' is the headlight on a train named Google. I still relish the look on the face of a newspaper marketing guy who knocked on my door with an unfortunate lad in tow trying to get me to take the local paper for "free" when I told him, "No, I don't want to pay the refuse collector to haul it away." If you can't sell "free", you're toast. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would avoid playing fields if possible. They often have been 'levelled'
leaving large steps between levels. I know to my cost! Jim At 22:00 17 June 2009, Peter Wyld wrote: "brave pilot narrowly avoids school" etc. Well, of course s/he would, school buildings are very hard and they will hurt. School playing fields are much more accommodating (with or without soft squishy schoolchildren). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17 June, 18:00, Del C wrote:
They also got my name and the make of my glider wrong. The only facts they got right were that I was unhurt and the glider was undamaged! They never spoke to me, only a couple of witnesses and the police who had checked that I was OK. What can you do? Phone the reporter and invite him/her for a flight? Ian |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I did send an email to the editor of this paper complaining about this
article. I got a reply back from him in which he was very apologetic and explained that he was a glider pilot himself. He was on leave that week and the article was passed by a sub editor. He would have squashed it if he had been there. I believe that a retraction was published a couple of weeks later on an inside page, but the damage had already been done by then. I wasn't in a position to offer the journalist a flight, because I was doing a comp a long way from home and only had a single seat glider. I suppose that from a journalistic point of view, 'glider lands safely in large empty field' (not a school playing field btw) is not very newsworthy. A bit like the famous (London) Times headline 'Small earthquake in Peru, not many killed'! Derek Copeland At 09:06 18 June 2009, Ian wrote: On 17 June, 18:00, Del C wrote: They also got my name and the make of my glider wrong. The only facts they got right were that I was unhurt and the glider was undamaged! They never spoke to me, only a couple of witnesses and the police who had checked that I was OK. What can you do? Phone the reporter and invite him/her for a flight? Ian |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() A member of my club recently made a perfectly normal, safe outlanding in a field in Lincolnshire near to a field where a cricket match was in progress. Unfortunately the local rag found out and reported it in the usual sensationalised "Glider Pilot in Shock Horror Death Plunge" kind of language. Unfortunately, this is the norm rather than the exception even in Germany. For the very least it's titled as an "emergency landing". At least that's a "landing" of some sort; here it's usually reported as a "crash", even when it's blindingly obvious there wasn't one! Even more alarming is the case where you make a perfectly good landing in a field and by the time you have got out of the cockpit to seek a phone (in the days before mobiles), an ambulance, a fire engine, and a police car meet you at the gate. This happened to me twice! I never made it to the news sheets. Alistair Wright |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Accidents | Big John | Piloting | 3 | December 14th 05 01:19 PM |
UK vs USA Glider Accidents | Mike the Strike | Soaring | 5 | November 27th 05 11:13 PM |
Some accidents... (Part 2) | Hilton | Piloting | 8 | January 16th 05 02:43 AM |
Accidents happen... | Manuel | Piloting | 26 | November 28th 04 11:32 AM |
FAA violations and accidents | Doug | Owning | 22 | November 5th 04 01:58 PM |