![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 25, 8:50*am, T8 wrote:
On Jun 24, 10:45*pm, David Prather wrote: I have the same problem-- tremendous "lift" starting at 80 kts. I am trying to share the TE connection with a mechanical Winter vario that works with a capacity flask. Does anyone else share TE between a mechanical vario and the 302? -David Prather David - 302 works best with dedicated TE and static ports. *Excess volumes in the systems (capacity vario, asi, altimiter) play hell with pressure transducer instruments like 302. *TE can be shared, with some loss of performance. *As previously noted, the closer the "tee" is to the probe, the better. *I would suggest test flying with dedicated ports, then work from there to a compromise that works for you. *Pitot may be shared with asi. As far as anomalous "lift" indications in cruise, obvious things to check were covered -- correct connections, no leaks (including probe socket o-rings), correct polar in 302, correct ias showing on 302. Electronic compensation is fraught with difficulties (chiefly that is extremely sensitive to *small* pneumatic errors in both magnitude and timing) and never recommended as a preferred approach. -Evan Ludeman / T8 Edit: "TE can be shared with a capacity type vario, with some loss of performance". But don't put the tee close to the instruments if you do this! All ports may be shared with other pressure transducer type instruments, without loss of performance. Tee location not critical in this case. -T8 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks to all for the help.
The polar was set incorrectly. I really appreciate everything. bob holliday At 03:18 25 June 2009, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Jun 24, 7:45=A0pm, David Prather wrote: I have the same problem-- tremendous "lift" starting at 80 kts. I am trying to share the TE connection with a mechanical Winter vario that works with a capacity flask. Does anyone else share TE between a mechanical vario and the 302? -David Prather At 15:00 22 June 2009, Robert Holliday wrote: My 302 seems to work OK at 60 knots but when i fly 80 knots it indicates 10 knots lift (it is set up for super netto). The total energy is set at 0% as per instructions. It is not set up for electronic compensation. I checked for leaks in the TE probe and tubing and found none. I just had it upgraded to the USB port and the software fixed so it would not "fill up" the flight log storage. Has anyone had this kind of problem? any ideas? thanks. bob holliday Share the TE line? Hopefully not joined close by. One of the leading claims to fame of the C302 is it is a direct reading variometer. It digitally measures pressure and calculates the rate of change, it is not measuring air flow to/from the capacity like with a vane based vario. If you have both on that TE line split the line well away from the instruments so there is some impedance in the line so the flow to the flask does not screw up the C302 entirely. The standard recommendation is to split back behind the seat area and run two lines up to the panel. You can also just put the C302 on the static port (esp. if you have a tripe probe) and use electronic compensation. I know Dave Ellis claimed a good TE probe should be better, but the electronic compensation works great for me. That also provides you some redundancy between a problem in the TE line talking out both varios. Darryl |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: 57mm Cambridge Vario/FS: 80mm Cambridge Vario | ufmechanic | Soaring | 0 | March 24th 09 05:31 PM |
Cambridge 302 & PDA -- Value of adding Cambridge 303? | V1 | Soaring | 5 | July 31st 07 03:51 AM |
Cambridge 302/Cambridge 3UTIQ255 utility/ WinPilot/iPAQ 4155 | Nathan Whelchel | Soaring | 4 | July 5th 04 11:22 PM |
FS Cambridge CAV-II | WDM | Soaring | 2 | March 27th 04 01:55 AM |
Cambridge 302 problem: "Could not get FAT.(A)" while trying to download flight logs | Jason Armistead | Soaring | 5 | July 13th 03 02:36 PM |