![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 1, 2:01*pm, Craig wrote:
On Jul 1, 12:31*pm, "noel.wade" wrote: I agree. But I am especially bothered by accidents that don't seem to fall under any of the above critical points. Ramy Ramy - While its too early to talk about accident causation, in both cases there appears to be some stall/spin behavior in the chain of events. Stall/spin accidents are a known problem and an area that _all_ pilots should be aware of. *There is no excuse for not practicing them and/or taking spin recovery training. Every pilot should understand their CG (and its effects on stall/spin behavior of their particular aircraft). *They should also think about stall/spin behavior and CG changes when they load up on water ballast as well. --Noel Some of our birds are placarded against spinning (my Nimbus 3 included). *Spin training is a must, but something like a Blanik won't necessarily prepare a pilot for a glider with a less benign spin mode. *All of our machines "talk" to us in the air. *The best thing we can do is learn how to really listen to them. Craig After many years of first learning spins, practicing them and finally teaching them, I've developed the opinion that what we do to teach spins has little to do with the actual killer spin. Who would inadvertently haul the nose way up then stomp full rudder at the stall break? The people who taught me the killer spin were my students. As in, "I didn't know a glider would do that." It helps to have a easily spinable glider like a 2-32, Blanik or Lark although the 2-32 tends to spin too easily. These spins require a set up. First, fly at minimum controllable airspeed for at least 30 seconds. Try to let the glider slowly and smoothly enter "mushing flight". In "mushing flight" the glider is not quite stalled but the airflow over the wing has become unstable. Any disturbance will trip it into a full stall. The angle of attack is very high due to the sink rate - not a nose high attitude. In fact, the nose can be near the usual gliding attitude. Any attempt to turn will trip an asymmetric stall which will develop into a spin in less than a second. Just before the glider spins, everything "looks" normal. (Except, of course, for the ridiculously low airspeed, sloppy controls, absence of wind noise etc...) Several high time glider pilots doing a BFR with me didn't see this one coming and were visibly shaken by their 'inadvertent spin'. What happens next is crucial. If the pilot does nothing, the glider is likely to transition into a spiral dive. If the pilot then applies spin recovery control inputs the spiral dive will become much worse. Some of the scariest rides I've had is with a pilot using "anti-spin" control inputs while in a spiral dive. In most fatal "spin-in" accidents, I think the glider is likely to have transitioned to a spiral dive before impact. This can also explain some in-flight breakups following an inadvertent spin. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There has been some insightful, thoughtful, and (I hope)
thought-provoking input ahead of this post & I doubt I can contribute much more, beyond agreeing with it all and trying to reinforce it from my personal perspective. As the years have passed, one by one most of my long-held beliefs about certain aspects of aviation have been proven wrong by reality, e.g.: - it IS possible to spin in a landing-flap-only-equipped sailplane while flying a pattern with full flaps; - people DO routinely fall asleep at the switch; - "it" CAN happen to me. The ship I've flown since 1981 is docility defined in every flight regime which I've explored, and I have difficulty imagining one of similar airfoil & configuration being inadvertently spun...yet it has been done (not by me), and, into the ground, with full flaps deployed (the pilot - who survived - was overshooting his off-airport field). I've never spun mine, have no intention of ever spinning it (intentionally or unintentionally), but believe in my soul that it *might* be possible that I *could* inadvertently spin it...and try really hard to "not do it!" So far, it's worked. I believe and think this way for a number of reasons: 1) accident reports tell me others (including paid professionals) too-often 'do the impossibly unlikely;' 2) perfection's NOT an option; and 3) I hope that by so believing I'm doing everything I can within myself to *avoid* doing those things I never - EVER! - want to do in a glider. You're darned right there's a paradox here, but until someone comes up with an inoculation against human forgetfulness, momentary inattention during critical flight regimes, varying/diminishing skills, etc. I believe it's the best I can do within my own brain. I knew neither of our recently departed soul brothers, but mourn their passing and circumstances, and grieve for their families and friends. Respectfully and Sorrowfully, Bob W. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 1, 5:32*pm, bildan wrote:
What happens next is crucial. *If the pilot does nothing, the glider is likely to transition into a spiral dive. *If the pilot then applies spin recovery control inputs the spiral dive will become much worse. Some of the scariest rides I've had is with a pilot using "anti-spin" control inputs while in a spiral dive. I'm a little confused by this. The normal recovery from a spiral dive is to roll the wings level and then apply smooth aft stick pressure to level flight. What is it about the "anti-spin" control inputs that makes the spiral dive worse? Do you mean something like full rudder in the anti-turn direction and full forward stick? TA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 1, 6:49*pm, Frank wrote:
On Jul 1, 5:32*pm, bildan wrote: What happens next is crucial. *If the pilot does nothing, the glider is likely to transition into a spiral dive. *If the pilot then applies spin recovery control inputs the spiral dive will become much worse. Some of the scariest rides I've had is with a pilot using "anti-spin" control inputs while in a spiral dive. I'm a little confused by this. *The normal recovery from a spiral dive is to roll the wings level and then apply smooth aft stick pressure to level flight. *What is it about the "anti-spin" control inputs that makes the spiral dive worse? *Do you mean something like full rudder in the anti-turn direction and full forward stick? TA You just answered your own question. If in an early spiral dive down elevetor is going to accelerate the spiral dive. If going very fast a full rudder deflection is not a good thing. And you have not directly helped do what you really need to do which is roll off aileron so you can then get the airspeed off. So now you are in a very steep spiral dive maybe yawed sideways and things are winding up fast. If lack of situational awareness led to an inital wrong control input for recovery the confusion about what is then going on may be too much. The g-forces on a pilot in a spiral dive are not pretty to think about. In a ship like mine (ASH-26E) with a nice big bathtub style cockpit getting out would be very difficult. I am not an instructor but one thing I noticed when spinning two seaters with other pilots (and this was just a DG-1000, which is pretty benign) was that it was pretty common not to recognize the transition to a spiral dive. This is the main reason I think proper spin training with an instructor is a good idea. Obviously the goal is to avoid entry at all, but I worry what happens once in a spin if a pilot is not comfortable with recovery. Then think about this with a slippery high performance glider loaded up with water. And. yes I know the horrible irony is that people will die in spin training accidents. Anyhow this is is all gerneal comments and who knows if relevent in any way to the two recent accidents. Deep sympathy to the families of the two pilots who died in these accidents. A sobering time for us all to think about how we fly and out own safety. Darryl |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 1, 2:32*pm, bildan wrote:
Any attempt to turn will trip an asymmetric stall which will develop into a spin in less than a second. * *Just before the glider spins, everything "looks" normal. *(Except, of course, for the ridiculously low airspeed, sloppy controls, absence of wind noise etc...) *Several high time glider pilots doing a BFR with me didn't see this one coming and were visibly shaken by their 'inadvertent spin'. What happens next is crucial. *If the pilot does nothing, the glider is likely to transition into a spiral dive. * I do not understand this last sentence. What converts a spin into a spiral dive? What is the aerdynamic/physics here? Heinz |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 1, 9:54*pm, Heinz wrote:
On Jul 1, 2:32*pm, bildan wrote: Any attempt to turn will trip an asymmetric stall which will develop into a spin in less than a second. * *Just before the glider spins, everything "looks" normal. *(Except, of course, for the ridiculously low airspeed, sloppy controls, absence of wind noise etc...) *Several high time glider pilots doing a BFR with me didn't see this one coming and were visibly shaken by their 'inadvertent spin'. What happens next is crucial. *If the pilot does nothing, the glider is likely to transition into a spiral dive. * I do not understand this last sentence. What converts a spin into a spiral dive? What is the aerdynamic/physics here? Heinz Am I misunderstanding the question? Once the pilot releases back pressure or applies forward stick, or if pilot reduced spin direction rudder or applies opposite rudder (will help slow rotation rate and can cause nose to drop and stall to break) or applies inside aileron (opposite effect of a flat spin)... all obvious things that can cause the stall to break and then you have the outer wing flying faster, nose pointed at ground ... Undoubtedly there are second order things where a glider will come out of a spin by itself (we've all seen this right?) after a few rotations with constant control positions as the nose slowly drops, if the glider is never really fully stalled (esp. with forward CG) or angular momentum related effects. But I'll expect in most cases the cause is just simply the pilot intentionally or unintentionally releasing back pressure. Darryl |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How about some sympathy for the families...
GL At 05:43 02 July 2009, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Jul 1, 9:54=A0pm, Heinz wrote: On Jul 1, 2:32=A0pm, bildan wrote: Any attempt to t= urn will trip an asymmetric stall which will develop into a spin in less than a second. =A0 =A0Just before the glider spins, everything "looks" normal. =A0(Except, of course, for the ridiculously low airspeed, sloppy controls, absence of wind noise etc...) =A0Several high time glider pilots doing a BFR with me didn't see this one coming and were visibly shaken by their 'inadvertent spin'. What happens next is crucial. =A0If the pilot does nothing, the glider is likely to transition into a spiral dive. =A0 I do not understand this last sentence. What converts a spin into a spiral dive? What is the aerdynamic/physics here? Heinz Am I misunderstanding the question? Once the pilot releases back pressure or applies forward stick, or if pilot reduced spin direction rudder or applies opposite rudder (will help slow rotation rate and can cause nose to drop and stall to break) or applies inside aileron (opposite effect of a flat spin)... all obvious things that can cause the stall to break and then you have the outer wing flying faster, nose pointed at ground ... Undoubtedly there are second order things where a glider will come out of a spin by itself (we've all seen this right?) after a few rotations with constant control positions as the nose slowly drops, if the glider is never really fully stalled (esp. with forward CG) or angular momentum related effects. But I'll expect in most cases the cause is just simply the pilot intentionally or unintentionally releasing back pressure. Darryl |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 2, 6:45*am, Gregg Leslie wrote:
How about some sympathy for the families... GL Yes, thank you Gregg. For the rest of you guys... c'mon. You want to discuss elementary spin recovery technique, fine. Start your own thread. Please don't do it in the context of a couple of tragic accidents. We don't know what happened. I do know that the one of these guys I knew personally had a lot more flight experience in all sorts of aircraft, from hang gliders to turbo-twins than most of the noisy pundits here. If he failed to apply appropriate corrective actions, I suspect it is most likely because he was incapacitated. Lack of knowledge or skill wasn't the problem. I'm with Ramy, these accidents are disturbing. -Evan Ludeman / T8 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Points taken, but having said that, how well will pilots react if they
unexpectedly get into a spin or a spiral dive? Normally you gird your loins up first before doing a deliberate spin! It has only happened to me once while solo flying (a spin), and I have to admit that that it took me a second or two to twig what was going on. I have also seen a K6E flown by a very experienced instructor returning to the airfield looking as though it had been on a bombing raid, with lots of torn fabric and other damage after a loss of control in a rough thermal. Derek Copeland At 11:17 02 July 2009, T8 wrote: On Jul 2, 6:45=A0am, Gregg Leslie wrote: How about some sympathy for the families... GL Yes, thank you Gregg. For the rest of you guys... c'mon. You want to discuss elementary spin recovery technique, fine. Start your own thread. Please don't do it in the context of a couple of tragic accidents. We don't know what happened. I do know that the one of these guys I knew personally had a lot more flight experience in all sorts of aircraft, from hang gliders to turbo-twins than most of the noisy pundits here. If he failed to apply appropriate corrective actions, I suspect it is most likely because he was incapacitated. Lack of knowledge or skill wasn't the problem. I'm with Ramy, these accidents are disturbing. -Evan Ludeman / T8 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 2, 5:17*am, T8 wrote:
On Jul 2, 6:45*am, Gregg Leslie wrote: How about some sympathy for the families... GL Yes, thank you Gregg. For the rest of you guys... c'mon. *You want to discuss elementary spin recovery technique, fine. *Start your own thread. *Please don't do it in the context of a couple of tragic accidents. We don't know what happened. *I do know that the one of these guys I knew personally had a lot more flight experience in all sorts of aircraft, from hang gliders to turbo-twins than most of the noisy pundits here. *If he failed to apply appropriate corrective actions, I suspect it is most likely because he was incapacitated. *Lack of knowledge or skill wasn't the problem. I'm with Ramy, these accidents are disturbing. -Evan Ludeman / T8 These accidents are very disturbing for all of us. Of course we sympathize with the families. We are all family. These discussions mean no disrespect whatsoever. We don't yet know the cause of any of these accidents and may never know the exact cause but incapacitation is always a possibility. Discussing the general subject of what causes accidents is one way pilots cope. It's an attempt to put tragedies into some sort of rational framework we can deal with. The biggest mistake we can make as a group is to never discuss accidents since they are a powerful learning opportunity. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fatal crash in NW Washington | Rich S.[_1_] | Home Built | 1 | February 17th 08 02:38 AM |
Fatal Crash | Monty | General Aviation | 1 | December 12th 07 09:06 PM |
Fatal Crash in Fittstown, OK | GeorgeC | Piloting | 3 | March 7th 06 05:03 AM |
Fatal crash at Fuentemillanos | ns51645 | Soaring | 0 | January 24th 04 09:45 AM |
Fatal Crash at Robinson | Steve | Rotorcraft | 5 | November 10th 03 04:27 PM |