![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Oliver wrote:
THIS HAS A MAJOR PROBLEM - specifically inverted flight. The current theory of flight utilizing the Bernoulli's Principal is only applicable to normal level flight. Really? I think you're mistaken. It's also applicable in inverted flight as far as I can see. Orientation of, in this case, an airframe does not change the laws of physics. As long as the airfoil produces lift equal to the mass of the aircraft it'll keep level. didn't you notice that inverted flight with a positive profile requires a higher AOA to counter the 'excess lift' pointed downwards... possible. Thus, the Bernoulli's Principal is no longer applicable to inverted flight, so there must be another theory that supports flight, be it level or inverted. Wow... slow down a bit. Where and how do you come up with a conclusion like this? See my reply above. The new theory of flight is based upon the new theory of Gravitational Vector Force (released Sept 2004). Utilizing Newton's laws that equal opposite force is generated at right angles, I'm not a physics major but... "Newton's laws that equal opposite force is generated at right angles.." is false. How can an opposite force be at right angles? It is "opposite and equal". I think you need to read up on some of your high-school physics books.... You may read more about this new theory at www.threexd.com No thanks... I'll take a backseat on this one. Gravitational Vector Force sounds sexy but I think it's bu****it... ummm... flawed. I'll stick with the Bernoulli's Principal for now. :-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |