![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 28, 8:11*am, " wrote:
On Nov 27, 8:11*pm, wrote: On Nov 26, 9:35 pm, "Morgans" wrote: The idea that a Wankel could run well on jet fuel is an interesting one, but one I have never seen proposed for a full sized Wankel in an airplane, or anywhere else, for that matter. *Are there any case studies of it happening? -- Jim in NC I don't see that happening, either. Kerosene's flame front travels more slowly than gasoline's, as I understand it; about half the speed even at the high compression pressures in turbines. When a gas-eating auto gets diesel instead of gas, it gives up real quick. Produces little power and gets real hot. The compression ratio is far too low. [...] You have it all "Bassakwards"! Kerosene (Diesel-1 & jet fuel JP-4,5) & pump Diesel #2 once heated close to their flash points have a far faster burn/meter rate than gasoline, propane, butane, LNG or Alcohol (either Methanol or Ethanol). These fuels are all rated for combustion stability & rather slow burning/liter or Octane rating whereas Kerosene & Diesel fuels are rated for unstable spontaneous combustion or CETANE rating 40. This makes a slow, poor burning combustion chamber as in the Mazda Wankel's at =9.0:1 CR a nice solution for those flaming exhaust pops and such. What happens is that once up to say 180 degree F Kerosene or JP-5 will burn very quickly and not have such a high EGT in a non-turbocharged Wankel engine. One might surmise that pinging will result & melt down the engine but if you go back in time even low compression tractor engines (way back before Diesel tractors were common place) used a system of gasoline warm-up then switched to cheaper and more available during wartime KEROSENE without ruining their engines under heavy loading and advanced timing. Wankel's surely must have a good cooling system but the stock one on the 100HP versions should be more than adequate. BTW, the reason most uneducated in the field feel that Diesel engines burn more slowly is than their combustion cycle is not a "one shot" affair as in a spark ignited engine but rather either a pulse (common rail injection) or in older Diesels the injection continues like a blow torch in a a lean air mixture or non-stoichiometric but rather a "stratified" like a torch effect that continues to burn far after TDC. Now if you need a refresher in chemistry and physics or whatever then go for it but please don't spout out fear based ideas you have for no conception about. Thanks. Bob Nixon.. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
failure of an auto engine | Steve Hix[_2_] | Piloting | 0 | November 26th 09 12:05 AM |
A Simple Auto Engine Conversion | [email protected] | Home Built | 2 | August 28th 08 01:06 PM |
A Simple Auto Engine Conversion | [email protected] | Home Built | 0 | August 28th 08 03:24 AM |
Auto Engine Conversion Video | stol | Home Built | 24 | May 4th 08 05:13 AM |
Auto engine bolt patterns | Ron Webb | Home Built | 12 | October 20th 04 01:35 PM |