A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Czechoslovak nuclear weapons? Warszaw Pact War Plans ( The Effects of a Global Thermonuclear War ...)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 16th 04, 05:03 AM
B2431
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Plans ( The Effects of a Global Thermonuclear War


He is talking apparently about the nuclear material in the core only being
somewhere around 11-13 kg (it is going to take more than 2 to 4 kilograms of
HE, Be, triggers, etc to handle the rest of the equation); in that same
article he refers to the W-54 as being the smallest practical sherical
device ever fielded, and then also describes the linear implosion devices
(which are narrower, but also longer) used in arty rounds. None of the
fielded weapons ever got below around 100 pounds or so.

Brooks

Linear implosion? How would that work?

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired
  #2  
Old January 16th 04, 06:42 AM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"B2431" wrote in message
...
Plans ( The Effects of a Global Thermonuclear War


He is talking apparently about the nuclear material in the core only

being
somewhere around 11-13 kg (it is going to take more than 2 to 4 kilograms

of
HE, Be, triggers, etc to handle the rest of the equation); in that same
article he refers to the W-54 as being the smallest practical sherical
device ever fielded, and then also describes the linear implosion devices
(which are narrower, but also longer) used in arty rounds. None of the
fielded weapons ever got below around 100 pounds or so.

Brooks

Linear implosion? How would that work?


Instead of compressing a sphere, imagine a football shaped pit surrounded by
explosive material, with detonation initiated at each end--the detonation
wavefront progresses inward from each end (the wavefront is actually
"shaped" by inserting plates of a somewhat lesser diameter than that of the
HE charge into the HE in front of the initiators so that the wavefront
propogates radially first to get around the plate, then inwards from the
explosive outside the plate perimeter) and compresses the "football" into a
sphere. This allows you to design a weapon with a smaller diameter (but a
greater length) than if it used normal spherical implosion. The other
method of reducing diameter is use of a gun-type device, but IIRC Pu does
not work in gun designs. The Nuclear Weapons Archive has a better
description if you are interested (
http://gawain.membrane.com/hew/News/...ukesExist.html ).

Brooks


Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Warszaw Pact War Plans ( The Effects of a Global Thermonuclear War ...) Keith Willshaw Military Aviation 2 December 10th 03 08:05 AM
Warszaw Pact War Plans ( The Effects of a Global Thermonuclear War ...) Matt Wiser Military Aviation 0 December 7th 03 08:20 PM
please stop bashing France Grantland Military Aviation 233 October 29th 03 01:23 AM
What about the AIM-54 Pheonix Missile? Flub Military Aviation 26 October 5th 03 05:34 AM
Laser simulator provides weapons training Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 August 28th 03 09:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.