![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 26, 12:44*pm, JS wrote:
ABSOLUTELY NOT! * NEVER replace any "good old days" Operating Limitations. The new ones (or more likely tens) will create vast sucking sounds. They are designed to keep you well grounded. Jim true in most cases, especially with non amatuer built gliders that require a program letter and stuff. however on my experimental-amatuer built Cherokee II I was actually able to gain more flexibilty in terms of required instrumentation by getting new operating limitations issued last spring. everything else was the same except the very friendly folks at the Wichita FSDO issued them using the standard wording that all experimental amatuer built aircraft should get, that is there are no instrument requirements as long as you are flying Day VFR. The last guy had given it operating limitations which restrained it to the 91.209 (I think) AIRPLANE instrument requirements. But based on what I've seen on RAS and what I've heard I bet I'm about the only glider guy in the country who has called the FSDO asking them to give me new operating limitations. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You'd lose that bet, Tony - I'm another glider guy who called his FSDO
asking them to give him new operating limits. My op limits were dated June 2002, and specified a home base airport. Had I stuck with these op limits, I would have had a 3,000 mile (one way) drive to fly my glider for proficiency! Surprisingly, the new op limits are more permissive than the old op limits. If I wanted, I could install appropriate instruments and fly IFR now, whereas the old limits were for VFR flight only. I am also now allowed to carry passengers, as long as it's not for hire. Neither are of interest (or practical, for that matter), but it just goes to show that new op limits are not always bad. -John Tony wrote: true in most cases, especially with non amatuer built gliders that require a program letter and stuff. however on my experimental-amatuer built Cherokee II I was actually able to gain more flexibilty in terms of required instrumentation by getting new operating limitations issued last spring. everything else was the same except the very friendly folks at the Wichita FSDO issued them using the standard wording that all experimental amatuer built aircraft should get, that is there are no instrument requirements as long as you are flying Day VFR. The last guy had given it operating limitations which restrained it to the 91.209 (I think) AIRPLANE instrument requirements. But based on what I've seen on RAS and what I've heard I bet I'm about the only glider guy in the country who has called the FSDO asking them to give me new operating limitations. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 26, 3:16*pm, jcarlyle wrote:
You'd lose that bet, Tony - I'm another glider guy who called his FSDO asking them to give him new operating limits. My op limits were dated June 2002, and specified a home base airport. Had I stuck with these op limits, I would have had a 3,000 mile (one way) drive to fly my glider for proficiency! Surprisingly, the new op limits are more permissive than the old op limits. If I wanted, I could install appropriate instruments and fly IFR now, whereas the old limits were for VFR flight only. I am also now allowed to carry passengers, as long as it's not for hire. Neither are of interest (or practical, for that matter), but it just goes to show that new op limits are not always bad. -John Tony wrote: true in most cases, especially with non amatuer built gliders that require a program letter and stuff. however on my experimental-amatuer built Cherokee II I was actually able to gain more flexibilty in terms of required instrumentation by getting new operating limitations issued last spring. *everything else was the same except the very friendly folks at the Wichita FSDO issued them using the standard wording that all experimental amatuer built aircraft should get, that is there are no instrument requirements as long as you are flying Day VFR. *The last guy had given it operating limitations which restrained it to the 91.209 (I think) AIRPLANE instrument requirements. But based on what I've seen on RAS and what I've heard I bet I'm about the only glider guy in the country who has called the FSDO asking them to give me new operating limitations.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - was that 'home base' for any flight or just Phase I flight testing? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Both Phase I flight testing and all subsequent proficiency flights had
to be within 300 nm of the home base airport. You could fly without geographic restriction at specific events, provided you identified where and when in the annual program letter or in a fax to the FSDO. -John Tony wrote: was that 'home base' for any flight or just Phase I flight testing? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A lot of the Ops Limits issued since that magical date that required annual
program letters also had geographical limitations. So if you bought such a glider and moved it across the country, a new Ops Limitation letter would be requried. BT "jcarlyle" wrote in message ... Both Phase I flight testing and all subsequent proficiency flights had to be within 300 nm of the home base airport. You could fly without geographic restriction at specific events, provided you identified where and when in the annual program letter or in a fax to the FSDO. -John Tony wrote: was that 'home base' for any flight or just Phase I flight testing? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gyrocopter requirements and limitations | Andy L | Piloting | 1 | October 28th 08 04:25 PM |
Registering a Warbird with the FAA (Experimental Operating Limitations) | [email protected] | Owning | 21 | October 11th 05 01:52 AM |
changing operating limitations | pittss1c | Home Built | 46 | August 22nd 05 04:28 AM |
Limitations of Lemon Pledge | Jay Honeck | Owning | 36 | May 6th 04 08:44 PM |
regs re flying outside the limitations of a plane...? | Ron Natalie | Piloting | 0 | July 9th 03 04:12 PM |