![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 29, 11:22*am, "noel.wade" wrote:
The big catch with those cheapie units you guys are posting links to is their low screen resolution. *Only ~270 or ~240 lines of pixels? *:- P All the IPAQ 3600/3800/3900 most of us have been flying with for years have the same screen res. 470/240 is not a problem in fact it makes the screen refreshes faster than units with higher res. but same speed processors. (they also have small battery capacities from what I can tell) Thats why you wire them into the ships power like a regular IPAQ solution. Since none of these "roll your own" systems are going to be IGC-legal for badges/records, why not simply use an IGC-legal external computer/ logger with its own GPS (a la the ewMicroRecorder or similar)? Most flights flown can use the software generated IGC files to post to OLC which is what 99% of flights are. If you want to get badges or records then you will have a full IGC logger in your possession anyway Ditching the GPS component from the PDA/PNA means a simpler device with a much lower power consumption level. *Seems to me that there are a lot of non-graphical (but IGC-legal) loggers and flight computers out there, and most work fine. *Its the moving-map/navigation aspect that needs work - so why not concentrate on that? The integrated GPS uses a lot less current than an separate device. Have you even seen the latest versions of XCSOAR? And If your GPS fails, you _do_ have charts in your plane... don't you?? Charts LOL of course and they are all up to date as well. Regards Al |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 29, 11:22*am, "noel.wade" wrote:
The big catch with those cheapie units you guys are posting links to is their low screen resolution. *Only ~270 or ~240 lines of pixels? *:- P All the IPAQ 3600/3800/3900 most of us have been flying with for years have the same screen res. 470/240 is not a problem in fact it makes the screen refreshes faster than units with higher res. but same speed processors. (they also have small battery capacities from what I can tell) Thats why you wire them into the ships power like a regular IPAQ solution. Since none of these "roll your own" systems are going to be IGC-legal for badges/records, why not simply use an IGC-legal external computer/ logger with its own GPS (a la the ewMicroRecorder or similar)? Most flights flown can use the software generated IGC files to post to OLC which is what 99% of flights are. If you want to get badges or records then you will have a full IGC logger in your possession anyway Ditching the GPS component from the PDA/PNA means a simpler device with a much lower power consumption level. *Seems to me that there are a lot of non-graphical (but IGC-legal) loggers and flight computers out there, and most work fine. *Its the moving-map/navigation aspect that needs work - so why not concentrate on that? The integrated GPS uses a lot less current than an separate device. Have you even seen the latest versions of XCSOAR? And If your GPS fails, you _do_ have charts in your plane... don't you?? Charts LOL of course and they are all up to date as well. Regards Al |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Couple of clarifications (not that I don't appreciate the humor and
consider this a "light-hearted" topic... 1) Yes, I'm a huge user of XCSoar - I even put together a short video tutorial, which is on the XCSoar site. Someday I'll finish the other videos in the series that I intended to make... 2) What I was trying to say was that most people _already_ have a GPS in their cockpit somewhere. Buying a PNA or other device with its _own_ GPS means having extra current draw/power-demand. I don't care if its the internal battery or ship's power - duplicating functions like that is wasting usable electrons, period. ;-P --Noel |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 27, 12:29*pm, Sandy Stevenson wrote:
On Jan 27, 12:10*pm, Mario wrote: http://www.macworld.com/article/1458...ent.html?lsrc=.... Now if only SeeYou, flyWithCE, Glide Navigator II, or someone (Dave) would make an app for this. At 9.71 inches, this device seems a bit large for a glider cockpit. No problem with a 10 inch display - as long as it's thin and light. Make a mount with a hinge at the top so it can be flipped up. Put a full glass cockpit/glide computer display on it. If it fails, flip it up to reveal the old "steam gauges" underneath. Take it out for the annual. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 1, 3:45*pm, bildan wrote:
On Jan 27, 12:29*pm, Sandy Stevenson wrote: On Jan 27, 12:10*pm, Mario wrote: http://www.macworld.com/article/1458...ent.html?lsrc=... Now if only SeeYou, flyWithCE, Glide Navigator II, or someone (Dave) would make an app for this. At 9.71 inches, this device seems a bit large for a glider cockpit. No problem with a 10 inch display - as long as it's thin and light. Make a mount with a hinge at the top so it can be flipped up. *Put a full glass cockpit/glide computer display on it. *If it fails, flip it up to reveal the old "steam gauges" underneath. *Take it out for the annual. There was a PW5 pilot that had that with a monster hang glider instrument on top of this regular instruments. I preffer the mix of steam and high tech. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 1, 9:58*pm, "
wrote: On Feb 1, 3:45*pm, bildan wrote: On Jan 27, 12:29*pm, Sandy Stevenson wrote: On Jan 27, 12:10*pm, Mario wrote: http://www.macworld.com/article/1458...ent.html?lsrc=... Now if only SeeYou, flyWithCE, Glide Navigator II, or someone (Dave) would make an app for this. At 9.71 inches, this device seems a bit large for a glider cockpit. No problem with a 10 inch display - as long as it's thin and light. Make a mount with a hinge at the top so it can be flipped up. *Put a full glass cockpit/glide computer display on it. *If it fails, flip it up to reveal the old "steam gauges" underneath. *Take it out for the annual. There was a PW5 pilot that had that with a monster hang glider instrument on top of this regular instruments. I preffer the mix of steam and high tech. Al, I always suspected you were into "Steam Punk". |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 2, 7:05*am, bildan wrote:
On Feb 1, 9:58*pm, " wrote: On Feb 1, 3:45*pm, bildan wrote: On Jan 27, 12:29*pm, Sandy Stevenson wrote: On Jan 27, 12:10*pm, Mario wrote: http://www.macworld.com/article/1458...ent.html?lsrc=... Now if only SeeYou, flyWithCE, Glide Navigator II, or someone (Dave) would make an app for this. At 9.71 inches, this device seems a bit large for a glider cockpit. No problem with a 10 inch display - as long as it's thin and light. Make a mount with a hinge at the top so it can be flipped up. *Put a full glass cockpit/glide computer display on it. *If it fails, flip it up to reveal the old "steam gauges" underneath. *Take it out for the annual. There was a PW5 pilot that had that with a monster hang glider instrument on top of this regular instruments. I preffer the mix of steam and high tech. Al, I always suspected you were into "Steam Punk". Hey I have even been know to fly a PW5 once!! That was enough... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|