![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 4, 12:30*pm, DonMorrisey wrote:
Howdy, Where would I find these "blister fairings"??... You make them, using any of a wide variety of tools, materials, and methods. My favorite method for small blisters is to constrain a nylon or Visqueen membrane using double-sided tape and whatever else is handy, inflate it with a few PSI of air, and lay up a few plies of fiberglass over the resulting bulge. Fill to shape, file to fit, sand smooth, and paint to hide. ...Although I have a feeling the interference is too significant to cure with those. *Just giving it the eyeball test both lower left and right sides would have to be cut from the nosebowl and somehow a boxier shape created... Are we just talking about just the fiberglass MC-3 nosebowl here, or are we talking about the nosebowl and lower cowl? I am hard-pressed to see how any exhaust on an O-235 would get very far outside the envelope of just the MC-3 bowl. I suspect that what you might mean is that the exhaust system gets outside the envelope of a lower cowl that would be formed by a ruled surface extended between the lower half of the MC-3 nosebowl and the firewall. Is that it, or am I off-base on that guess? Looking at this picture of your engine, I can see that the PowerFlow system is indeed a pretty tall exhaust system: http://www.donsbushcaddy.com/sitebui...ingO235L2C.jpg That's one of the reasons I was never a particular fan of the PowerFlow. Their installations seems sort of clunky, and they have that huge muffler hanging way out in the breeze. I'm far more partial to the Vetterman systems common on the RV-series airplanes: http://vettermanexhaust.com/ Thanks, Bob K. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I suspect that what you might mean is that the exhaust system gets outside the envelope of a lower cowl that would be formed by a ruled surface extended between the lower half of the MC-3 nosebowl and the firewall. Is that it, or am I off-base on that guess? Bob, The quote above is exactly the problem, hence the need for a more rectangular nosebowl. So what I'm really after is direction on where I may find a nosebowl that isn't crescent shaped on the bottom??? Thanks. Don... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 4, 5:02*pm, DonMorrisey wrote:
So what I'm really after is direction on where I may find a nosebowl that isn't crescent shaped on the bottom??? Ah, right. I'd start by looking at other airplanes that use that particular model of exhaust system, and see what they use for a cowling. It might be that the nose bowl of a PA-28 would fit, I seem to recall it as pretty tall. If something like that doesn't work, you will probably end up making an entire cowling, including nosebowl, from scratch or nearly so. Well, that's not actually what I'd do. I'd probably flog that exhaust system on eBay and go with a different system that fits into a tighter cowl. I just don't see the point in adding so extra frontal area and volume to the cowling for an exhaust system with little if any benefit over other systems available for experimental airplanes. But that's just me. Thanks again, Bob K. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
U shaped wings | Hul Tytus | Home Built | 15 | January 8th 10 09:46 AM |
Triangle shaped ice/frost on the wing - anyone seen this? | Nathan Young | Piloting | 9 | December 7th 05 10:15 PM |