![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 11, 3:20*am, Rufus wrote:
basilisk wrote: "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote in message .3.70... "basilisk" fired this volley in news:J4Nln.198564 : you will have to provide a slave cylinder or roots type blower to move the air. Some variants use a cylinder skirt with reed valving. LLoyd You're right, *I didn't really consider that before posting. I supposed it could be worked out but that looks hard to do in a completely bottom assembled engine, just my 2 cents worth, I'm not an engine specialist. basilisk Try modifying an existing engine...and don't go hard over on it being a 2-stroke. *I've often thought of trying to construct a full 9 or 7 cylinder aircraft radial using Harley engine parts - hell, those engines have more in common with an air cooled radial than about anything I can think of other than a Pratt & Whitney. SNIP -- * * * - Rufus Worth noting: there is a radial project out there with quite a few builders that uses VW jugs and a custom crankcase and heads. Around 100hp if I remember correctly. There are also a couple of half VW engine projects with plans available. If you take a stroll around the national air and space museum you will get a feel for the art that went into many of the early engines. The old designers and machinists were a different breed, and their work inspires awe in any mechanically inclined mind. It is worth noting that many of the older radial and fan engine configurations used a pie- wedge style crankcase, where the cylinder and the case were a single piece, and the crankcase bolted together in pieces arranged in circumference to the crankshaft. With modern alloys and machining techniques, I've wondered if returning to this style might be tolerable for a small engine today. Lawn mowers are done similarly, and so I'd imagine an engine designed in this fashion would scale up quickly from a production standpoint. While building a new engine solely for art is a lofty goal, I can't really see it for any other reason. What performance specs could you be looking for that aren't currently available in a production engine, or are not otherwise achievable by making minor modifications to a production engine? The engine of interest to me lately is the new subaru TDI boxer motor. Wow that thing is fancy, and I'm hoping it makes its way to the states some time soon. With modern boosting techniques I'd also like to see the packard aero diesel configuration revisited, perhaps integrating some of the features in the elsbett engines. . If I was heading off in the scratch built direction, I would outsource the casting process. There are many shops domestic and overseas that can do short runs of castings based on a provided dxf file. It is unlikely that a backyard foundry will ever get close to the level of detail these shops can create. I would probably search far and wide before starting to CAD the thing up. Of course, thinking down the road, if ever I should build my own bird, I'm thinking Rotec, or PZL Franklin. I'd like to go heavy kung fu into engine design, but it is just way to much work, for way to little optimization. Thanks! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DIY Two-Stroke Engine | durabol[_2_] | Home Built | 55 | April 5th 10 05:11 PM |
Methods for altitude changes | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 141 | April 18th 07 12:48 AM |
Small 4 stroke engine? | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 35 | July 2nd 05 07:25 PM |
BSFC vs gas mileage, 2 stroke vs 4 stroke | Jay | Home Built | 10 | August 24th 04 02:26 PM |
engine construction blueprints | Håken | Military Aviation | 0 | April 27th 04 05:23 PM |