A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

ASH-25E + Rotax 275



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 19th 10, 04:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
cernauta
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 121
Default ASH-25E + Rotax 275

On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:07:25 +0200, Willy VINKEN
wrote:

Fine, Aldo.
I tried to work it out with the angles, but I don't have the precise
reductor ratio.
Say we have a 3:1 reduction:


that's correct, at least on the 600. I'm pretty sure it's the same for
the 25.

the full compression (TDC) will be
encountered only once every 3 revolutions, right?


3 rev of the engine, 1 rev of the propeller.

I guess the TDC+~15° reference is chosen because it's easier to feel
than near BDC.


correct. At or near TDC, you feel the compression as you move the
propeller by hand.

Which means the propeller would stop after another 180°, when the
piston is at BDC+~15°, and compression starts to build up.


I'm not following you in this.
The propeller will stop (or, slow down to almost a stop) at the
beginning of a compression cycle. That has a 1 out of 3 chance of
being the desired, near vertical position.

It's difficult for me to rely on the assumption that the propeller
will always stop turning near (enough) this precise position.
Does yours?


1 of the 3 positions. Then you just wait for it to pass along the
wrong compression zone(s), and as it approaches the one very close to
vertical, you must be ready to pull firmly on the propeller brake.
I guess you have a rear view mirror.

Also, it should be hazardous to check it on the ground, because
there's no relative wind...


On the ground, you just need to move the prop by hand, and make sure
one blade (in my case, the one related to the magnetic proximity
sensor) hits compression about 10-20 cm before vertical (measured at
the tip).
The proximity sensor gives "consensus" to the electric retraction
system, provided the main switch is in "normal operation mode". In
Manual mode, I can retract the engine in whichever prop position
(accepting high risk of damage to the prop and the engine-bay lids)

And if my above assumption is correct, I guess the brake's only task
is to prevent the low compression to turn back the propeller when it
is lowered out of wind pressure?


The brake prevents the propeller to move, though slowly, due to the
relative wind. Without the brake, at 90 km/h, the prop will win over
the compression in a few seconds.

Aldo




Willy


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
rotax engine [email protected] Piloting 1 January 6th 07 07:09 PM
For Morgans ...Rotax (x 2) Montblack Home Built 12 April 28th 06 07:19 AM
Rotax vs. Jabiru Cal Vanize Home Built 30 January 23rd 06 08:15 PM
80 hp Rotax Falke as Tug [email protected] Soaring 4 December 28th 05 10:08 AM
Ellison TBI and ROTAX 582 Bill Elliott Aerobatics 0 December 22nd 03 05:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.