![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
I pointed at the structural distortion at the point
of the fire and could visualize the coming event with clarity. Don't be so sure, Gordon. snip to save space I have seen dozens of controlled collapse events and the preparation involved includes thousands of pre-drilled holes, VERY evident purposeful weakening of every single support, etc. Primacord everywhere, obvious preparation work that often takes weeks. These buildings were struck down by TWO gigantic "bombs" - namely airliners. As for Keith's comment, I believe that people in the anti-terror business thought hijacking airliners was a possible terror event, but prior to 9/11, most of the terror experts were viewed as alarmists and not given much attention. When Billy Mitchell told the Navy and the rest of America that Japan would someday destroy our fleet at Pearl Harbor, using air-dropped torpedoes, America collectively shook its head, 'no, even though its not mathematically impossible, its just not going to happen'. We were proven massively wrong. So even though kamikaze attacks were a known possibility, most Americans ranked that possibility somewhere around the same chance that Romulans would land. Is it true that the contract to clean up the site was awarded to a Controlled demolitions Inc. company or a company with a name like that? That company has one of the most solidly professional reputations in our country. What you are suggesting is that they are also mass murderers, capable of maintaining a secret plan to murder thousands of other Americans, for years before and after the event. With Romulan cloaking technology, their efforts to mine the building could well have been successful. _Thousands_ of maintenance people worked in those buidlings and no one ever suggested a hint of a problem, such as the discovery of weakened supports or any other preparation for demolition. If I worked for that company, I would be outraged at such a baseless allegation that they were responsible, when we watched the airliner slam directly into the building. I know you hate conspiracy theories but here is one for your consideration. Actually, I enjoy a good conspiracy theory - what I detest are baseless ones that fall apart under the microscope. Also, any conspiracy that involves entire ship crews, or thousands of participants, because basically human beings cannot keep a secret of that magnitude. That is a fact. Kennedy assassination, stuff like that - of course, not only possible, but probable. I know a lot of expert shots and if LHO managed two out of three direct hits on a 3-d moving target at that range, well, he ranks as the best shot in history. So its not conspiracies that bug me - its those theories that ignore the obvious and depend on the incredible that I can't stand. These are case know to the public, I mean that part of it that is my humble self. I do believe in conspiracy theories, at any rate some of them So do I, just not the ones that require the secrecy of thousands to succeed. So Keith seems to be mistaken here. A suicidal attack could be real and it was not unknown to those who knew the situation. Agreed on this point. if different parts of the frame got damaged to different degrees due to asymmetric impact or uneven fire spreading then... the tower or its parts could fall ASIDE, onto a much wider area and with much greater damage. These were HIGH towers after all. I disagree - we've both seen demolitions where buildings collapsed into themselves. Once the top floors accordion downwards, inertia takes over, speeding the process. After the events take place it's a 'well done, nice job' situation. Guys here is your contract. You'll do the cleaning job clean, won't you? Some things should remain hidden from the public and these crazy conspiracy theorists. "Guys, here is your contract to murder thousands of Americans. Make sure you keep the secret for years." Only takes one guy with a conscience, or one too many beers, and all of this murderous preparation goes up in smoke. Share the secret with your wife, get divorced and end up on the 11 O'clock news. Such a secret could be kept by one person, perhaps. Dozens? Hundreds? because you would have to include everyone that might stumble over the evidence. Then, you have to convince every building inspector and fire marshall to ignore the weakened beams and all the other preparations. i.e., its not going to work. Incredible? I dont' know. Also I don't know who was to make such decisions in the USA and NYC if there was (were)such (a)person(s). Thousands of Americans, all agreeing to participate in the most monsterous single-event case of murder in history. How much you must hate us... snip slander against Controlled Demolition Inc. They are damn experienced, that's their job they've been doing for years. False of course - for years, these professionals have been making huge structures collapse, by using cranes, bulldozers, and hundreds of people, working in the open as they selectively weaken the structures at hundreds of different points, while making every effort to not endanger a single human life. Aren't you grasping the phone receiver yet, to call the guys? Why wouldn't I apply Occam's Razor first? Gigantic airliners exploded within the towers and eventually brought them down. I witnessed this as it occurred. What I did not see was any evidence of what you suggest - no ripple fired demo charges, no dozens of support columns being blown out of the way, in short, nothing to suggest a controlled demolition occuring within an hour of hijacked aircraft impacting the structures. For this theory of yours to work, every person at that company would have to agree to keep one hell of an ugly secret, forever. The people that ordered this act, and their families, would also have to carry the secret around every day of their lives. Building inspectors, fire marshalls, all would have to understand why they needed to participate, and agree to do so, forever. "Two people can keep a secret if one is dead." How about hundreds of people? _No one_ wants the millions of dollars and publicity that would come from being the loudest whistle blower in history? Come now. v/r Gordon |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: 1996 "Aircraft Of The World: A Complete Guide" Binder Sheet Singles | J.R. Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | July 14th 04 08:34 AM |
| Complete Reversal or Not? | Greg Esres | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | February 12th 04 11:05 AM |