A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Glider accident near Altoona... interview with pilot



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4  
Old May 15th 10, 11:43 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
John Godfrey (QT)[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 321
Default Glider accident near Altoona... interview with pilot

On May 14, 11:51*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On May 14, 4:28*pm, ContestID67 wrote:

What seems really strange is the the rescurers didn't have a simple,
inexpensive, GPS so that they could zero in on the pilot quickly. *The
narrative indicates that the pilot had to guide them in via sound.
Even cell phones now have GPS. *This should be required equipment.


1. Did the PLB have a GPS?
2. Did the PLB have a GPS fix?

Foliage or other *could mean a PLB with GPS is unable to get a fix.
That or if the PLB does not have a GPS then then SARSAT relies on
(significantly less precise) doppler location. It is also at least
plausible that an alert process can be started before a triangulation
fix established.

If the ground SAR crew had 121.1 direction finder that may also have
helped triangulate on the PLB 121.5 Mhz beacon (all 406 Mhz ELTs and
PLBs also have 121.5 Mhz homing beacons), but with heavy foliage/steep
terrain that may have been more work/slower than the airhorns.

Darryl


Les’s comments in the AOPA web article are consistent with the
experiences with both the Peter Masak and Dale Kramer searches.
Although very high quality information (e.g. coordinates, elt signal,
knowledge of route being flown) may be available, there is a gap in
the ability of local non-aviation rescue (and even CAP) to accept and/
or use it effectively. Had Les not been able to respond to the sounds
made by the rescue team over his cellphone, it would have probably
taken much longer to find him as there is no indication that his
coordinates were either communicated to the rescue team or that they
had the capability to use them. However, I do not know whether SARSAT
actually got GPS coordinates from his PLB or they just estimated
coordinates from the PLB signal (a 406 Mhz elt signal without GPS
determines a search area of about 2 miles radius).

This reinforces the advantages of having something with you that makes
noise (elt, whistle, bike horn etc.) that is either automatically
activated or on the front of your chute.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Glider accident in France claims two zurchman Soaring 1 July 9th 09 01:53 AM
Reno Newspaper Defends Reporting on Glider Accident SoarPoint Soaring 15 September 1st 06 07:49 AM
Glider accident near San Antonio Duster Soaring 0 June 26th 06 08:43 PM
TV Interview With Pilot From ADIZ Incident Jay Beckman Piloting 64 May 27th 05 11:38 AM
Interview of Finnish Curtiss Hawk 75 pilot Jarl Arnkil Jukka O. Kauppinen Military Aviation 0 January 31st 04 05:42 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.