![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 14, 11:51*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On May 14, 4:28*pm, ContestID67 wrote: What seems really strange is the the rescurers didn't have a simple, inexpensive, GPS so that they could zero in on the pilot quickly. *The narrative indicates that the pilot had to guide them in via sound. Even cell phones now have GPS. *This should be required equipment. 1. Did the PLB have a GPS? 2. Did the PLB have a GPS fix? Foliage or other *could mean a PLB with GPS is unable to get a fix. That or if the PLB does not have a GPS then then SARSAT relies on (significantly less precise) doppler location. It is also at least plausible that an alert process can be started before a triangulation fix established. If the ground SAR crew had 121.1 direction finder that may also have helped triangulate on the PLB 121.5 Mhz beacon (all 406 Mhz ELTs and PLBs also have 121.5 Mhz homing beacons), but with heavy foliage/steep terrain that may have been more work/slower than the airhorns. Darryl Les’s comments in the AOPA web article are consistent with the experiences with both the Peter Masak and Dale Kramer searches. Although very high quality information (e.g. coordinates, elt signal, knowledge of route being flown) may be available, there is a gap in the ability of local non-aviation rescue (and even CAP) to accept and/ or use it effectively. Had Les not been able to respond to the sounds made by the rescue team over his cellphone, it would have probably taken much longer to find him as there is no indication that his coordinates were either communicated to the rescue team or that they had the capability to use them. However, I do not know whether SARSAT actually got GPS coordinates from his PLB or they just estimated coordinates from the PLB signal (a 406 Mhz elt signal without GPS determines a search area of about 2 miles radius). This reinforces the advantages of having something with you that makes noise (elt, whistle, bike horn etc.) that is either automatically activated or on the front of your chute. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Glider accident in France claims two | zurchman | Soaring | 1 | July 9th 09 01:53 AM |
Reno Newspaper Defends Reporting on Glider Accident | SoarPoint | Soaring | 15 | September 1st 06 07:49 AM |
Glider accident near San Antonio | Duster | Soaring | 0 | June 26th 06 08:43 PM |
TV Interview With Pilot From ADIZ Incident | Jay Beckman | Piloting | 64 | May 27th 05 11:38 AM |
Interview of Finnish Curtiss Hawk 75 pilot Jarl Arnkil | Jukka O. Kauppinen | Military Aviation | 0 | January 31st 04 05:42 PM |