![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rolf,
From the inception of the club to about 5 years ago, we flew and taught AGL only. No self respecting power pilot would fly AGL. Flying AGL is a crutch intended to help new pilots. But It is better to learn it right from the get-go than to have to relearn it later and maybe getting into an accident. So about 5 years ago my Club's flight chair said that flying AGL was wrong, dangerous and (if I am not mistaken) illegal. So the board made an edict and we changed overnight at the start of a season. We marked all altimeters in club ships "MSL Only Club Policy". There was some, but not a tremendous amount of, consternation ... such as "But it is so flat around here." or "But I always land back home." We did have one incident related to the AGL/MSL switch that might be a good to read about. One day yours truly flew a club ship and set the altimeter to MSL. The next pilot was an die hard AGL'er. The AGL'ers were used to finding the altimer not quite at zero due to barometric changes and would "tweak" the altimeter to zero at the start of each flight. Our field elevation is 888 feet. So the next pilot tweaks the altimeter to "zero" but instead of subtracting 888 feet (by moving the hands CCW), he tweaks it CW and adds 112 feet! Can you see where this is going? He then takes a tow to what he thinks is 3,000 feet AGL but is only really at 2,000 feet AGL. The tow pilot doesn't think much about it as people get off tow early all the time. About to enter the pattern the AGL'er thinks, "Gee, the ground seems to be kind of large today ... but I am still at 1500 feet AGL so I'm must be OK." He then almost lands short as he was 1,000 feet lower than he thought. End of story? Nah. The AGL'er gets back on the ground and complains that the altimeter must be wrong. We look at the altimer and see that it is showing 1,000 feet. Putting 2+2 together we figured out what he did. So get this ... an old timer CFIG says it was my fault as I should have reset the altimeter to zero when I got out. Sorry, wrong-o. Who was the PIC on the second flight? The AGL'er of course. It is his responsibility to ensure that the instrumentation is set correctly, not mine. Can you tell that it still grates a bit? Ok, I feel better now. Anyway, my suggestions are to; 1) Do it! 2) Convert "big bang" all at once, not by dribs and drabs or over a "transition" period. 3) Mark the altimeter with an "MSL Only" sign to reenforce the new policy each time a pilot climbs into the cockpit. Good luck, John DeRosa PS Early in my soaring career, I remember flying at a commercial operation while on a business trip and was told to set the altimeter to MSL. I started sweating worrying about all the math I would need to calculate in my head. Luckily I was in Miami at the time and the field elevation was all of 20 feet - not much of a problem. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 5/31/2010 8:06 PM, ContestID67 wrote:
He then takes a tow to what he thinks is 3,000 feet AGL but is only really at 2,000 feet AGL. The tow pilot doesn't think much about it as people get off tow early all the time. About to enter the pattern the AGL'er thinks, "Gee, the ground seems to be kind of large today ... but I am still at 1500 feet AGL so I'm must be OK." He then almost lands short as he was 1,000 feet lower than he thought. End of story? Nah. The poor guy couldn't tell the difference between 500' AGL and 1500' AGL by looking out the window? Sounds like it was time to retire his wings. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 31, 11:22*pm, Greg Arnold wrote:
On 5/31/2010 8:06 PM, ContestID67 wrote: He then takes a tow to what he thinks is 3,000 feet AGL but is only really at 2,000 feet AGL. *The tow pilot doesn't think much about it as people get off tow early all the time. *About to enter the pattern the AGL'er thinks, "Gee, the ground seems to be kind of large today ... but I am still at 1500 feet AGL so I'm must be OK." *He then almost lands short as he was 1,000 feet lower than he thought. *End of story? *Nah. The poor guy couldn't tell the difference between 500' AGL and 1500' AGL by looking out the window? *Sounds like it was time to retire his wings.. Here's a good one. I usually fly out of a busy general aviation airport right on the edge of Class C airspace. We are surrounded by mountains, talk to power planes and controllers, and fly cross country a lot, so we always use MSL. Recently I spent a sunny afternoon down at the local gliderport where they do a lot of training. I took a tow to the ridge and got off at about 3,200 (MSL). Much later that afternoon, the owner was up flying so I asked someone what I owed for the tow. They asked me how high I went and I said "3,200 feet." A quick look at the handy chart on the wall told me what I owed them for "3,200 feet" and I happily paid and left. On the drive home I was musing about how the price of tows was always going up, but who cares when the planes and gadgets cost so damned much. Then it hit me WHY they were going up. The gliderport uses AGL for training AND to calculate the tows to simplify the billing, and I hadn't deducted the field elevation when I told him "3,200 feet." I had bought about 800 feet of it sitting at the end of the runway waiting to hook up. All I could do was laugh at myself, and they are welcome to the tip for all they do for all of us. At least I hadn't scratched around cross country for two hours with my gear down like I usually do... Now THAT ****es me off! Don |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article
, ContestID67 wrote: We did have one incident related to the AGL/MSL switch that might be a good to read about. One day yours truly flew a club ship and set the altimeter to MSL. The next pilot was an die hard AGL'er. The AGL'ers were used to finding the altimer not quite at zero due to barometric changes and would "tweak" the altimeter to zero at the start of each flight. Our field elevation is 888 feet. So the next pilot tweaks the altimeter to "zero" but instead of subtracting 888 feet (by moving the hands CCW), he tweaks it CW and adds 112 feet! Can you see where this is going? I did pretty much the same thing in my MSL-only club. Atmospheric pressure had changed by 6-700ft from the last time the plane had flown, and I did the nearest-thousand thing you describe. Even better, I actually managed to do this twice in a row in our ASK-21! Discovered it when I got off tow. Casually asked my passenger what his altimeter said, and this discovered I'd managed to screw up both of them. Easy fix in the air once I realized what I'd done. Watch that thousands hand when you set your altimeter, and know what your altitudes look like outside the cockpit! -- Mike Ash Radio Free Earth Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 31, 11:06*pm, ContestID67 wrote:
Rolf, So about 5 years ago my Club's flight chair said that flying AGL was wrong, dangerous and (if I am not mistaken) illegal. * The "legal" issue is a slippery slope. Newbies to the sport (and I still consider myself one) may take everything their instructor says as the bible. Seems like learning and adhering to the FARs is a critical part of soaring. If we're taught to break certain FARs from the get go, what is the lesson there? Rob |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jun 2, 10:43*am, Rob wrote:
On May 31, 11:06*pm, ContestID67 wrote: Rolf, So about 5 years ago my Club's flight chair said that flying AGL was wrong, dangerous and (if I am not mistaken) illegal. * The "legal" issue is a slippery slope. *Newbies to the sport (and I still consider myself one) may take everything their instructor says as the bible. *Seems like learning and adhering to the FARs is a critical part of soaring. *If we're taught to break certain FARs from the get go, what is the lesson there? Rob That maybe you have the wrong instructor. UH |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jun 2, 10:57*am, wrote:
On Jun 2, 10:43*am, Rob wrote: On May 31, 11:06*pm, ContestID67 wrote: Rolf, So about 5 years ago my Club's flight chair said that flying AGL was wrong, dangerous and (if I am not mistaken) illegal. * The "legal" issue is a slippery slope. *Newbies to the sport (and I still consider myself one) may take everything their instructor says as the bible. *Seems like learning and adhering to the FARs is a critical part of soaring. *If we're taught to break certain FARs from the get go, what is the lesson there? Rob That maybe you have the wrong instructor. UH Perhaps, but the student is the wrong person to judge the professionalism of the instructor. I seem to recall that as one of the 1 hour sessions in my last CFI clinic, after all. All of us instructors do have the duty to be professional about what we're teaching. When I started flying many years ago the glider operation used QFE since we were only doing local flying. It was pointed out at some point that we would have to convert to doing it the proper way, but that pattern ops were easier to teach that way. Later I moved to a club environment that pretty much used QNH. I took my flight test there and it was pointed out that you had to switch over to QNH before you could take the test. After that, I moved to yet another club that was mostly using QFE, but after several years Tom came to visit, and we've used QNH since then. I have to say that it never really bothered me as to which setting was in use. Whenever going cross country, of course, I have always used QNH and, for that matter, I never look at my altimeter once I'm established on downwind, anyway. At the very first place we used Tom's landing checklist that ended with "ignore the altimeter", and that's stuck with me all along. I fly at least 80 flights a year as a primary instructor, and truthfully I can't tell you at what altitude we turn base or final. I judge those turns entirely by angle. -- Matt |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB: used 57mm Altimeter OR swap for 80mm Altimeter | joesimmers | Soaring | 0 | November 3rd 09 12:59 PM |
| setting up a Garmin 296 | Cub Driver | Piloting | 10 | October 29th 04 09:43 PM |
| Altimeter setting != Sea Level Pressure - Why? | JT Wright | Piloting | 5 | April 5th 04 02:04 AM |
| Setting QNH | BTIZ | Piloting | 31 | March 12th 04 05:29 PM |
| Setting up the workshop.... | Evan Batchelor | Restoration | 3 | March 4th 04 03:54 PM |