Ping Nesbitt

Bertie the Bunyip wrote in message ews.com...
(running with scissors) wrote
in om:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote in message
ews.com...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in
:


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in
news:0JydnYJ4TPELaJPdRVn- :

Whom does Knoyle sell his "negative knowledge" services to?


you, apparently.

Knoyle's employment is a "safety of flight" issue, bunyip.

And your alleged employment is a danger in flight issue.

****.

Bertie


and on the ground also.

Not to mention zoologically.

Bertie


What's with Tarver? He's constantly saying that someone should be run
out of the industry or that he'll use his connections to get someone
fired or in trouble with the law.

Once, I believe, he threatened my employment by saying that he'd rat
me out to Pratt & Whitney who he thought at the time was my employer.

My last two employers had zero problems with my work and in fact I
have no problems finding a job when I decide it's time to find
something more interesting to do.

Tom Mosher
(not at PWC)

"Tom Mosher" wrote in message
m...

What's with Tarver? He's constantly saying that someone should be run
out of the industry or that he'll use his connections to get someone
fired or in trouble with the law.

Been there done that.

That is how the aviation industry works here on Earth, Tommy.

Knoye is incompetent and his employeer deserves to share detrimental
consequences of Knoyle's archive troll.

It was all funny when sub-idiot Henriques was trying to damage my busineess
and SC Shafer didn't even want to be saved.

Tarver Engineering wrote:

"Tom Mosher" wrote in message
m...


What's with Tarver? He's constantly saying that someone should be run
out of the industry or that he'll use his connections to get someone
fired or in trouble with the law.


Been there done that.

That is how the aviation industry works here on Earth, Tommy.

Knoye is incompetent and his employeer deserves to share detrimental
consequences of Knoyle's archive troll.

It was all funny when sub-idiot Henriques was trying to damage my busineess
and SC Shafer didn't even want to be saved.


I know how the aviation industry works considering the fact that I've
worked or done work for Braniff, Flying Tigers, SouthWest, SimuFlite,
Nordam, Aeromet, Guiness Peat, GE Capital, Dassault and many others.

Tom Mosher
Senior Logistics Analyst

"Tom Mosher" wrote in message
igy.com...

I know how the aviation industry works considering the fact that I've
worked or done work for Braniff, Flying Tigers, SouthWest, SimuFlite,
Nordam, Aeromet, Guiness Peat, GE Capital, Dassault and many others.

Then you should get it just fine.

And you also know that standing up for incompetence will get this mess on
you.

Tarver Engineering wrote:

"Tom Mosher" wrote in message
igy.com...


I know how the aviation industry works considering the fact that I've
worked or done work for Braniff, Flying Tigers, SouthWest, SimuFlite,
Nordam, Aeromet, Guiness Peat, GE Capital, Dassault and many others.


Then you should get it just fine.

And you also know that standing up for incompetence will get this mess on
you.


....and what mess whould that be?

Trying to get someone fired over some bull**** posted on the newsgroups
is pretty juvenile of you.

Tom Mosher

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in
:


"Tom Mosher" wrote in message
m...

fired or in trouble with the law.

Been there done that.

Yep, pretty sure you have.


Bertie

From: (Tom Mosher)



What's with Tarver? He's constantly saying that someone should be run
out of the industry or that he'll use his connections to get someone
fired or in trouble with the law.

Once, I believe, he threatened my employment by saying that he'd rat
me out to Pratt & Whitney who he thought at the time was my employer.

My last two employers had zero problems with my work and in fact I
have no problems finding a job when I decide it's time to find
something more interesting to do.

Tom Mosher
(not at PWC)


My theory is he's just insecure. If he sent my employer anything I have said in
this or other newsgroup they would laugh since I know my stuff. Then again
tarver wouldn't get anywhere with me using that tactic since I am on disability
(100% VA). If you do a google search on tarver in RAM, rec.aviation.homebuilt,
some automotive etc newsgroups you will see he plays the same childish games
there.

My personal opinion is the man is a fraud. This is based on his almost complete
lack of knowledge about sytems I am very familiar with.

If he really were the expert he claims to be he would not have to resort to
threats, personal attacks and vulgarity when asked for verifiable citations for
anything he has ever claimed.

I don't ask you to accept my opinion, but a Google search on his name is quite
enlightening.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"B2431" wrote in message
...


My theory is he's just insecure. If he sent my employer anything I have
said in
this or other newsgroup they would laugh since I know my stuff.

Dan, you just finnished demopnstrating you are incompetent in the
thermocouple thread. You also bought into the Knoyle archive troll, which
indicates you are incompetent over a wide area of aircraft and aircraft
related systems.

At no time would I want you anywhere near any airplane carrying any
passenger.

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"B2431" wrote in message
...


My theory is he's just insecure. If he sent my employer anything I have
said in
this or other newsgroup they would laugh since I know my stuff.

Dan, you just finnished demopnstrating you are incompetent in the
thermocouple thread. You also bought into the Knoyle archive troll, which
indicates you are incompetent over a wide area of aircraft and aircraft
related systems.

At no time would I want you anywhere near any airplane carrying any
passenger.


I appreciate your mentioning my name once in a while but
you keep forgetting to mention the url.
http://home.att.net/~j.knoyle/the_ta...hronicles.html

Jimmy

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

That is because being afiliated with your archive troll is a demonstration
of incompetence.

Here are refutations of the first two sections of the Knoyle "be an idiot
too" archive troll.

"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
.. .
"Jim Knoyle" wrote:

Hang on here a second now Jim, you still need two samples. As Dan
says you need 'static pressure' to read the altitude from and you
need 'pitot pressure' (ram air pressure) as well as the static
pressure to derive the airspeed reading from. Sounds like you're
saying that you can read 'both' from just the 'ram air pressure'
alone. Or did I misunderstand you?

Jim has finally figued out what a pitot tube is, but somehow he still wants
to be correct in his archive troll. It is a great paradox.


I know...ain't life a bitch John

--

-Gord.

Ralph Nesbitt wrote:

Ok educate me. As previously stated my experience with "Pitot Tubes &
Associated Systems" is due fires on Pitot Covers & associated Red "Remove
Before Flight" streamers, plus IFE's due system problems associated with
Pitot Tubes.

We put those covers on pitot tubes to keep the mud bees out, dippy.