![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
bildan wrote:
My experience is the difference between the worst and best handling glider is fairly small. No. Give a low-time student an ASK-21 and he will happily thermal away. Give the same student a Fox and he will kill himself. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 20, 2:55*pm, John Smith wrote:
bildan wrote: My experience is the difference between the worst and best handling glider is fairly small. No. Give a low-time student an ASK-21 and he will happily thermal away. Give the same student a Fox and he will kill himself. Thanks for bringing up the Fox. Learn to fly one with a great instructor and every other glider will seem like a pussycat. THEN, you're a safe - at least from handling issues. A competent pilot (meaning one who has trained in the Fox with an expert) can fly a Fox safely AND fly the ASK-21 safely. The student thermalling happily in an ASK-21 is neither competent nor safe since he may have to land in a gusty crosswind among other things. The key here isn't the glider, it's the pilot's skill. No glider is so 'forgiving' that it will save a pilot from himself or from the inevitable flukes of nature and few, if any, gliders are so viscous a pilot can't be trained to fly them safely. Safety, to the extent that it exists, is in the skill set a pilot brings to the task. I learned to fly in an LK-10A - a glider whose spin characteristics make a 2-32 seem like a pussycat. We trained all sorts to fly it and, yes, there were a few accidents but they were the same kind students have with 2-33's. Pilots were afraid of the LK's spin characteristics so they were careful not to spin (a good thing). Instead of spinning, they hit fences. Let me repeat my key point - you can't buy safety, you have to earn it with training, practice and RESPECT. If a pilot is so concerned about his ability he's seeking to buy a 'safe'glider, he should spend his money on more training. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
bildan wrote:
On Jul 20, 2:55 pm, John wrote: bildan wrote: My experience is the difference between the worst and best handling glider is fairly small. No. Give a low-time student an ASK-21 and he will happily thermal away. Give the same student a Fox and he will kill himself. .... Let me repeat my key point - you can't buy safety, you have to earn it .... Without any doubt. But you claimed that the difference in handling among gliders was "fairly small". And this just isn't so. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 20, 5:24*pm, John Smith wrote:
bildan wrote: On Jul 20, 2:55 pm, John *wrote: bildan wrote: My experience is the difference between the worst and best handling glider is fairly small. No. Give a low-time student an ASK-21 and he will happily thermal away.. Give the same student a Fox and he will kill himself. ... Let me repeat my key point - you can't buy safety, you have to earn it ... Without any doubt. But you claimed that the difference in handling among gliders was "fairly small". And this just isn't so. It is so. If you step outside the cloistered world of sailplanes into the world of airplanes you'll find very wide differences. Withing the wide world of aviation, sailplanes exist in a "fairly small" envelope of handling qualities. There are outliers, of course, but the majority are pretty much alike in being very benign, gentle aircraft. Pilots whose entire experience is limited to sailplanes may tend to magnify small differences others wouldn't notice. I've never flown a glider with a 'bad rep' which lived up to it and I have more than 200 types in my logbook. I once owned a Lark IS28B2 which, in come circles, has a bad reputation for unintentional spins. You'll hear things like, "It'll just drop out from under you." This isn't true. I took one such pilot for a BFR check ride in the Lark. When I asked him to demonstrate slow flight, he didn't notice the glider's pronounced pre-stall buffet. It was shaking the glider until stuff fell off the Velcro but HE was shaking even more than the glider. When I took the controls, calmed him down and asked him to feel the buffet, I was able to tell him, "See, it warns you before it stalls - just feel for the buffet." For him it was an epiphany - he really enjoyed the rest of the flight. Same thing with a 2-32 which is a big old sweetheart. It has a nice little shake to the stick which tells you it's too slow but you won't feel it if you have a death grip. Yes, it'll spin but not without warning. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/20/2010 3:57 PM, bildan wrote:
Let me repeat my key point - you can't buy safety, you have to earn it with training, practice and RESPECT. If a pilot is so concerned about his ability he's seeking to buy a 'safe'glider, he should spend his money on more training. I believe you can buy safety, or at least more safety. Gliders are not all certified to the same standard, and that is why the older gliders, like the Std Cirrus, are not as forgiving as the newer gliders. And the safety you can buy is not just easier handling, but things like automatic hookups and crash-resistant cockpits. But don't understand my use of the word "buy" to mean just "spend more money"; it's more about the glider you select, not the amount you pay for it. My real message: some gliders are safer to fly because they land more slowly, have excellent glidepath control, don't want to spin, give plenty of warning, recover quickly from mishandling, and generally offer more protection screwups in a variety of ways. A pilot that is qualified to assemble and fly a Nimbus 4 will have a greater margin in an ASK 21. A pilot that can't manage a Nimbus 4 can still be a very safe pilot in a Blanik. Gliders are not the same across the spectrum available to the buyer. I've flown my ASH 26 E for 15 years and 3000 hours with out any accidents, so I believe I'm qualified to fly it. Do I believe I'd be safer in an ASK 21? Yes! Occasionally, I do fly a slower, simpler glider, and I'm amazed at how easy it is. It reminds that my safety margins are smaller with my ASH 26 E, but I accept that because I enjoy it so much it's worth the risk. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (netto to net to email me) - "Transponders in Sailplanes - Feb/2010" also ADS-B, PCAS, Flarm http://tinyurl.com/yb3xywl - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation Mar/2004" Much of what you need to know tinyurl.com/yfs7tnz |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Please ID 3 sailplanes | Every time | Soaring | 4 | August 20th 08 09:34 PM |
don't try to prepare potentially while you're forgiving with a rough string | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | August 13th 07 04:01 AM |
Repost from Feb. 2002: " forgiving training heli" by Bob Barbanes | [email protected] | Rotorcraft | 2 | January 30th 06 08:23 PM |
New Products for Sailplanes. | [email protected] | Soaring | 6 | July 4th 05 09:27 AM |
50+:1 15m sailplanes | Paul T | Soaring | 92 | January 19th 04 01:59 AM |