![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/9/2010 5:07 PM, flyingmr2 wrote:
/snip/ Please, everyone stay safe and no more crashing! If we have another fatality in the west anytime soon, my wife might pull the plug on her support for this hobby./snip/ Please fly safe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! One way to fly safe - er, is to avoid being in the vicinity of other aircraft. Easy for me to say! That might mean no contests? Brian W |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/9/2010 9:19 PM, brian whatcott wrote:
On 8/9/2010 5:07 PM, flyingmr2 wrote: /snip/ Please, everyone stay safe and no more crashing! If we have another fatality in the west anytime soon, my wife might pull the plug on her support for this hobby./snip/ Please fly safe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! One way to fly safe - er, is to avoid being in the vicinity of other aircraft. Easy for me to say! That might mean no contests? Brian W Given the current turmoil with ADS-B vs. Powerflarm, etc....the smartest investment might not be any avionics at all, but a ballistic recovery chute. -- Mike Schumann |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 9, 9:05*pm, Mike Schumann
wrote: On 8/9/2010 9:19 PM, brian whatcott wrote: On 8/9/2010 5:07 PM, flyingmr2 wrote: /snip/ Please, everyone stay safe and no more crashing! If we have another fatality in the west anytime soon, my wife might pull the plug on her support for this hobby./snip/ Please fly safe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! One way to fly safe - er, is to avoid being in the vicinity of other aircraft. Easy for me to say! That might mean no contests? Brian W Given the current turmoil with ADS-B vs. Powerflarm, etc....the smartest investment might not be any avionics at all, but a ballistic recovery chute. -- Mike Schumann Mike, with respect, it seems that you are quite fixated on ADS-B and the way FLARM was (not) introduced to the US, and that you respond to every post with that filter. I don't see the turmoil; I have a transponder, so if you have powerflarm you will see me. If you have ADS-B, flarm, or powerflarm I will see you, because I am going to have a powerflarm ASAP. So you have flarm or powerflarm you will see me again. If power traffic is a threat I will see it (their transponder). If they have ATC following, or TCAS they will see my transponder. The turmoil, is it that the exact form of what we will be using in 10 years is not clear? That seems a separate subject. And the ballistic chute, like that Cirrus had that went through the tow plane, I recall they burned on the way down, not a fun ride. It's speculation, but if you project that into next year, and that glider on tow had powerflarm it (in theory) would have alerted the glider to the incoming cirrus when it alerted to the transponder and that could have made the difference. Any way you slice it the $1,600 seems like cheap insurance to me. Brian |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/10/2010 12:59 AM, brianDG303 wrote:
On Aug 9, 9:05 pm, Mike wrote: On 8/9/2010 9:19 PM, brian whatcott wrote: On 8/9/2010 5:07 PM, flyingmr2 wrote: /snip/ Please, everyone stay safe and no more crashing! If we have another fatality in the west anytime soon, my wife might pull the plug on her support for this hobby./snip/ Please fly safe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! One way to fly safe - er, is to avoid being in the vicinity of other aircraft. Easy for me to say! That might mean no contests? Brian W Given the current turmoil with ADS-B vs. Powerflarm, etc....the smartest investment might not be any avionics at all, but a ballistic recovery chute. -- Mike Schumann Mike, with respect, it seems that you are quite fixated on ADS-B and the way FLARM was (not) introduced to the US, and that you respond to every post with that filter. I don't see the turmoil; I have a transponder, so if you have powerflarm you will see me. If you have ADS-B, flarm, or powerflarm I will see you, because I am going to have a powerflarm ASAP. So you have flarm or powerflarm you will see me again. If power traffic is a threat I will see it (their transponder). If they have ATC following, or TCAS they will see my transponder. The turmoil, is it that the exact form of what we will be using in 10 years is not clear? That seems a separate subject. And the ballistic chute, like that Cirrus had that went through the tow plane, I recall they burned on the way down, not a fun ride. It's speculation, but if you project that into next year, and that glider on tow had powerflarm it (in theory) would have alerted the glider to the incoming cirrus when it alerted to the transponder and that could have made the difference. Any way you slice it the $1,600 seems like cheap insurance to me. Brian There are a lot of people drinking the PowerFlarm koolaid. PowerFlarm will not see everyone. In remote areas, where there are no ADS-B ground stations and transponders are not interrogated by radar systems, PowerFlarm will not see other aircraft that are equipped with conventional transponders or ADS-B UAT transponders. I'm not pushing any particular technology. My only point is that the cornerstone of an effective collision avoidance strategy is to have everyone utilize a single common technology. Ten years ago that could have been FLARM, ADS-B UAT, or ....... What we have now is a huge mess, where the FAA is pushing two flavors of ADS-B, which can't see each other in remote low altitude environments, and now the glider community is going off on their own with FLARM. Maybe this will all shake out over the next ten years and everyone will end up gravitating to one of these technologies. On the other hand, we could also end up with ten more years of the current mayhem and fatal accidents. -- Mike Schumann |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/10/2010 12:07 AM, Mike Schumann wrote:
There are a lot of people drinking the PowerFlarm koolaid. PowerFlarm will not see everyone. It is not the perfect solution, so you reject it entirely? We have to use the best of what is available to us, and right now that is PowerFlarm. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/10/2010 2:58 PM, Greg Arnold wrote:
On 8/10/2010 12:07 AM, Mike Schumann wrote: There are a lot of people drinking the PowerFlarm koolaid. PowerFlarm will not see everyone. It is not the perfect solution, so you reject it entirely? We have to use the best of what is available to us, and right now that is PowerFlarm. Powerflarm is not yet shipping. The Navworx ADS-B transceiver is. Right now, ADS-B and PCAS are your options. -- Mike Schumann |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 10, 1:29*pm, Mike Schumann
wrote: Powerflarm is not yet shipping. *The Navworx ADS-B transceiver is. Right now, ADS-B and PCAS are your options. -- Mike Schumann Mike - And the Navworx unit that you so heavily promote is $1500 + whatever the cost for a display (I see some PNA software for $800, or you buy an EFIS). AND it doesn't support FLARM and I don't see where it detects and displays Mode C/S (unless you're receiving traffic relays from ground stations). --Noel |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trig TT21 transponder draws only 125 mA! | Steve Koerner | Soaring | 5 | March 15th 10 09:59 PM |
TRIG TT21 Transponders | Tim Mara[_2_] | Soaring | 12 | September 26th 09 02:01 AM |
Trig TT21 Transponder receives FAA TSO approval | Paul Remde | Soaring | 12 | September 19th 09 02:47 PM |
Trig TT21 in Experimental Aircraft | Paul Remde | Soaring | 5 | July 5th 09 03:15 AM |
Trig TT21 Transponder Thoughts? | jcarlyle | Soaring | 16 | June 23rd 09 04:38 PM |