![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/23/2010 3:43 PM, Andy wrote:
On Oct 22, 7:58 am, John wrote: I think the answer to everything is more complexity????? Adding a 3rd collision avoidance technology is more complexity. If I was running the the FAA, we'd have a single ADS-B technology period. That's simplicity. It seems that Darryl has consumed so much Koolaid that he's starting to hallucinate. -- Mike Schumann But you're not running the FAA, the FAA is running the FAA. And the way they are running it, if Flarm or similar devices were to add ADS-B out or operate through the ADS-B protocol rather than low-power direct radio, it would cost them thousands of more dollars, many more amps, plus interminable certification delays. It's not happening; Powerflarm is here and now -- you can see the jets, you get superb collision avoidance with other gliders and towplanes that install it, and if you add a mode-S transponder the jets can see you. It makes perfect sense to separate the "in" and glider-glider box (not certified) from the much more expensive and certified "out" and "jet sees you" box. I just can't understand the fuss. Who is drinking the koolaid here? John Cochrane Amen. The Navworx "simple solution" transceiver draws nearly 1 amp at 12 volts WITHOUT a display, doesn't integrate with any existing soaring computers, doesn't do glider flight path projection that is essential to glider-glider collision avoidance and doesn't directly receive 1090ES data-out signals for the multitude of areas where that's what you need because the ground station coverage isn't designed for the places glider fly. Oh, and it costs $2500 but doesn't include PCAS. So it solves exactly ZERO of the problems that currently matter to glider pilots and, IMO, is likely to lose out to 1090ES in the long run because of the aforementioned regulatory requirements. PowerFlarm plus a Trig 21 is a great way to go because it solves actual problems we have today and PowerFlarm alone is a pretty good improvement overall and adequate if you don't fly near a major commercial airport. Seems simple enough to me. 9B You can argue all of these points ad nauseum, but your credibility goes out the window when you say that PowerFlarm is here and now. It has not been FCC approved, is not available for sale in the US and is not shipping. When it is, go ahead and push it all you want. In the mean time, the Navworx box is shipping. Yes, it may not be the ideal solution; it may not integrate with glide computers; it may draw more power than you want; it may be too expensive. But it is here and now, unlike PowerFlarm. -- Mike Schumann |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Build your own PowerFLARM! | Darryl Ramm | Soaring | 51 | August 19th 10 06:39 PM |
KDR-510 question (VDL Mode 2 receiver?) | Filip Zawadiak | Owning | 0 | June 30th 04 04:16 PM |
KDR-510 question (VDL Mode 2 receiver?) | Filip Zawadiak | Piloting | 0 | June 30th 04 04:16 PM |
KDR-510 question (VDL Mode 2 receiver?) | Filip Zawadiak | Products | 0 | June 30th 04 04:16 PM |
Question on missing Mode-C | Ray Bengen | Owning | 10 | March 2nd 04 11:59 PM |